Studie "The GMO-emperor has no clothes" (engl.) - Nabu
Studie "The GMO-emperor has no clothes" (engl.) - Nabu
Studie "The GMO-emperor has no clothes" (engl.) - Nabu
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
as their democratic right to information and<br />
choice. However, consumer rights were defined<br />
by the US trade representative as “arbitrary,<br />
politicized and scientifically unjustified” rules.<br />
<strong>The</strong> insistence of consumers to pursue “<strong>no</strong>nscience<br />
based restrictions” would lead to a “trade<br />
war of major dimensions.”<br />
In a letter to the US Secretary on June 12th,<br />
1997, US agribusiness corporations stated<br />
the segregation of crops for labeling is both<br />
scientifically unjustified and commercially<br />
unfeasible.<br />
According to US industry, labeling of foods<br />
violates the WTO agreement on free trade.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Sanitary and Phyto-Sanitary measures in<br />
WTO are thus viewed by industry as protecting<br />
their interests. But the right to information is<br />
about democracy and democratic rights can<strong>no</strong>t<br />
be sanctioned by arbitrary tech<strong>no</strong>cratic and<br />
corporate decision making about what is ‘sound<br />
science’ and what is <strong>no</strong>t.<br />
<strong>The</strong> denial of labelling is one dimension of<br />
totalitarian structures associated with the<br />
introduction of genetical engineering in food<br />
and agriculture. Navdanya filed a case in India<br />
demanding labeling of GM foods but the direct<br />
intervention by the US embassy prevented<br />
the labeling law from being introduced by the<br />
Indian Health Ministry.<br />
On July 5, 2011 Codex Alimentarius, the<br />
international food safety body, recognized the<br />
right of countries to label <strong>GMO</strong> foods. This<br />
ended twenty years of an international struggle.<br />
As the Consumer International states: “<strong>The</strong><br />
new Codex agreement means that any country<br />
wishing to adopt GM food labeling will <strong>no</strong><br />
longer face the threat of a legal challenge from<br />
the World Trade Organization (WTO). This<br />
is because national measures based on Codex<br />
guidance or standards can<strong>no</strong>t be challenged as a<br />
barrier to trade.”(http://foodfreedom.wordpress.com/<br />
2011/07/05/codex-alimentarius-adopts-labeling-ofgenetically-modified-foods/).<br />
We <strong>no</strong>w need to build on this right-to–k<strong>no</strong>w<br />
principle and ensure <strong>GMO</strong> labeling in all<br />
countries.<br />
<strong>GMO</strong>s are an Issue of Food<br />
Democracy<br />
This is why GE crops are an issue for<br />
democracy. Food democracy is everyone’s right<br />
and responsibility. We have food democracy<br />
when we can exercise our choice to have<br />
<strong>GMO</strong> free seed and food. This choice is being<br />
undermined as seed is genetically engineered<br />
and patented, as food systems are increasingly<br />
controlled by giant corporations, as chemical<br />
pollution and genetic pollution spread<br />
uncontrolled, making our food unsafe. Each<br />
of us must defend our food freedom and urge<br />
our governments to protect the rights of their<br />
citizens and stop supporting corporate takeover<br />
of our seeds and foods. Each of us is vital in<br />
creating food democracy. We invite you to join<br />
us to defend the most fundamental freedom: our<br />
food freedom.<br />
* Vandana Shiva, distinguished Indian physicist<br />
environmentalist, and campaigner for sustainabilitiy<br />
and social justice. Director/Founder of <strong>The</strong> Research<br />
Foundation for Science, Tech<strong>no</strong>logy and Ecology<br />
(RFSTE) and Director/Founder of Navdanya. She<br />
is the author of numerous books and the recipient of<br />
a number of awards, including the Right Livelihood<br />
Award and most recently the Sydney Peace Prize.<br />
26