23.12.2013 Views

Studie "The GMO-emperor has no clothes" (engl.) - Nabu

Studie "The GMO-emperor has no clothes" (engl.) - Nabu

Studie "The GMO-emperor has no clothes" (engl.) - Nabu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

utterfly. Navdanya’s studies have shown that<br />

soil micro-organisms are negatively affected.<br />

<strong>The</strong> primary justification for the genetic<br />

engineering of Bt into crops is that this will<br />

reduce the use of insecticides. Bt cotton is among<br />

the ‘miracles’ being pushed by corporations like<br />

Monsanto as a solution to the pesticide crisis. One<br />

of the Monsanto brochures had a picture of a few<br />

worms and stated, “You will see these in your<br />

cotton and that’s O.K. Don’t spray.” However, in<br />

Texas, Monsanto faced a lawsuit filed by 25 farmers<br />

over Bt cotton planted on 18,000 acres which<br />

suffered cotton bollworm damage and on which<br />

farmers had to use pesticides in spite of corporate<br />

propaganda that genetic engineering meant an end<br />

to the pesticide era. In 1996, two million acres in<br />

the US were planted with Monsanto’s transgenic<br />

Bollgard cotton.<br />

However, cotton bollworms were found to<br />

have infested thousands of acres planted with<br />

the new breed of cotton in Texas. Not only did<br />

the genetically engineered cotton <strong>no</strong>t survive<br />

cotton bollworm attack, there are also fears that<br />

the strategy will create super bugs by inducing<br />

Bt – resistance in pests. <strong>The</strong> question is <strong>no</strong>t<br />

whether super-pests will be created, but when<br />

they will become dominant. <strong>The</strong> fact that the<br />

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of the<br />

US requires refugia of <strong>no</strong>n-engineered crops to<br />

be planted near the engineered crops reflects the<br />

reality of the creation of resistant strains of insects.<br />

<strong>The</strong> widespread use of Bt containing crops<br />

could accelerate the development of insect pest<br />

resistance to Bt which is used for organic pest<br />

control. Already eight species of insects have<br />

developed resistance to Bt toxins, either in the field<br />

or laboratory, including the diamond back moth,<br />

Indian meal moth, tobacco budworm, Colorado<br />

potato beetle, and two species of mosquitoes.<br />

A new Super Pest which <strong>has</strong> become Resistant to GM Corn<br />

<strong>The</strong> genetically engineered Bt crops continuously<br />

express the Bt toxin throughout its growing<br />

season. Long term exposure to Bt toxins promotes<br />

development of resistance in insect populations,<br />

this kind of exposure could lead to selection for<br />

resistance in all stages of the insect pest on all parts<br />

of the plant for the entire season.<br />

Due to this risk of pest resistance, the EPA offers<br />

only conditional and temporary registration of<br />

varieties producing Bt. <strong>The</strong> EPA requires four<br />

percent ‘refugia’ with Bt cotton, meaning four<br />

percent of planted cotton is conventional and<br />

does <strong>no</strong>t express the Bt toxin. It therefore acts<br />

as a refuge for insects to survive and breed, and<br />

hence keeps the overall level of resistance in the<br />

population low. Even at a 4 percent refugia level,<br />

insect resistance will evolve in as little as three to<br />

four years.<br />

Herbicide Resistant Crops: A Recipe for<br />

Superweeds<br />

Herbicide resistant crops such as Roundup Ready<br />

cotton can create the risk of herbicide resistant<br />

“superweeds” by transferring the herbicide<br />

resistance to weeds. Monsanto <strong>has</strong> confirmed<br />

that a <strong>no</strong>torious Australian weed, rye grass, <strong>has</strong><br />

developed tolerance to its herbicide Roundup,<br />

thus rendering genetic engineering of herbicide<br />

resistant crops a useless strategy.<br />

In 1994, research scientists in Denmark reported<br />

strong evidence that an oilseed rape plant<br />

genetically engineered to be herbicide tolerant<br />

transmitted its transgene to a weedy natural<br />

relative, Brassica campestris ssp. Campestris. This<br />

transfer can become established in the plant in just<br />

two generations.<br />

In Denmark, B. campestris is a common weed<br />

in cultivated oilseed rape fields, where selective<br />

elimination by herbicides is <strong>no</strong>w impossible. <strong>The</strong><br />

wild relative of this weed is spread over large<br />

parts of the world. One way to assess the risk of<br />

releasing transgenic oilseed rape is to measure the<br />

rate of natural hybridization with B. campestris,<br />

because certain transgenes could make its wild<br />

relative a more aggressive weed, and even harder to<br />

control.<br />

Although crosses with B. campestris have been<br />

used in the breeding of oilseed rape, natural<br />

interspecific crosses with oilseed rape was<br />

generally thought to be rare. Artificial crosses by<br />

hand pollination carried out in a risk assessment<br />

project in the U.K were reported unsuccessful.<br />

However, a few studies have reported spontaneous<br />

hybridization between oilseed rape and the<br />

parental species B. campestris in field experiments.<br />

As early as 1962, hybridization rates of zero percent<br />

to 88 percent were measured for oilseed rape and<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!