A Genealogy of the Extraterrestrial in American Culture
A Genealogy of the Extraterrestrial in American Culture
A Genealogy of the Extraterrestrial in American Culture
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
sign<strong>in</strong>g.” 210 Gill’s amused response was “that great white leader bus<strong>in</strong>ess might happen <strong>in</strong><br />
Hollywood movies about African missionaries, but certa<strong>in</strong>ly not where I was.” Many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
parishioners were educated and fluent <strong>in</strong> English. Fail<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> psychosocial explanation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
parishioners bl<strong>in</strong>dly follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> great bwana, Menzel next went to an astronomical explanation<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ed with perceptual miscues. Menzel suggested that Gill, who suffered from myopia and<br />
astigmatism, had mistaken an “out-<strong>of</strong> -focus, elongated image <strong>of</strong> Venus for his mo<strong>the</strong>r ship.”<br />
The Gill case was fur<strong>the</strong>r complicated by <strong>the</strong> fact that it was a multiple witness sight<strong>in</strong>g and said<br />
witnesses claim to have seen <strong>the</strong> occupants <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> craft. The latter factor places <strong>the</strong> sight<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> category <strong>of</strong> CEIII. The claim that Gill and his parishioners saw animate creatures engaged <strong>in</strong><br />
some unknown task was “expla<strong>in</strong>ed” by Menzel as a function <strong>of</strong> Gills mistak<strong>in</strong>g his eyelash for<br />
an alien, s<strong>in</strong>ce “slight irregularities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ‘hairs’ <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lashes, perhaps dust or moisture, could<br />
easily be <strong>in</strong>terpreted as activity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ‘be<strong>in</strong>gs’.” 211<br />
So how to expla<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fact that 24 o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
witnesses corroborate Gill’s impression? Phillip Klass, who succeeded Menzel as arch-debunker<br />
(and still occupies that position with<strong>in</strong> contemporary UFO debates), po<strong>in</strong>ted to an implied<br />
relation between Gill and Stephen Gill Moi, one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 24 o<strong>the</strong>r witnesses. Klass suggested that<br />
<strong>the</strong> name shared by both men implies k<strong>in</strong>ship and thus conspiracy. Follow<strong>in</strong>g this logic, Gill<br />
Moi supported Gill’s claims as <strong>the</strong> result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir alleged affiliation. Moi’s name “suggests his<br />
close friendship with Gill.” 212 Gill <strong>in</strong> turn related that he had only known Gill Moi for 19<br />
months prior to <strong>the</strong>ir shared experience. “When I arrived on <strong>the</strong> scene, Moi was a man well <strong>in</strong>to<br />
his thirties and he had had that name s<strong>in</strong>ce he was a baby. How could he have been named after<br />
me?” 213<br />
Thus given <strong>the</strong> detailed nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> account and <strong>the</strong> close proximity <strong>of</strong> this encounter,<br />
210 Thompson, 53.<br />
211 Thompson, 54.<br />
212 Thompson, 54.<br />
213 Thompson, 54.<br />
136