25.12.2013 Views

Was sollen wir tun? Was dürfen wir glauben? - bei DuEPublico ...

Was sollen wir tun? Was dürfen wir glauben? - bei DuEPublico ...

Was sollen wir tun? Was dürfen wir glauben? - bei DuEPublico ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MECHANISTISCHE ERKLÄRUNG: REDUKTIV ODER NICHT? 235<br />

Bechtel, W. und Hamilton, A. 2007: „Reduction, Integration, and the Unity of Science:<br />

Natural, Behavioral, and Social Sciences and the Humanities“, in T. A. F. Kuipers<br />

(Hrg.): General Philosophy of Science: Focal Issues, Amsterdam; Heidelberg: Elsevier,<br />

377–430.<br />

Bickle, J. 1996: „New Wave Psychophysical Reduction and the Methodological Caveats“,<br />

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56, 57–78.<br />

— 1998: Psychoneural Reduction: The New Wave. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.<br />

Birbaumer, N. und Schmidt, R. F. 2006: Biologische Psychologie. 6. überarb. Aufl.<br />

Heidelberg: Springer.<br />

Churchland, P. S. 1986: Neurophilosophy: Toward a Unified Science of the Mind-Brain.<br />

Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.<br />

Craver, C. F. 2002: „Interlevel Experiments and Multilevel Mechanisms in the Neuroscience<br />

of Memory“, Philosophy of Science 69, S83–S97.<br />

— 2005: „Beyond Reduction: Mechanisms, Multifield Integration and the Unity of<br />

Neuroscience“, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical<br />

Sciences 36, 373–95.<br />

— 2007: Explaining the Brain. New York: Oxford University Press.<br />

Craver, C. F. und Bechtel, W. 2007: „Top-Down Causation without Top-Down Causes“,<br />

Biology and Philosophy 22, 547–63.<br />

Fazekas, P. und Kertész, G. 2011: „Causation at Different Levels: Tracking the Commitments<br />

of Mechanistic Explanations“, Biology and Philosophy 26, 365–83.<br />

Fodor, J. A. 1974: „Special Sciences (Or: The Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis)“,<br />

Synthese 28, 97–115.<br />

Hooker, C. A. 1981: „Towards a General Theory of Reduction“, Dialogue 20, 38–60, 201–36,<br />

496–529.<br />

Kim, J. 2005: Physicalism, or Something Near Enough. Princeton: Princeton University<br />

Press.<br />

Machamer, P., Darden, L. und Craver, C. F. 2000: „Thinking about Mechanisms“, Philosophy<br />

of Science 67, 1–25.<br />

McCauley, R. N. 1986: „Intertheoretic Relations and the Future of Psychology“, Philosophy of<br />

Science 53, 179–98.<br />

Nagel, E. 1961: The Structure of Science. London: Routledge.<br />

Oppenheim, P. und Putnam, H. 1958: „Unity of Science as a Working Hypothesis“, in H. Feigl<br />

und M. Scriven (Hrg.): Concepts, Theories and the Mind-Body-Problem. Minnesota<br />

Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 2. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press,<br />

3–36.<br />

Schaffner, K. 1967: „Approaches to Reduction“, Philosophy of Science 34, 137–47.<br />

Schandry, R. 2003: Biologische Psychologie. Weinheim: BeltzPVU.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!