Stony Brook University - SUNY Digital Repository
Stony Brook University - SUNY Digital Repository Stony Brook University - SUNY Digital Repository
thought. In those earliest chapters of humanity as well as still today, if only subconsciously, it was believed that it was not through the flesh but through the mind and the soul that humans could commune with their gods. Of this, Dewey writes: The intellect, however, according to the traditional doctrine, may grasp universal Being, and Being which is universal is fixed and immutable. [...] Man's distrust of himself has caused him to desire to get beyond and above himself; in pure knowledge he has thought he could attain this self-transcendence. (7) In short, by approaching certainty, man approached the gods or the universal “Truth,” or “Being” as Dewey put it. And by approaching the gods, man became like the gods, a Master of Reality, or so his ego assured him. Certainty guaranteed the static nature of the reality or “truth” of the world, and humanity’s place in it. Such utter changelessness of the universe was perceived to be an almost godly ordained thing, as, according to Dewey: If a thing changes, its alteration is convincing evidence of its lack of true or complete Being. What is, in the full and pregnant sense of the word, is always, eternally. It is self-contradictory for that which is to alter. If it had no defect or imperfection in it how could it change? (19) And this certainty-exalting “Universal Being” of Dewey’s would seem to indeed be unchanging, at least in a sense, as it, and the “quest” for it, seems to have pervaded human civilization well into “modern” times. It took the form of the natureincarnated gods of earliest man. It took the form of the sun illuminating the eyes of the unshackled prisoner in Plato’s 42
“Allegory of the Cave.” It took the form of the “God” of the prophets and preachers of the Judeo-Christian-Muslim tradition. It took the form of the mathematical laws of the cosmos postulated by René Descartes and, later, Sir Isaac Newton. As Dewey explains it: The belief that the divine encompasses the world was detached from its mythical context and made the basis of philosophy, and it became also the foundation of physical science - as is suggested by the remark that the heavenly bodies are gods. Telling the story of the universe in the form of rational discourse instead of emotionalized imagination signified the discovery of logic as a rational science. Conformity on the part of supreme reality to the requirements of logic conferred upon its constitutive objects necessary and immutable characteristics. Pure contemplation of these forms was man's highest and most divine bliss, a communion with unchangeable truth. (15) It is no exaggeration, then, when Dewey declares in his book that “[t]he quest for certitude has determined our basic metaphysics” (22). Again: certainty. Whether in the purview of religion or science or whatever other undertaking of human society, certainty is sought out because it would seem to promise not simply peace and control, or at the very least a reassuring semblance of them, but also, very well more crucially, an alignment with a “Truth” – “fixed and immutable,” “absolute and unshakeable” – written across the universe. And a pursuit of certainty necessitates a very particular perspective of the world and humanity’s ultimate place and purpose therein. It is a perspective of reality and “truth” that is extremely bipolar 43
- Page 1 and 2: Stony Brook University The official
- Page 3 and 4: Copyright by Leon Marcelo 2011 ii
- Page 5 and 6: Abstract of the Dissertation The Un
- Page 7 and 8: I dedicate this work to my daughter
- Page 9 and 10: Introduction This work is the culmi
- Page 11 and 12: But the way out of this philosophic
- Page 13 and 14: through experiences in the writing
- Page 15 and 16: the same old thing all over again.
- Page 17 and 18: theory and research permeating thro
- Page 19 and 20: I. With no reservations, I call mys
- Page 21 and 22: fill in all of the empty variables.
- Page 23 and 24: now have my doubts, which is what b
- Page 25 and 26: the invisible, hearing the inaudibl
- Page 27 and 28: “problem-posing education”: a
- Page 29 and 30: “uncertainty.” But when it was
- Page 31 and 32: After the study was finished, Perry
- Page 33 and 34: a vehement belief in “writing wit
- Page 35 and 36: philosophies of teaching. In his bo
- Page 37 and 38: until sometime later - after confro
- Page 39 and 40: eginnings of humanity itself. In th
- Page 41 and 42: conversation and, in its place, pag
- Page 43 and 44: [W]hat happened to rhetoric in Amer
- Page 45 and 46: cannot be discussed because they ar
- Page 47 and 48: States of America in the 1800s for
- Page 49: making and doing” (6). And for De
- Page 53 and 54: not a denigration of Christianity,
- Page 55 and 56: severe, black or white: either foll
- Page 57 and 58: easoning behind those words. Early
- Page 59 and 60: transcendent reality and thus satis
- Page 61 and 62: imaginative novelty and creative tr
- Page 63 and 64: eality that the faithful were allow
- Page 65 and 66: with which all other societies were
- Page 67 and 68: field of composition was not, as Co
- Page 69 and 70: ecause of its “epistemological su
- Page 71 and 72: proclamation “Cogito Ergo Sum,”
- Page 73 and 74: This power of modern Western scienc
- Page 75 and 76: under the aegis of Western medicine
- Page 77 and 78: the masters of nature ... Instead o
- Page 79 and 80: and, during this time, “assimilat
- Page 81 and 82: as in specific political, ideologic
- Page 83 and 84: Darkness. For Said, it was in the p
- Page 85 and 86: In its institutionalized form - fre
- Page 87 and 88: III. Before I continue any further,
- Page 89 and 90: It is an unavoidable fact of life.
- Page 91 and 92: Tarnas refers to those “contradic
- Page 93 and 94: news” of such pervasive and overw
- Page 95 and 96: when writers shrink from that uncer
- Page 97 and 98: Uncertainty and the prolonging of U
- Page 99 and 100: falling away to such a “shift”
“Allegory of the Cave.” It took the form of the “God” of the<br />
prophets and preachers of the Judeo-Christian-Muslim tradition.<br />
It took the form of the mathematical laws of the cosmos<br />
postulated by René Descartes and, later, Sir Isaac Newton. As<br />
Dewey explains it:<br />
The belief that the divine encompasses the world was<br />
detached from its mythical context and made the basis<br />
of philosophy, and it became also the foundation of<br />
physical science - as is suggested by the remark that<br />
the heavenly bodies are gods. Telling the story of<br />
the universe in the form of rational discourse<br />
instead of emotionalized imagination signified the<br />
discovery of logic as a rational science. Conformity<br />
on the part of supreme reality to the requirements of<br />
logic conferred upon its constitutive objects<br />
necessary and immutable characteristics. Pure<br />
contemplation of these forms was man's highest and<br />
most divine bliss, a communion with unchangeable<br />
truth. (15)<br />
It is no exaggeration, then, when Dewey declares in his book<br />
that “[t]he quest for certitude has determined our basic<br />
metaphysics” (22).<br />
Again: certainty. Whether in the purview of religion or<br />
science or whatever other undertaking of human society,<br />
certainty is sought out because it would seem to promise not<br />
simply peace and control, or at the very least a reassuring<br />
semblance of them, but also, very well more crucially, an<br />
alignment with a “Truth” – “fixed and immutable,” “absolute and<br />
unshakeable” – written across the universe. And a pursuit of<br />
certainty necessitates a very particular perspective of the<br />
world and humanity’s ultimate place and purpose therein. It is<br />
a perspective of reality and “truth” that is extremely bipolar<br />
43