24.12.2013 Views

A Genealogy of the Extraterrestrial in American Culture

A Genealogy of the Extraterrestrial in American Culture

A Genealogy of the Extraterrestrial in American Culture

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

abductee reports that dur<strong>in</strong>g her experience—which <strong>in</strong>volved observ<strong>in</strong>g “a ‘man’ and a ‘horse’<br />

engage <strong>in</strong> sexual contact” and be<strong>in</strong>g anally penetrated by an alien figure—“she was given to<br />

believe…that <strong>the</strong> aliens were carefully monitor<strong>in</strong>g her feel<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> shame, guilt and<br />

humiliation.” 310<br />

The sense <strong>of</strong> shame as central to <strong>the</strong> abduction scenario is also attested to by <strong>the</strong><br />

centrality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> genitals, and later anus, to <strong>the</strong> abduction narrative. This focus on two classical<br />

loci <strong>of</strong> Freudian drives <strong>of</strong>fers yet ano<strong>the</strong>r suggestive l<strong>in</strong>k between abduction and psychoanalysis.<br />

Abduction constitutes an exposure to what Lacan refers to as <strong>the</strong> Real—“<strong>the</strong> realm <strong>of</strong> raw,<br />

unrepresentable fullness prior to <strong>the</strong> organization <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> drives.” 311<br />

Given that <strong>the</strong> anal and<br />

genital are two primary seats <strong>of</strong> that very organization, <strong>the</strong>ir shameful and terrify<strong>in</strong>g recurrence<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> abduction scenario po<strong>in</strong>ts to an encounter that reverberates at <strong>the</strong> most basic levels <strong>of</strong><br />

be<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

The account <strong>of</strong>fered by Lacan to describe what he means by <strong>the</strong> Gaze does not h<strong>in</strong>ge<br />

upon <strong>the</strong> subject be<strong>in</strong>g cast <strong>in</strong>to opacity by enter<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> field <strong>of</strong> vision <strong>of</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r subject. In<br />

Lacan’s account, it is not ano<strong>the</strong>r human be<strong>in</strong>g that casts his own position <strong>of</strong> mastery <strong>in</strong>to<br />

doubt— it is a sard<strong>in</strong>e can. As recounted <strong>in</strong> Four Fundamental Concepts <strong>of</strong> Psychoanalysis,<br />

Lacan was <strong>in</strong> Brittany, out to sea with local fishermen. Referr<strong>in</strong>g to a sard<strong>in</strong>e can float<strong>in</strong>g<br />

nearby, one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> men exclaimed, “You see that can? Do you see it? Well it doesn't see you!”<br />

312 Lacan believed that, <strong>in</strong> some ways, <strong>the</strong> man’s statement was fundamentally untrue—that <strong>the</strong><br />

object does stare back. Lacan’s <strong>in</strong>sight was basically that to see <strong>the</strong> can as “sard<strong>in</strong>e can” or even<br />

as “can” or “conta<strong>in</strong>er” or “metal” was to “see” it through a semiotic veil. This moment <strong>of</strong><br />

clarity experientially revealed to Lacan <strong>the</strong> gap between <strong>the</strong> physiology <strong>of</strong> vision and <strong>the</strong> socially<br />

310 David M. Jacobs, “Subsequent Procedures” <strong>in</strong> Alien Discussions: Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Abduction Study<br />

Conference, ed. Pritchard et al. (Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Press, 1994) 65.<br />

311 Jay, 350.<br />

312 Jacques Lacan, The Four Fundamental Concepts <strong>of</strong> Psycho-analysis (New York: W.W.Norton, 1978) 95.<br />

213

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!