Stony Brook University - SUNY Digital Repository
Stony Brook University - SUNY Digital Repository Stony Brook University - SUNY Digital Repository
“truth” - as well as the concepts of “relativism” and “Perception is reality” – and, pulling back, brought them to the students’ greater existence as “individuals.” At the heart of this second unit, then, was the question, “What is an ‘individual’?” The students were asked what they had been “taught” about the reality or “truth” of the world and their place in it and how this had influenced their perspective of these? Furthermore, they were asked how all of this had affected their standing as “individuals.” To help them try to explore these questions of “education” in the widest definition of the word, they had to read Plato’s “The Allegory of the Cave,” Maureen O’Hara & Walter Anderson’s “Welcome to the Postmodern World,” Doris Lessing’s “Switching Off to See ‘Dallas’,” and Vincent Ruggiero’s “Broaden Your Perspective.” They also watched the 1998 film American History X, a poignant drama about a neo-Nazi skinhead “Derek Vinyard,” played by Edward Norton, who goes to prison for a murder bred by his vicious biases but transforms during his incarceration through seeing himself and his world – as well as his crime and the ideologies that bred them – from a different perspective. After mulling over those questions and this material that were arranged to deepen and complicate them, the second essay, “Your Definition of Your ‘Self’,” required them to do two things. The first was to critically analyze the film using one 180
of the readings and, quoting the assignment demanded in the film of Norton’s younger brother and protégé, “Danny” (Edward Furlong), by a teacher the brothers both had, “Doctor Sweeney” (Avery Brooks), “[T]o analyze and interpret all the events surrounding Derek’s incarceration. How these events helped to shape [his and Danny’s] present perspective concerning life in contemporary America.” In doing so, the students had to explore how Derek’s perspectives had been shaped and molded by his environment, how his standing as an “individual” had been influenced by those experiences, and how, and why, his perceptions had eventually become broadened and “evolved.” The second part of the essay was to bring this analysis to their own lives and worlds: their own sense of “self.” As I wrote for the essay assignment: All of this should lead you to what is truly most important here: YOU. Like "Danny" does with his own essay, through your writing, I want you to “analyze and interpret” your own lives, perspectives, and “individuality.” How have your own perspectives of yourself, the world, and your place in it been affected by your culture, your society, your relations, etc.? Have you gone through life following others' views, others’ definitions of “truth,” without ever questioning them? And what has been the result? What has influenced your definition of your “self” – and what has been the result? These are all questions you must ask yourselves before you can truly claim to be an “individual.” Put simply, half of the essay was an interpretation of American History X while the other half was a comparison of that meaning to how they perceived themselves as “individuals.” Similar to this second unit and the second essay, the third unit pulled back even further and brought those questions of 181
- Page 137 and 138: IV. As a teacher, how do you not be
- Page 139 and 140: urge to “write with Uncertainty,
- Page 141 and 142: his book Embracing Contraries, he e
- Page 143 and 144: iochemical workings of the human bo
- Page 145 and 146: with the densest, most unyielding o
- Page 147 and 148: are, as LuMing Mao explains in his
- Page 149 and 150: a compromise and a retreat, yet ano
- Page 151 and 152: more fully human is curtailed. Eros
- Page 153 and 154: “cooking”: “Between People,
- Page 155 and 156: palpable. To teachers of writing st
- Page 157 and 158: een greatly influenced by this conc
- Page 159 and 160: attribute that movement, that progr
- Page 161 and 162: But this is a somewhat vague answer
- Page 163 and 164: where students perceive “all know
- Page 165 and 166: with a graduation from college or u
- Page 167 and 168: call for thinking. In essence, it i
- Page 169 and 170: Difficulty or obstruction in the wa
- Page 171 and 172: education, but it ends with his con
- Page 173 and 174: is also the rise of the other. But,
- Page 175 and 176: processes? “Morals”? Deliberate
- Page 177 and 178: exactly is that teacher to evoke fo
- Page 179 and 180: The more remote supplies the stimul
- Page 181 and 182: would say a few things about my ped
- Page 183 and 184: to coin wholly new and different mo
- Page 185 and 186: “middling” and Knoblauch’s ow
- Page 187: question of how their educational e
- Page 191 and 192: genetics and chemistry? Or is the i
- Page 193 and 194: ibliography, and a final report, wh
- Page 195 and 196: turned outward, towards society and
- Page 197 and 198: as a whole. These essays attempted
- Page 199 and 200: students had to do it from and for
- Page 201 and 202: teacher staring back at me. A lazy
- Page 203 and 204: ut inwards, to themselves, and to p
- Page 205 and 206: Again, if I took that long, hard lo
- Page 207 and 208: subjectivity” of those same “po
- Page 209 and 210: eflecting writing and those questio
- Page 211 and 212: work” (318). For me, it is this s
- Page 213 and 214: ut what is thought and, possibly, w
- Page 215 and 216: of the “Deweyan” community - th
- Page 217 and 218: question, “Can writing be used to
- Page 219 and 220: Shapiro took those seventy essays a
- Page 221 and 222: instructor’s standing within such
- Page 223 and 224: in responding to drafts, in confere
- Page 225 and 226: elevance of context is what finally
- Page 227 and 228: different composition scholars and
- Page 229 and 230: a human being living in this world
- Page 231 and 232: that “perplexity” and “disequ
- Page 233 and 234: development” (219). If my experie
- Page 235 and 236: e seen as “diverse” or “diffe
- Page 237 and 238: from without, and, because of it, w
of the readings and, quoting the assignment demanded in the film<br />
of Norton’s younger brother and protégé, “Danny” (Edward<br />
Furlong), by a teacher the brothers both had, “Doctor Sweeney”<br />
(Avery <strong>Brook</strong>s), “[T]o analyze and interpret all the events<br />
surrounding Derek’s incarceration. How these events helped to<br />
shape [his and Danny’s] present perspective concerning life in<br />
contemporary America.” In doing so, the students had to explore<br />
how Derek’s perspectives had been shaped and molded by his<br />
environment, how his standing as an “individual” had been<br />
influenced by those experiences, and how, and why, his<br />
perceptions had eventually become broadened and “evolved.” The<br />
second part of the essay was to bring this analysis to their own<br />
lives and worlds: their own sense of “self.” As I wrote for<br />
the essay assignment:<br />
All of this should lead you to what is truly most<br />
important here: YOU. Like "Danny" does with his own<br />
essay, through your writing, I want you to “analyze<br />
and interpret” your own lives, perspectives, and<br />
“individuality.” How have your own perspectives of<br />
yourself, the world, and your place in it been<br />
affected by your culture, your society, your<br />
relations, etc.? Have you gone through life<br />
following others' views, others’ definitions of<br />
“truth,” without ever questioning them? And what has<br />
been the result? What has influenced your definition<br />
of your “self” – and what has been the result? These<br />
are all questions you must ask yourselves before you<br />
can truly claim to be an “individual.”<br />
Put simply, half of the essay was an interpretation of American<br />
History X while the other half was a comparison of that meaning<br />
to how they perceived themselves as “individuals.”<br />
Similar to this second unit and the second essay, the third<br />
unit pulled back even further and brought those questions of<br />
181