Stony Brook University - SUNY Digital Repository
Stony Brook University - SUNY Digital Repository Stony Brook University - SUNY Digital Repository
occur because of the nature of a “liberal arts education”? Does such an “evolution” just happen because of the simple presence and proximity of diversity? Although Perry had attested to the almost “cause and effect” nature of those relationships, he had not claimed that their outcome, that “relativism” of his, was something easy to bring about. In the very same way, then, was that potential and promise of “writing with uncertainty” for which I had sung the praises like a devout missionary out to save the world and for which Perry’s findings had become useful explanation and evidence so very easy to realize as well? No. It simply was not. And something I would come to understand, in time, was that, while it was very difficult to fulfill them, it was actually very easy, all too easy, to hinder and even betray them. Those questions confronted me with more frequency and with more insistence while I was working towards my Ph.D. at Stony Brook. They were born out of experiences in the writing classroom that laid bare to me something altogether different happening beneath all that talk of Uncertainty. Zealous efforts to promote that questioning, Uncertainty-raising philosophy of not simply writing but even of life turned into an unknowing dissemination of a certain and, to some degree, authoritative perspective of reality and “truth.” Discourse that offered disparate and contrary perspectives stifled, ironically, out of 24
a vehement belief in “writing with Uncertainty.” Questioning and overtures towards Uncertainty adopted as rhetorical devices simply to satisfy and to earn approval instead of as textual manifestations of a “relativistic” perceiving of the world and those living in it. Taken as a whole, those experiences would come to stand for me as examples of the very fine line between education and indoctrination. What I witnessed with them, in all their threat and contempt, was the privileging, the proving, the promotion of the Certainty of Uncertainty. And because of it, that potential and that promise remained, unfortunately, unknown. After some time had passed, I found myself asking, “Was this what it really meant to ‘write with uncertainty’”? What had happened? And what meaning was I to make of it all? What I had experienced was not only confusing but also disappointing. A good deal of what I had thought I would find with bringing Uncertainty to the teaching of writing had been contradicted. I do not want to sound overdramatic, but, to put things simply, I was disheartened. This was many years ago now. And as they say, with time comes perspective, which I am, now, very grateful for. Taking that proverbial long, hard look back at those experiences, back at my Master’s thesis, back at Bob’s “Rhetorical Theory and the Teaching of Writing” class, I began to see things with some clarity. In my rebellious passion to 25
- Page 1 and 2: Stony Brook University The official
- Page 3 and 4: Copyright by Leon Marcelo 2011 ii
- Page 5 and 6: Abstract of the Dissertation The Un
- Page 7 and 8: I dedicate this work to my daughter
- Page 9 and 10: Introduction This work is the culmi
- Page 11 and 12: But the way out of this philosophic
- Page 13 and 14: through experiences in the writing
- Page 15 and 16: the same old thing all over again.
- Page 17 and 18: theory and research permeating thro
- Page 19 and 20: I. With no reservations, I call mys
- Page 21 and 22: fill in all of the empty variables.
- Page 23 and 24: now have my doubts, which is what b
- Page 25 and 26: the invisible, hearing the inaudibl
- Page 27 and 28: “problem-posing education”: a
- Page 29 and 30: “uncertainty.” But when it was
- Page 31: After the study was finished, Perry
- Page 35 and 36: philosophies of teaching. In his bo
- Page 37 and 38: until sometime later - after confro
- Page 39 and 40: eginnings of humanity itself. In th
- Page 41 and 42: conversation and, in its place, pag
- Page 43 and 44: [W]hat happened to rhetoric in Amer
- Page 45 and 46: cannot be discussed because they ar
- Page 47 and 48: States of America in the 1800s for
- Page 49 and 50: making and doing” (6). And for De
- Page 51 and 52: “Allegory of the Cave.” It took
- Page 53 and 54: not a denigration of Christianity,
- Page 55 and 56: severe, black or white: either foll
- Page 57 and 58: easoning behind those words. Early
- Page 59 and 60: transcendent reality and thus satis
- Page 61 and 62: imaginative novelty and creative tr
- Page 63 and 64: eality that the faithful were allow
- Page 65 and 66: with which all other societies were
- Page 67 and 68: field of composition was not, as Co
- Page 69 and 70: ecause of its “epistemological su
- Page 71 and 72: proclamation “Cogito Ergo Sum,”
- Page 73 and 74: This power of modern Western scienc
- Page 75 and 76: under the aegis of Western medicine
- Page 77 and 78: the masters of nature ... Instead o
- Page 79 and 80: and, during this time, “assimilat
- Page 81 and 82: as in specific political, ideologic
occur because of the nature of a “liberal arts education”? Does<br />
such an “evolution” just happen because of the simple presence<br />
and proximity of diversity? Although Perry had attested to the<br />
almost “cause and effect” nature of those relationships, he had<br />
not claimed that their outcome, that “relativism” of his, was<br />
something easy to bring about. In the very same way, then, was<br />
that potential and promise of “writing with uncertainty” for<br />
which I had sung the praises like a devout missionary out to<br />
save the world and for which Perry’s findings had become useful<br />
explanation and evidence so very easy to realize as well? No.<br />
It simply was not. And something I would come to understand, in<br />
time, was that, while it was very difficult to fulfill them, it<br />
was actually very easy, all too easy, to hinder and even betray<br />
them.<br />
Those questions confronted me with more frequency and with<br />
more insistence while I was working towards my Ph.D. at <strong>Stony</strong><br />
<strong>Brook</strong>. They were born out of experiences in the writing<br />
classroom that laid bare to me something altogether different<br />
happening beneath all that talk of Uncertainty. Zealous efforts<br />
to promote that questioning, Uncertainty-raising philosophy of<br />
not simply writing but even of life turned into an unknowing<br />
dissemination of a certain and, to some degree, authoritative<br />
perspective of reality and “truth.” Discourse that offered<br />
disparate and contrary perspectives stifled, ironically, out of<br />
24