25.12.2013 Views

ABSTRACT Title of Document: BRITISH MODERNIST ... - DRUM

ABSTRACT Title of Document: BRITISH MODERNIST ... - DRUM

ABSTRACT Title of Document: BRITISH MODERNIST ... - DRUM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Johnson’s intent, however, is not to produce a writerly novel in the Barthian<br />

sense—a novel that allows the reader to impose upon it different narratives. The<br />

“FIRST” and “LAST” sections; the absence <strong>of</strong> achrony, emphasized by the relative<br />

ease with which many <strong>of</strong> the events can be logically ordered in time; the fact that<br />

each section is a non-arbitrary narrative episode; and the verisimilitudinous, 29<br />

concretely specific content <strong>of</strong> the narrative all suggest that The Unfortunates is no<br />

more writerly than a typical modernist work. That is, while the novel calls attention to<br />

the thing-ness <strong>of</strong> the book—to its ontological status—the poetics <strong>of</strong> this device is<br />

epistemological rather than ontological. Because the ontological status <strong>of</strong> the book<br />

serves as a metaphor for memory, cancer, and other themes <strong>of</strong> the novel, it calls<br />

attention to the meaning <strong>of</strong> the events in the novel, rather than disrupting, permeating,<br />

or destabilizing the diegetic world, which remains in a highly stable fabula. Neither,<br />

however, can we easily classify The Unfortunates as a readerly novel, since its<br />

unconventional form alone makes it particularly difficult to read, and its individual<br />

sections do their best to avoid telling conventional stories about Tony’s life.<br />

Furthermore, changes in the novel’s syuzhet from reading to reading are not the<br />

products <strong>of</strong> the reader’s decisions, imagination, or interpretive framework, but instead<br />

by a form that fixes the syuzhet according to pre-determined laws, though not into a<br />

pre-determined order.<br />

29 Prince defines verisimilitude as, “The quality <strong>of</strong> a text resulting from its degree <strong>of</strong> conformity to a<br />

set <strong>of</strong> ‘truth’ norms that are external to it” (Prince 103). In Johnson’s case, the truth norms are those<br />

<strong>of</strong> rigorous nonfiction—or, rather, <strong>of</strong> Johnson’s very literal interpretation <strong>of</strong> the word “truth.” We<br />

may contrast this to Genette’s examination <strong>of</strong> vraisemblance in 18th-century French discourse,<br />

where verisimiltude more closely resembles Aristotelian probability. Genette finds the norms <strong>of</strong><br />

truth in “generic conventions [that] function as a system <strong>of</strong> natural forces and constraints” (Genette,<br />

“Vraisemblance” 242). Johnson attempts to locate his truth norms outside the realm <strong>of</strong> discourse.<br />

238

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!