Art Criticism - The State University of New York

Art Criticism - The State University of New York Art Criticism - The State University of New York

dspace.sunyconnect.suny.edu
from dspace.sunyconnect.suny.edu More from this publisher
25.12.2013 Views

music that (like the Mona Lisa) has lost any thrust and heat it once had. But the dedicated artist who wants to be like the universally respected spiritual helper of yesteryear must leap over the avant garde esthete's snobbish antithesis of abstraction to the Hegelian synthesis of strong em0tion, using folk elements as compost for communication. One could compare the international style in architecture and in constructivist painting to the musical kit that was sent out from Germany to colonize America in the Eighteenth Century, a Haydnesque basic language that could be easily adapted to the wilderness. Hasn't Abstract Expressionism become even more of such a lingua franca, more flexible and personality-sustaining than Mondrian's and Corbusier's dogma? American music languished in the Nineteenth Century because'of the repla

whose main purpose seems to be to exclude their unpopular schoolmates, they were hard on the arriviste, enthusiastic curiosity here outweighed by length of tenure. Since there were no longer any august judges to appeal top the commune gave all a courage that led paradoxically to timid conservatism. This is the tough-mindedness that P. Pavia spoke for when he said in "It Is" that it was inexcusable for anyone in New York at that time not to know what was going on, revealing the exasperation of the seasoned intellectual pessimist at the wide-eyed parvenu. But there were imaginary as well as real turds in this new garden, and avoiding them led to a cautiousy mumbling, noncommittal stance instead of the initial intention of stretching arms and taking new deep breaths. Here were second-wave pilgrims to whom the new faith did not come so easily, who had to earn back a lost ingenuousness painfully, working gingerly and without much panache with the muddy colors from the slough of despond, not having earned the bright colors of the founding fathers' emblems of vindication. The day will come, believed Duchamp, when we will no longer say "hete comme un peintre." But aside from the birdlike gaiety ofthe neo-dadaists, aren't painters usually a stolid, inarticulate lot? Many have the squat short endomorphic muscularity of Picasso, his phlegmatic peasant wit. And, in their awkward muteness, they usually can say "my kingdom is not of this world." Yet H. Hoffman did not have to tell us (as he did) that our creativity made us as important as anyone else; we had the war's overturning of defunct materialist values as a weapon for our new enfranchisement as official dreamers. One shouldn't look for the correct time in a clock store. We see experts scrutinizing with microscopes paintings it took the artist ten minutes to finish with a wall brush. Or they puzzle over the suicides of certain Slavic painters which probably occurred impulsi'vely (providing philosophical ramifications that will, no doubt encourage their devotees). They are pondering a movement that was only vital before it had any large influence. Vlaminck and Derain painted better as Fauves than as independents, and for the Abstract Expressionists this kind of symbiosis was also nourishing, the group acting as superego against excesses that might cause it to lose own respect. But unsettling insights caused some to drift away, many to oblivion in provincial art worlds where "one man alone just ain't no Goddamn, good." As a person attempting to live alone in the woods will write accounts of his escape from corruption to fortify himself, members of this group would join hands with each other by means of magazines, exhibits, distanced not only by heartbreaking U.S.A. miles but by an urgent wish to go against the grain of the "groups'" growing threat to the fulfillment of their own insistent personnae. Contrary to legend, in only a few cases do the prices of dead artists' w~rk rise. It no longer pays for an artist to die. The public that neglects its great artists, trusting that posterity will vindicate them, is guilty in its materialism of vol. 17, no. 1 15

music that (like the Mona Lisa) has lost any thrust and heat it once had. But the<br />

dedicated artist who wants to be like the universally respected spiritual helper<br />

<strong>of</strong> yesteryear must leap over the avant garde esthete's snobbish antithesis <strong>of</strong><br />

abstraction to the Hegelian synthesis <strong>of</strong> strong em0tion, using folk elements<br />

as compost for communication.<br />

One could compare the international style in architecture and in<br />

constructivist painting to the musical kit that was sent out from Germany to<br />

colonize America in the Eighteenth Century, a Haydnesque basic language<br />

that could be easily adapted to the wilderness. Hasn't Abstract Expressionism<br />

become even more <strong>of</strong> such a lingua franca, more flexible and personality-sustaining<br />

than Mondrian's and Corbusier's dogma? American music languished<br />

in the Nineteenth Century because'<strong>of</strong> the repla

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!