25.12.2013 Views

ABSTRACT Title of Document: BRITISH MODERNIST ... - DRUM

ABSTRACT Title of Document: BRITISH MODERNIST ... - DRUM

ABSTRACT Title of Document: BRITISH MODERNIST ... - DRUM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

change his wish into reality. Told by the Guardian that a return to the physical world<br />

“does not rest with me,” Frobisher concentrates on a happy moment from his past (an<br />

encounter with an old laborer named Sykes) and, as a result, “became aware <strong>of</strong> the<br />

earth and could see it from a great height” (122). Frobisher undergoes a final trial, a<br />

largely undescribed encounter with accusers who “waited with infinite patience for<br />

me to accuse myself” (123). Thinking again <strong>of</strong> the Guardian’s words, “Now I<br />

understood. He meant that it depended upon myself. With a cry like that <strong>of</strong> one<br />

emerging from an anæsthetic, I lost consciousness and sped towards my body” (123).<br />

This final blending <strong>of</strong> physical and spiritual experience, in which what may be<br />

happening in the physical world serves as simile for otherworld events, serves as a<br />

final reminder <strong>of</strong> the epistemological problems created by this encounter. Frobisher<br />

willfully interprets what may be authentic spiritual experience—but may be simply a<br />

dream or even his final delusion—and, in so doing, makes his will the determinant <strong>of</strong><br />

his own narrative, and thus <strong>of</strong> life and death.<br />

Perhaps the most important interpretive question posed by Saturnine is the<br />

level <strong>of</strong> authority we should prescribe to the conclusion <strong>of</strong> Frobisher’s near-death<br />

vision. Are the Guardian’s words—and Frobisher’s interpretation <strong>of</strong> them—the<br />

correct way <strong>of</strong> interpreting the self’s place in the world (at least, the world <strong>of</strong> this<br />

novel)? Are the epistemological uncertainties <strong>of</strong> the novel’s middle and the Freudian<br />

splitting <strong>of</strong> the self superceded by the ontological certainties <strong>of</strong> this ending-<strong>of</strong>-themiddle<br />

and the spiritualist rejoining <strong>of</strong> the soul and the body? I have already<br />

suggested that the ending which follows somewhat unsettles the matter, while the<br />

relationship <strong>of</strong> narrator to character points to a continued split <strong>of</strong> the self. However,<br />

218

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!