Special Issue IOSOT 2013 - Books and Journals
Special Issue IOSOT 2013 - Books and Journals Special Issue IOSOT 2013 - Books and Journals
68 S. Japhet / Vetus Testamentum IOSOT (2013) 36-76 Besides the parallel texts,165 it is found six times in his own narrative, in several variations.166 All these modes of expression are not found in Ezr.-Neh. The stylistic difference is strongly felt where the subject and purpose of the descriptions are the same. Two examples will suffice to demonstrate this: 1) The two books tell us about the free-will donations for the execution of the temple. In Ezr. ii 68-69, the description is “Some of the heads of families, when they came to the house of the Lord which is in Jerusalem, made free-will offerings for the house of the Lord to erect it on its site; according to their ability they gave to the treasury of the work sixty-one thousand darics of gold, five thousands mine of silver and one hundred priests’ garments”. In Chr. xxix 6ff., it is as follows: “Then the heads of father’ houses made their freewill offerings as did also the leaders of the tribes, the commanders . . . and the officers . . . They gave . . . five thousand talents of silver, eighteen thousand talents of bronze and a hundred thousand talents of iron167 and whoever had precious stones gave them to the treasury of the house of the Lord. . . . Then the people rejoiced because they had given willingly, for with a whole heart they had offered freely to the Lord. David the King also rejoiced grately”. 2) The other occasion is the making of a covenant, which again is described in both books: In Neh. x 28-29 (29-30): “The rest of the people . . . all who have knowledge and understanding join with their brethren, their nobles and enter into a curse and an oath to walk in God’s law which was given by Moses . . . and to observe and do all the commandments of the Lord, our Lord, and his ordinances and his statutes”. And in 2 Chr. xv 12-15: “And they entered into a covenant to seek the Lord the God of their fathers with all their heart and with all their soul and that whoever would not seek the Lord, the God of Israel should be put to death. They took oath to the Lord with a loud voice and with shouting and with trumpets and with horns, and all Judah rejoiced over the oath for they had sworn with all their heart and had sought him with all their desire and he was found by them and the Lord gave them rest round about”. The difference is immediately apparent. The descriptions of Ezr.-Neh. are short, dry and matter of fact. They describe only external facts and minimize the description of the ceremony. Those of Chr. are elaborate and pompous, describing in detail the inner feeling of the participants and giving a tinge 165) 2 Chr. vi 14, 38 // 1 Ki. viii 23, 48; 2 Chr. xxxiv 31 // 2 Ki. xxiii 3. 166) 1 Chr. xxii 19; 2 Chr. xv 12, 15; xxii 9, xxx 19; xxxi 21. 167) On the difference in the numbers, cf. M. H. Segal, Tarbiz XIV (Hebrew), p. 85.
S. Japhet / Vetus Testamentum IOSOT (2013) 36-76 69 of exaggeration to every aspect mentioned. The special style of the Chr. is achieved, among other things, through the abundant use and repetition of fixed pregnant literary formulas. השחית .I The root ,שחת mainly in Hifʿil, is quite frequent in the O.T. Nevertheless, it can be regarded as a favourite of the Chr., as it frequently occurs in his account. In two places he depends on his sources: 1 Chr. xxi 15 (2 Sam. xxiv 16);168 2 Chr. xxi 7 // 2 Ki. viii 19. In several places שחת displaces another root of the sources or is added to the original text. For example: To 2 Sam. xxiv 3: “Or shall there be three days pestilence in your land”, the Chr. adds (in 1 Chr. xxi 12): “and the angel of the Lord destroying” .(משחית) In 2 Kings viii 27: “and he did what was evil in the sight of the Lord for he was son-in-law to the house of Ahab”, here, again, )למשחית לו) undoing” the Chr. adds: “for . . . they were his counselors to his (2 Chr. xxiv 4). A similar procedure is followed in 2 Chr. xxvii 2 (2 Ki. xv 35); 2 Chr. xxxiv 11 (2 Ki. xxii 5-6). Apart from these, the verb is used in the Chr.’s own narrative.169 In Ezr.-Neh. it is totally absent, although the opportunities to use it are many. אמץ .K From earlier literature the Chr. derives the phrase ואמץ“ Be“—”חזק strong and of good courage” as well as the verb אמץ itself, and weaves it into his composition. 1 Chr. xxii 13 ואמץ אל תירא ואל תחת“ ”חזק is taken literally from Jos. × 25, Deut. xxxi 6 and other verses;170 2 Chr. xxxvi 13: “He stiffened his neck and hardened (ויאמץ) his heart” is clearly dependent on Deut. ii 30.171 168) There are some differences between these texts. The parallel in 2 Sam. xxiv 16 is somewhat different. The main linguistic difference is between לשחתה in Piʿel and להשחיתה in Hif ʿil. The Hif ʿil in this root is generally more frequent than the Piᶜel. It should be asked, however, whether it is additional proof of the strengthening of Hifᶜil. Cf. above p. 348 n. 2. 169) 2 Chr. xii 7, 12, xx 23; xxiv 23; xxv 16; xxvi 16; xxxv 21; xxxvi 19. אל תירא ואל 170) The same phrase occurs also in 2 Chr. xxviii 20 and 2 Chr. xxxii 7. The phrase in itself occurs twice more in Chr., in 2 Chr. xx 15, 17. This phrase as well is absent from תחת Ezr.-Neh. 171) The dependence on Deut. is not felt in the RSV which translates differently in those places. In “כי הקשה ה׳ 30: Deut. v ”ויקש את ערפו ויאמץ את לבבו” 13: Hebrew it runs as follows: 2 Chr. xxxvi .אלהיך את רוחו ואמץ את לבבו”
- Page 21 and 22: A. Alt / Vetus Testamentum IOSOT (2
- Page 23 and 24: A. Alt / Vetus Testamentum IOSOT (2
- Page 25 and 26: A. Alt / Vetus Testamentum IOSOT (2
- Page 27 and 28: A. Alt / Vetus Testamentum IOSOT (2
- Page 29 and 30: Vetus Testamentum IOSOT (2013) 25-2
- Page 31 and 32: H. L. Ginsberg / Vetus Testamentum
- Page 33 and 34: Vetus Testamentum IOSOT (2013) 29-3
- Page 35 and 36: P. Winter / Vetus Testamentum IOSOT
- Page 37 and 38: M. Kessler / Vetus Testamentum IOSO
- Page 39 and 40: M. Kessler / Vetus Testamentum IOSO
- Page 41 and 42: S. Japhet / Vetus Testamentum IOSOT
- Page 43 and 44: S. Japhet / Vetus Testamentum IOSOT
- Page 45 and 46: S. Japhet / Vetus Testamentum IOSOT
- Page 47 and 48: C. Hif ʿil The same rules apply he
- Page 49 and 50: S. Japhet / Vetus Testamentum IOSOT
- Page 51 and 52: S. Japhet / Vetus Testamentum IOSOT
- Page 53 and 54: S. Japhet / Vetus Testamentum IOSOT
- Page 55 and 56: S. Japhet / Vetus Testamentum IOSOT
- Page 57 and 58: S. Japhet / Vetus Testamentum IOSOT
- Page 59 and 60: S. Japhet / Vetus Testamentum IOSOT
- Page 61 and 62: S. Japhet / Vetus Testamentum IOSOT
- Page 63 and 64: S. Japhet / Vetus Testamentum IOSOT
- Page 65 and 66: S. Japhet / Vetus Testamentum IOSOT
- Page 67 and 68: S. Japhet / Vetus Testamentum IOSOT
- Page 69 and 70: S. Japhet / Vetus Testamentum IOSOT
- Page 71: S. Japhet / Vetus Testamentum IOSOT
- Page 75 and 76: S. Japhet / Vetus Testamentum IOSOT
- Page 77 and 78: S. Japhet / Vetus Testamentum IOSOT
- Page 79 and 80: S. Japhet / Vetus Testamentum IOSOT
- Page 81 and 82: Vetus Testamentum IOSOT (2013) 77-8
- Page 83 and 84: W. Zimmerli / Vetus Testamentum IOS
- Page 85 and 86: W. Zimmerli / Vetus Testamentum IOS
- Page 87 and 88: W. Zimmerli / Vetus Testamentum IOS
- Page 89 and 90: W. Zimmerli / Vetus Testamentum IOS
- Page 91 and 92: Vetus Testamentum IOSOT (2013) 87-9
- Page 93 and 94: A. Lemaire / Vetus Testamentum IOSO
- Page 95 and 96: A. Lemaire / Vetus Testamentum IOSO
- Page 97 and 98: A. Lemaire / Vetus Testamentum IOSO
- Page 99 and 100: A. Lemaire / Vetus Testamentum IOSO
- Page 101 and 102: A. Lemaire / Vetus Testamentum IOSO
- Page 103 and 104: Vetus Testamentum IOSOT (2013) 99-1
- Page 105 and 106: D. Pardee / Vetus Testamentum IOSOT
- Page 107 and 108: D. Pardee / Vetus Testamentum IOSOT
- Page 109 and 110: D. Pardee / Vetus Testamentum IOSOT
- Page 111 and 112: D. Pardee / Vetus Testamentum IOSOT
- Page 113 and 114: Vetus Testamentum IOSOT (2013) 109-
- Page 115 and 116: J. A. Emerton / Vetus Testamentum I
- Page 117 and 118: Vetus Testamentum IOSOT (2013) 113-
- Page 119 and 120: D. T. Tsumura / Vetus Testamentum I
68 S. Japhet / Vetus Testamentum <strong>IOSOT</strong> (<strong>2013</strong>) 36-76<br />
Besides the parallel texts,165 it is found six times in his own narrative, in<br />
several variations.166<br />
All these modes of expression are not found in Ezr.-Neh. The stylistic difference<br />
is strongly felt where the subject <strong>and</strong> purpose of the descriptions are the<br />
same. Two examples will suffice to demonstrate this:<br />
1) The two books tell us about the free-will donations for the execution of<br />
the temple. In Ezr. ii 68-69, the description is “Some of the heads of families,<br />
when they came to the house of the Lord which is in Jerusalem, made free-will<br />
offerings for the house of the Lord to erect it on its site; according to their ability<br />
they gave to the treasury of the work sixty-one thous<strong>and</strong> darics of gold, five<br />
thous<strong>and</strong>s mine of silver <strong>and</strong> one hundred priests’ garments”. In Chr. xxix 6ff.,<br />
it is as follows: “Then the heads of father’ houses made their freewill offerings as<br />
did also the leaders of the tribes, the comm<strong>and</strong>ers . . . <strong>and</strong> the officers . . . They<br />
gave . . . five thous<strong>and</strong> talents of silver, eighteen thous<strong>and</strong> talents of bronze<br />
<strong>and</strong> a hundred thous<strong>and</strong> talents of iron167 <strong>and</strong> whoever had precious stones<br />
gave them to the treasury of the house of the Lord. . . . Then the people rejoiced<br />
because they had given willingly, for with a whole heart they had offered freely<br />
to the Lord. David the King also rejoiced grately”.<br />
2) The other occasion is the making of a covenant, which again is described<br />
in both books: In Neh. x 28-29 (29-30): “The rest of the people . . . all who have<br />
knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing join with their brethren, their nobles <strong>and</strong> enter<br />
into a curse <strong>and</strong> an oath to walk in God’s law which was given by Moses . . . <strong>and</strong><br />
to observe <strong>and</strong> do all the comm<strong>and</strong>ments of the Lord, our Lord, <strong>and</strong> his ordinances<br />
<strong>and</strong> his statutes”. And in 2 Chr. xv 12-15: “And they entered into a covenant<br />
to seek the Lord the God of their fathers with all their heart <strong>and</strong> with all<br />
their soul <strong>and</strong> that whoever would not seek the Lord, the God of Israel should<br />
be put to death. They took oath to the Lord with a loud voice <strong>and</strong> with shouting<br />
<strong>and</strong> with trumpets <strong>and</strong> with horns, <strong>and</strong> all Judah rejoiced over the oath for they<br />
had sworn with all their heart <strong>and</strong> had sought him with all their desire <strong>and</strong> he<br />
was found by them <strong>and</strong> the Lord gave them rest round about”.<br />
The difference is immediately apparent. The descriptions of Ezr.-Neh. are<br />
short, dry <strong>and</strong> matter of fact. They describe only external facts <strong>and</strong> minimize<br />
the description of the ceremony. Those of Chr. are elaborate <strong>and</strong> pompous,<br />
describing in detail the inner feeling of the participants <strong>and</strong> giving a tinge<br />
165) 2 Chr. vi 14, 38 // 1 Ki. viii 23, 48; 2 Chr. xxxiv 31 // 2 Ki. xxiii 3.<br />
166) 1 Chr. xxii 19; 2 Chr. xv 12, 15; xxii 9, xxx 19; xxxi 21.<br />
167) On the difference in the numbers, cf. M. H. Segal, Tarbiz XIV (Hebrew), p. 85.