ABSTRACT - DRUM - University of Maryland
ABSTRACT - DRUM - University of Maryland
ABSTRACT - DRUM - University of Maryland
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
can confine ourselves to studying representations <strong>of</strong> D 2 , D 4 , D 6 , and O(2), which<br />
exhaust all physically relevant possibilities.<br />
2.1.1 BCS Mean Field Theory<br />
Now, we define the superconducting order parameter as<br />
∫<br />
∆ k = ˜f k,k ′〈ĉ −k ′ĉ k ′〉, (2.2)<br />
k ′ ∈BZ<br />
where ˜f k,k ′ = (f k,k ′ ,q=0−f k,−k ′ ,q=0)/2 is the antisymmetrized BCS coupling strength.<br />
Using a Hubbard-Stratonovich decoupling in Eq. (2.1) with q = 0 and ignoring<br />
superconducting fluctuations, we arrive at<br />
∫<br />
Ĥ MF =<br />
(ξ k ĉ † kĉk + 1 2 ∆ kĉ † kĉ† −k + 1 )<br />
2 ∆∗ kĉ −k ĉ k − 1 2<br />
k∈BZ<br />
∫<br />
k,k ′ ∈BZ<br />
∆ ∗ k<br />
˜f<br />
−1<br />
k,k ′ ∆ k ′, (2.3)<br />
with<br />
˜f<br />
−1<br />
k,k ′ being the matrix inverse <strong>of</strong> ˜fk,k ′. By integrating out the fermions we<br />
find the BCS free energy functional expressed in terms <strong>of</strong> ∆. It contains two parts,<br />
F [∆ k ] = F I + F II , with<br />
∫<br />
F I [∆ k ] =−T<br />
F II [∆ k ] = − 1 2<br />
k∈BZ<br />
∫<br />
[<br />
ln 2 cosh 1<br />
]<br />
√ξk 2 2T<br />
+ |∆ k| 2<br />
∆ ∗ k<br />
k,k ′ ∈BZ<br />
(2.4)<br />
˜f<br />
−1<br />
k,k ′ ∆ k ′. (2.5)<br />
2.1.2 Topological Classification<br />
As we have reviewed in Chapter 1, 2D superconductors in class D is characterized<br />
by the topological invariant(the Chern number) as follows [70]<br />
C =<br />
∫<br />
k∈BZ<br />
d 2 k<br />
4π d · ∂ k x<br />
d × ∂ ky d, (2.6)<br />
34