25.12.2013 Views

ABSTRACT Title of Document: BRITISH MODERNIST ... - DRUM

ABSTRACT Title of Document: BRITISH MODERNIST ... - DRUM

ABSTRACT Title of Document: BRITISH MODERNIST ... - DRUM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

memory: a mixture <strong>of</strong> the ordered and the disordered, <strong>of</strong> the stream <strong>of</strong> consciousness<br />

and the judgment <strong>of</strong> the writer. In so doing, The Unfortunates attempts to examine the<br />

epistemological problems <strong>of</strong> memory and narrative as a thing, rather than as a<br />

process—a probing <strong>of</strong> the epistemological problems related to turning events<br />

(particularly, for Johnson, true events) into memories and memories into novels.<br />

This middle layers memory upon memory, as it remembers a day <strong>of</strong><br />

remembering. It questions the accuracy <strong>of</strong> memory even as it attempts to preserve<br />

memory as a fact in itself. It suggests that the apprehension <strong>of</strong> narratives, <strong>of</strong> stories—<br />

<strong>of</strong> beginnings and endings—threatens to distort prior memories, yet it operates within<br />

its own fixed beginning and ending. By giving the reader a choice in the ordering the<br />

text, it suggests the possibility <strong>of</strong> a writerly text—a text whose form and meaning are<br />

subject to the whims and interpretations <strong>of</strong> the reader. But the same randomness<br />

which suggests this possibility also destroys it: the reader has no real choice, beyond<br />

whether and how many times to shuffle the pages. The Unfortunates suggests that,<br />

while memory is unlikely to re-create the exact chronological order <strong>of</strong> events, or even<br />

the order <strong>of</strong> previous acts <strong>of</strong> remembering, it does preserve some <strong>of</strong> time’s original<br />

chronological ordering. What’s more, it maintains a certain confidence that events do<br />

happen in a particular chronological order, and that that chronological order can be<br />

mostly (if not completely) recovered. But it is recovered as an object, not as an<br />

experience. This is what it means for memory to be nominalized: we can gather up<br />

what we know <strong>of</strong> our past, <strong>of</strong> our memories, we can evaluate their veracity, and we<br />

can put them in a box—but we cannot re-create the experience <strong>of</strong> them. We know the<br />

past, and the memories which contain it, happens in time—but we know it only in our<br />

265

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!