Stony Brook University - SUNY Digital Repository

Stony Brook University - SUNY Digital Repository Stony Brook University - SUNY Digital Repository

dspace.sunyconnect.suny.edu
from dspace.sunyconnect.suny.edu More from this publisher
25.12.2013 Views

However, as time passed, science – scientific thought and scientific investigations – became more and more ubiquitous, especially as those once-dark corners of the globe became enlightened with the hope and promise of Christianity thanks to Western exploration, trade, missionary work, and colonization. And according to a common portrait of history, the twilight of that God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob was brought about by the dawn of the new God of the microscope, the telescope, and the anatomist’s table. While the West would indeed seem to have become more “secular,” as Tarnas asserted before, after the “Scientific Revolution” that spread throughout Europe in the 16 th and 17 th centuries and then the “Industrial Revolution” of the 18 th and 19 th centuries in Europe and the United States and, thus, less and less ruled by that “unchanging doctrinal formulae” of Christianity, beneath such appearances, however, I believe those two social and cultural prime movers, Christianity and Science, were not, in the end, as different as they have been assumed to be. As Tarnas contends later in his book: The West had ‘lost its faith’ – and found a new one, in science and in man. But paradoxically, much of the Christian world view found continued life, albeit in often unrecognized forms, in the West’s new secular outlook. […] The West’s belief in itself as the most historically significant and favored culture echoed the Judeo-Christian theme of the Chosen People. The global expansion of Western culture as the best and most appropriate for all mankind represented a secular continuation of the Roman Catholic Church’s self-concept as the one universal Church for all humanity. Modern civilization now replaced Christianity as the cultural norm and ideal 56

with which all other societies were to be compared, and to which they were to be converted. (320-3) Yes, the loosening of Christianity’s apparent hold upon the Western world without a doubt had theological consequences; however, in terms of epistemology or even ideology, I do doubt the severity of those consequences. For me, Science was not the successor of that “Christian world view” but its inheritor, because they both seem to have had the very same “god”: certainty. The certainty that Western Science sought out and sought to cultivate was no less “absolute and unshakeable,” no less “supreme,” than what was worshipped by the Christian Church in the form of the Word of God and the resurrected living Logos of Jesus Christ. This “scientific” certainty guaranteed the same things: order, stability, authority, and control. It was that certainty that allowed the new god Science to usher the West unto “modernity” and almost every aspect of that “modern” world of the West was affected by it. And rhetoric and what would become known after the nineteenth century as “composition” was no less influenced than any of the other so-called “social sciences.” The phenomenon that Robert Connors wrote wherein, again, “a 2,500-year-old intellectual tradition adopts an almost completely new base of theory, a variety of novel pedagogies, an almost completely changed audience and constituency, and a wholly new cultural status in less than eighty years” (24), was, I believe, the natural result of an America whose perspective 57

However, as time passed, science – scientific thought and<br />

scientific investigations – became more and more ubiquitous,<br />

especially as those once-dark corners of the globe became<br />

enlightened with the hope and promise of Christianity thanks to<br />

Western exploration, trade, missionary work, and colonization.<br />

And according to a common portrait of history, the twilight of<br />

that God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob was brought about by the<br />

dawn of the new God of the microscope, the telescope, and the<br />

anatomist’s table. While the West would indeed seem to have<br />

become more “secular,” as Tarnas asserted before, after the<br />

“Scientific Revolution” that spread throughout Europe in the 16 th<br />

and 17 th<br />

centuries and then the “Industrial Revolution” of the<br />

18 th and 19 th centuries in Europe and the United States and, thus,<br />

less and less ruled by that “unchanging doctrinal formulae” of<br />

Christianity, beneath such appearances, however, I believe those<br />

two social and cultural prime movers, Christianity and Science,<br />

were not, in the end, as different as they have been assumed to<br />

be. As Tarnas contends later in his book:<br />

The West had ‘lost its faith’ – and found a new one,<br />

in science and in man. But paradoxically, much of<br />

the Christian world view found continued life, albeit<br />

in often unrecognized forms, in the West’s new<br />

secular outlook. […] The West’s belief in itself as<br />

the most historically significant and favored culture<br />

echoed the Judeo-Christian theme of the Chosen<br />

People. The global expansion of Western culture as<br />

the best and most appropriate for all mankind<br />

represented a secular continuation of the Roman<br />

Catholic Church’s self-concept as the one universal<br />

Church for all humanity. Modern civilization now<br />

replaced Christianity as the cultural norm and ideal<br />

56

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!