24.12.2013 Views

A Genealogy of the Extraterrestrial in American Culture

A Genealogy of the Extraterrestrial in American Culture

A Genealogy of the Extraterrestrial in American Culture

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

science. 256<br />

The Hill case was <strong>the</strong> start <strong>of</strong> a slow shift with<strong>in</strong> ufology that would lead to humanalien<br />

<strong>in</strong>teraction becom<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> central node <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>quiry <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> study <strong>of</strong> UFO’s. As discussed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

previous chapter, serious researchers <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> UFO phenomena shunned <strong>the</strong> contactee<br />

movement. Contactees, at best, dwelt on <strong>the</strong> fr<strong>in</strong>ges <strong>of</strong> religion. At worst <strong>the</strong>y were engaged <strong>in</strong><br />

calculated fraud. The central po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest for this dissertation, <strong>the</strong> ostensible contact between<br />

humans and be<strong>in</strong>gs not <strong>of</strong> this earth not only held no <strong>in</strong>terest for ma<strong>in</strong>stream ufology--it was an<br />

outright ana<strong>the</strong>ma. Contactees were an embarrassment. It was hard enough to get <strong>the</strong> world to<br />

take unbiased <strong>in</strong>quiry <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> Unidentified Fly<strong>in</strong>g Objects seriously without <strong>the</strong><br />

associated phenomena claimed by <strong>in</strong>dividuals like George Adamski--ongo<strong>in</strong>g journeys to distant<br />

planets and enlightenment ga<strong>in</strong>ed at <strong>the</strong> feet <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terstellar visitors. People like Adamski and <strong>the</strong><br />

claims <strong>the</strong>y made cast ufology as pulp fiction—wishful th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g pos<strong>in</strong>g as science—and ufology<br />

imag<strong>in</strong>ed itself as solely concerned with verifiable facts.<br />

Ufology was concerned with questions <strong>of</strong> physical presence ra<strong>the</strong>r than questions <strong>of</strong><br />

mean<strong>in</strong>g. In its <strong>in</strong>carnation preced<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> advent <strong>of</strong> alien abduction, <strong>the</strong> study <strong>of</strong> UFOs<br />

concerned itself with a much more immediate question. Were <strong>the</strong> objects repeatedly viewed <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> skies over America, and elsewhere, mere fancy or true objects with physical dimensions? It<br />

was primarily <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> former that UFO discourse entered <strong>in</strong>to questions <strong>of</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g. If<br />

UFOs were <strong>the</strong> product <strong>of</strong> fancy, what explanation might be <strong>of</strong>fered for <strong>the</strong> repeated nature <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>ir sight<strong>in</strong>g—suggestibility, mass hysteria, Cold War jitters, <strong>the</strong> power <strong>of</strong> rumor? In <strong>the</strong><br />

positive case, <strong>in</strong> which UFOs were actual objects, <strong>the</strong> goal was not explanation, but verification.<br />

How might it be established that UFOs existed as actual objects?<br />

256 John G. Fuller, Incident at Exeter/The Interrupted Journey: Two Landmark Investigations <strong>of</strong> UFO Encounters <strong>in</strong><br />

One Volume (New York: MJF Books, 1966).<br />

170

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!