A Genealogy of the Extraterrestrial in American Culture
A Genealogy of the Extraterrestrial in American Culture
A Genealogy of the Extraterrestrial in American Culture
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
harmony with <strong>the</strong> universe (“if you will endeavor to open yourselves more completely to our<br />
touch”) <strong>the</strong>n all good th<strong>in</strong>gs flowed toward you. It was <strong>the</strong> cultivation <strong>of</strong> sensitivity and occult<br />
knowledge (which is provided by some privileged medium, <strong>in</strong> this case, Pelley) along with <strong>the</strong><br />
practice <strong>of</strong> openness that placed one <strong>in</strong> harmony. The message fur<strong>the</strong>r echoed both earlier and<br />
later spiritual and extraterrestrial communication <strong>in</strong> that it s<strong>in</strong>gled out its recipient: “you are <strong>of</strong><br />
that company whose bodies are yet <strong>of</strong> earth but whose eyes are opened to perception <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Truth.” This recurr<strong>in</strong>g harmonial sensibility placed <strong>the</strong> politics that emerged from <strong>the</strong> nexus <strong>of</strong><br />
human-O<strong>the</strong>r communication <strong>in</strong> clear tension with traditional utopian politics. Mak<strong>in</strong>g oneself<br />
“open” was a fundamentally passive, read fem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e, practice, especially when compared to <strong>the</strong><br />
emphasis on organiz<strong>in</strong>g and seizure <strong>of</strong> power associated with traditionally understood political<br />
action. The politics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> displaced utopian imag<strong>in</strong>ary were thoroughly fem<strong>in</strong>ized. The vectors<br />
<strong>of</strong> communication along which its texts were conveyed were watery <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> extreme—entranced,<br />
<strong>in</strong>-between, utterly passive. The sense that a better world was com<strong>in</strong>g was tied ei<strong>the</strong>r to lifeafter-death<br />
or to some anticipated apocalypse <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> world as a whole is ushered <strong>in</strong>to a<br />
new era by <strong>the</strong> actions <strong>of</strong> some vast O<strong>the</strong>r. Here we see <strong>the</strong> implied complement to <strong>the</strong><br />
materialization <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> spiritual. By render<strong>in</strong>g terrestrial political concerns as matters <strong>of</strong> spirit, <strong>the</strong><br />
politics that emerged from <strong>the</strong> nexus <strong>of</strong> human-O<strong>the</strong>r communication spiritualized <strong>the</strong> material.<br />
As we shall see, Pelley straddled <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e between <strong>the</strong> overtly fem<strong>in</strong>ized politics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> displaced<br />
utopian imag<strong>in</strong>ary and <strong>the</strong> more mascul<strong>in</strong>e approaches <strong>of</strong> traditional political organiz<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
action. This tension between mascul<strong>in</strong>e ends (a scientifically based faith, a dramatically altered<br />
socio-political landscape) and fem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e means (act<strong>in</strong>g as a passive conduit for spectral<br />
communiqués, <strong>the</strong> cultivation <strong>of</strong> “openness”) was reflected <strong>in</strong> Pelley’s own ambivalence toward<br />
<strong>the</strong> fem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e.<br />
92