25.12.2013 Views

ABSTRACT Title of Document: BRITISH MODERNIST ... - DRUM

ABSTRACT Title of Document: BRITISH MODERNIST ... - DRUM

ABSTRACT Title of Document: BRITISH MODERNIST ... - DRUM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

objection to realism: yes, an object may be different according to different points <strong>of</strong><br />

view, but those points <strong>of</strong> view are in turn caused by the object itself. That is, the<br />

spiritual realm <strong>of</strong> Luna, identified by Frobisher according to his training at the<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Mystical Science, is a comprehensive reality, creating, like the omniscient<br />

Realist narrator whom Frobisher briefly imitates, all <strong>of</strong> the perspective that the<br />

observer requires in order to induce the correct effect. That is, it is very much like a<br />

fictional text. The narrator’s description in physical terms the non-physical<br />

impressions <strong>of</strong> a mystical or imaginary world within a fictional text mirrors the<br />

relationship <strong>of</strong> focalization, a visual metaphor, and all attempts to effect “seeing”<br />

through a text, or to describe the representative function <strong>of</strong> a text in visual terms, is<br />

explicitly an impossible task both because there is no real “seeing” to be had, as there<br />

is no physical world to be seen, and also because words are not sight. 24 We have in<br />

Frobisher’s vision, then, the simultaneous collapse <strong>of</strong> both realist representation and<br />

modernist focalization, both the consequence <strong>of</strong> the removal from the novel <strong>of</strong><br />

anything that may be mistaken for the real physical world.<br />

Nevertheless, the mystical world maintains some ties to the material world. In<br />

perhaps the first clue that Frobisher is not in fact deceased, he chooses to move on<br />

from Luna, “not the abiding-place <strong>of</strong> the recently dead,” because “The restless will<br />

awakened within me, and as it did so I became aware <strong>of</strong> the pain in my head” (116).<br />

Frobisher seems to attribute this pain to the laws <strong>of</strong> Luna, but the reader can tie it to<br />

the head injury which has apparently killed him. Furthermore, Frobisher finds himself<br />

24<br />

J. Hillis Miller critiques the terms point <strong>of</strong> view, center <strong>of</strong> consciousness, and focalization<br />

along these lines: they all “evade the fact that novels are made <strong>of</strong> words” (Miller, “Henry James and<br />

‘Focalization’” 124).<br />

213

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!