Stony Brook University - SUNY Digital Repository
Stony Brook University - SUNY Digital Repository Stony Brook University - SUNY Digital Repository
However, as time passed, science – scientific thought and scientific investigations – became more and more ubiquitous, especially as those once-dark corners of the globe became enlightened with the hope and promise of Christianity thanks to Western exploration, trade, missionary work, and colonization. And according to a common portrait of history, the twilight of that God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob was brought about by the dawn of the new God of the microscope, the telescope, and the anatomist’s table. While the West would indeed seem to have become more “secular,” as Tarnas asserted before, after the “Scientific Revolution” that spread throughout Europe in the 16 th and 17 th centuries and then the “Industrial Revolution” of the 18 th and 19 th centuries in Europe and the United States and, thus, less and less ruled by that “unchanging doctrinal formulae” of Christianity, beneath such appearances, however, I believe those two social and cultural prime movers, Christianity and Science, were not, in the end, as different as they have been assumed to be. As Tarnas contends later in his book: The West had ‘lost its faith’ – and found a new one, in science and in man. But paradoxically, much of the Christian world view found continued life, albeit in often unrecognized forms, in the West’s new secular outlook. […] The West’s belief in itself as the most historically significant and favored culture echoed the Judeo-Christian theme of the Chosen People. The global expansion of Western culture as the best and most appropriate for all mankind represented a secular continuation of the Roman Catholic Church’s self-concept as the one universal Church for all humanity. Modern civilization now replaced Christianity as the cultural norm and ideal 56
with which all other societies were to be compared, and to which they were to be converted. (320-3) Yes, the loosening of Christianity’s apparent hold upon the Western world without a doubt had theological consequences; however, in terms of epistemology or even ideology, I do doubt the severity of those consequences. For me, Science was not the successor of that “Christian world view” but its inheritor, because they both seem to have had the very same “god”: certainty. The certainty that Western Science sought out and sought to cultivate was no less “absolute and unshakeable,” no less “supreme,” than what was worshipped by the Christian Church in the form of the Word of God and the resurrected living Logos of Jesus Christ. This “scientific” certainty guaranteed the same things: order, stability, authority, and control. It was that certainty that allowed the new god Science to usher the West unto “modernity” and almost every aspect of that “modern” world of the West was affected by it. And rhetoric and what would become known after the nineteenth century as “composition” was no less influenced than any of the other so-called “social sciences.” The phenomenon that Robert Connors wrote wherein, again, “a 2,500-year-old intellectual tradition adopts an almost completely new base of theory, a variety of novel pedagogies, an almost completely changed audience and constituency, and a wholly new cultural status in less than eighty years” (24), was, I believe, the natural result of an America whose perspective 57
- Page 13 and 14: through experiences in the writing
- Page 15 and 16: the same old thing all over again.
- Page 17 and 18: theory and research permeating thro
- Page 19 and 20: I. With no reservations, I call mys
- Page 21 and 22: fill in all of the empty variables.
- Page 23 and 24: now have my doubts, which is what b
- Page 25 and 26: the invisible, hearing the inaudibl
- Page 27 and 28: “problem-posing education”: a
- Page 29 and 30: “uncertainty.” But when it was
- Page 31 and 32: After the study was finished, Perry
- Page 33 and 34: a vehement belief in “writing wit
- Page 35 and 36: philosophies of teaching. In his bo
- Page 37 and 38: until sometime later - after confro
- Page 39 and 40: eginnings of humanity itself. In th
- Page 41 and 42: conversation and, in its place, pag
- Page 43 and 44: [W]hat happened to rhetoric in Amer
- Page 45 and 46: cannot be discussed because they ar
- Page 47 and 48: States of America in the 1800s for
- Page 49 and 50: making and doing” (6). And for De
- Page 51 and 52: “Allegory of the Cave.” It took
- Page 53 and 54: not a denigration of Christianity,
- Page 55 and 56: severe, black or white: either foll
- Page 57 and 58: easoning behind those words. Early
- Page 59 and 60: transcendent reality and thus satis
- Page 61 and 62: imaginative novelty and creative tr
- Page 63: eality that the faithful were allow
- Page 67 and 68: field of composition was not, as Co
- Page 69 and 70: ecause of its “epistemological su
- Page 71 and 72: proclamation “Cogito Ergo Sum,”
- Page 73 and 74: This power of modern Western scienc
- Page 75 and 76: under the aegis of Western medicine
- Page 77 and 78: the masters of nature ... Instead o
- Page 79 and 80: and, during this time, “assimilat
- Page 81 and 82: as in specific political, ideologic
- Page 83 and 84: Darkness. For Said, it was in the p
- Page 85 and 86: In its institutionalized form - fre
- Page 87 and 88: III. Before I continue any further,
- Page 89 and 90: It is an unavoidable fact of life.
- Page 91 and 92: Tarnas refers to those “contradic
- Page 93 and 94: news” of such pervasive and overw
- Page 95 and 96: when writers shrink from that uncer
- Page 97 and 98: Uncertainty and the prolonging of U
- Page 99 and 100: falling away to such a “shift”
- Page 101 and 102: Rhetoric. She would root that “sh
- Page 103 and 104: For my real purpose here then, it i
- Page 105 and 106: Although Hairston is writing about
- Page 107 and 108: of them, I was enlightened. I was p
- Page 109 and 110: All experiences, even the scientifi
- Page 111 and 112: the tendency of that reality to mak
- Page 113 and 114: asking the same question: What had
However, as time passed, science – scientific thought and<br />
scientific investigations – became more and more ubiquitous,<br />
especially as those once-dark corners of the globe became<br />
enlightened with the hope and promise of Christianity thanks to<br />
Western exploration, trade, missionary work, and colonization.<br />
And according to a common portrait of history, the twilight of<br />
that God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob was brought about by the<br />
dawn of the new God of the microscope, the telescope, and the<br />
anatomist’s table. While the West would indeed seem to have<br />
become more “secular,” as Tarnas asserted before, after the<br />
“Scientific Revolution” that spread throughout Europe in the 16 th<br />
and 17 th<br />
centuries and then the “Industrial Revolution” of the<br />
18 th and 19 th centuries in Europe and the United States and, thus,<br />
less and less ruled by that “unchanging doctrinal formulae” of<br />
Christianity, beneath such appearances, however, I believe those<br />
two social and cultural prime movers, Christianity and Science,<br />
were not, in the end, as different as they have been assumed to<br />
be. As Tarnas contends later in his book:<br />
The West had ‘lost its faith’ – and found a new one,<br />
in science and in man. But paradoxically, much of<br />
the Christian world view found continued life, albeit<br />
in often unrecognized forms, in the West’s new<br />
secular outlook. […] The West’s belief in itself as<br />
the most historically significant and favored culture<br />
echoed the Judeo-Christian theme of the Chosen<br />
People. The global expansion of Western culture as<br />
the best and most appropriate for all mankind<br />
represented a secular continuation of the Roman<br />
Catholic Church’s self-concept as the one universal<br />
Church for all humanity. Modern civilization now<br />
replaced Christianity as the cultural norm and ideal<br />
56