Stony Brook University - SUNY Digital Repository
Stony Brook University - SUNY Digital Repository Stony Brook University - SUNY Digital Repository
disease brought about by the influence of the Enlightenment resulted in a number of respectable advances. However, according to Dr. Erwin Ackerknecht, it was not until the nineteenth century that medicine made its greatest progress. Of this, Ackerknecht explains: Medicine had been scientific in intention for a long time. But only during the nineteenth century did it become to a large extent scientific in fact. In general it was the systematic promotion and application of natural science which gave the nineteenth century its most characteristic features. (145) For Ackerknecht, the influence of Western Science, with its utter reverence of Reason and all that this entailed, upon the theory and practice of medicine, “the application of the basic sciences to the problems of clinical medicine” (156) as Ackerknecht put it, cannot be stressed enough. To that end, Ackerknecht continues: The basic sciences gave medicine an unprecedented knowledge of the intricate structures of the human body. They provided a means of correlating pathological signs with changes in those structures; they allowed the main functions of the body […] to be understood as never before; they made possible the objective measurement of these functions and their deviations from the normal; and they made therapeutic action equally predictable and measurable. It is obvious that this new background was to have a decisive influence on the future development of clinical medicine. (168-9) Of crucial significance here is the concept of the rendering of health as well as illness “predictable and measurable,” in particular with regard to some “normal” standard. Through the use of the principles of basic science, physicians practicing 66
under the aegis of Western medicine believed that illness and disease could not only be predicted and measured but, perhaps more critically, controlled. Western physicians sought to arrive at a single unifying diagnosis of some cluster of symptoms brought about by a single, underlying cause, which could then be cured through a single, definitive treatment. What resulted from this perspective of illness was an extremely linear progression of medical phenomena: Bacteria or Virus A begets Symptoms B which beget Disease C which begets Cure D. This has become known as “The Germ Theory,” which, according to alternative medicine author Dr. Dean Black in his book Health At the Crossroads, contends that, “[D]iseases are caused by microorganisms that invade us and disturb our inner chemistry. […] The medical goal here is to kill the germs before they kill us” (14). In this way, the intended cure for those “germs” works as a sort of “magic bullet”: one treatment, one kill. This Western system that arose in the nineteenth century stood in opposition to the far older Eastern Medicine, which perceived multiple causes for illness and disease and, accordingly, multiple treatments. From this Eastern perspective, illness was not “predictable and measurable,” at least not with any degree of certainty, because it acknowledged the “mystery” – that which is uncertain – in human health and illness, as well as the greater universe. This is more in tune with contemporary 67
- Page 23 and 24: now have my doubts, which is what b
- Page 25 and 26: the invisible, hearing the inaudibl
- Page 27 and 28: “problem-posing education”: a
- Page 29 and 30: “uncertainty.” But when it was
- Page 31 and 32: After the study was finished, Perry
- Page 33 and 34: a vehement belief in “writing wit
- Page 35 and 36: philosophies of teaching. In his bo
- Page 37 and 38: until sometime later - after confro
- Page 39 and 40: eginnings of humanity itself. In th
- Page 41 and 42: conversation and, in its place, pag
- Page 43 and 44: [W]hat happened to rhetoric in Amer
- Page 45 and 46: cannot be discussed because they ar
- Page 47 and 48: States of America in the 1800s for
- Page 49 and 50: making and doing” (6). And for De
- Page 51 and 52: “Allegory of the Cave.” It took
- Page 53 and 54: not a denigration of Christianity,
- Page 55 and 56: severe, black or white: either foll
- Page 57 and 58: easoning behind those words. Early
- Page 59 and 60: transcendent reality and thus satis
- Page 61 and 62: imaginative novelty and creative tr
- Page 63 and 64: eality that the faithful were allow
- Page 65 and 66: with which all other societies were
- Page 67 and 68: field of composition was not, as Co
- Page 69 and 70: ecause of its “epistemological su
- Page 71 and 72: proclamation “Cogito Ergo Sum,”
- Page 73: This power of modern Western scienc
- Page 77 and 78: the masters of nature ... Instead o
- Page 79 and 80: and, during this time, “assimilat
- Page 81 and 82: as in specific political, ideologic
- Page 83 and 84: Darkness. For Said, it was in the p
- Page 85 and 86: In its institutionalized form - fre
- Page 87 and 88: III. Before I continue any further,
- Page 89 and 90: It is an unavoidable fact of life.
- Page 91 and 92: Tarnas refers to those “contradic
- Page 93 and 94: news” of such pervasive and overw
- Page 95 and 96: when writers shrink from that uncer
- Page 97 and 98: Uncertainty and the prolonging of U
- Page 99 and 100: falling away to such a “shift”
- Page 101 and 102: Rhetoric. She would root that “sh
- Page 103 and 104: For my real purpose here then, it i
- Page 105 and 106: Although Hairston is writing about
- Page 107 and 108: of them, I was enlightened. I was p
- Page 109 and 110: All experiences, even the scientifi
- Page 111 and 112: the tendency of that reality to mak
- Page 113 and 114: asking the same question: What had
- Page 115 and 116: and “truth” simply ends where i
- Page 117 and 118: silence we have so often deplored [
- Page 119 and 120: attempting to make room for the exc
- Page 121 and 122: said, I would pose another question
- Page 123 and 124: From [a theoretical] point of view,
under the aegis of Western medicine believed that illness and<br />
disease could not only be predicted and measured but, perhaps<br />
more critically, controlled. Western physicians sought to<br />
arrive at a single unifying diagnosis of some cluster of<br />
symptoms brought about by a single, underlying cause, which<br />
could then be cured through a single, definitive treatment.<br />
What resulted from this perspective of illness was an extremely<br />
linear progression of medical phenomena: Bacteria or Virus A<br />
begets Symptoms B which beget Disease C which begets Cure D.<br />
This has become known as “The Germ Theory,” which, according to<br />
alternative medicine author Dr. Dean Black in his book Health At<br />
the Crossroads, contends that, “[D]iseases are caused by<br />
microorganisms that invade us and disturb our inner chemistry.<br />
[…] The medical goal here is to kill the germs before they kill<br />
us” (14). In this way, the intended cure for those “germs”<br />
works as a sort of “magic bullet”: one treatment, one kill.<br />
This Western system that arose in the nineteenth century stood<br />
in opposition to the far older Eastern Medicine, which perceived<br />
multiple causes for illness and disease and, accordingly,<br />
multiple treatments. From this Eastern perspective, illness was<br />
not “predictable and measurable,” at least not with any degree<br />
of certainty, because it acknowledged the “mystery” – that which<br />
is uncertain – in human health and illness, as well as the<br />
greater universe. This is more in tune with contemporary<br />
67