Studie "The GMO-emperor has no clothes" (engl.) - Nabu
Studie "The GMO-emperor has no clothes" (engl.) - Nabu
Studie "The GMO-emperor has no clothes" (engl.) - Nabu
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
I. INTRODUCTION<br />
Dr. Vandana Shiva*<br />
People who point out the emptiness of the pretensions of powerful people and institutions<br />
are often compared to the child in Hans Christian Andersen’s fable who says that the<br />
<strong>emperor</strong> <strong>has</strong> <strong>no</strong> clothes.<br />
We have been repeatedly told that genetically<br />
engineered (GE) crops will save the world by<br />
increasing yields and producing more food. <strong>The</strong>y<br />
will save the world by controlling pests and<br />
weeds. <strong>The</strong>y will save the world by reducing<br />
chemical use in agriculture. <strong>The</strong>y will save the<br />
world with GE drought tolerant seeds and other<br />
seed traits that will provide resilience in times of<br />
climate change.<br />
However, the GE <strong>emperor</strong> (Monsanto) <strong>has</strong> <strong>no</strong><br />
clothes. All of these claims have been established<br />
as false over years of experience all across<br />
the world. <strong>The</strong> Global Citizens Report “<strong>The</strong><br />
Emperor Has No Clothes” brings together<br />
evidence from the ground of Monsanto’s<br />
and the industry’s false promises and failed<br />
tech<strong>no</strong>logy.<br />
Failure to Yield<br />
Contrary to the claim of feeding the world,<br />
genetic engineering <strong>has</strong> <strong>no</strong>t increased the yield<br />
of a single crop. Navdanya’s research in India<br />
<strong>has</strong> shown that contrary to Monsanto’s claim of<br />
Bt cotton yield of 1500 kg per acre, the reality<br />
is that the yield is an average of 400-500 kg per<br />
acre. Although Monsanto’s Indian advertising<br />
campaign reports a 50 percent increase in yields<br />
for its Bollgard cotton, a survey conducted<br />
by the Research Foundation for Science,<br />
Tech<strong>no</strong>logy and Ecology found that the yields in<br />
all trial plots were lower than what the company<br />
promised.<br />
Bollgard’s failure to deliver higher yields<br />
<strong>has</strong> been reported all over the world. <strong>The</strong><br />
Mississippi Seed Arbitration Council ruled that<br />
in 1997, Monsanto’s Roundup Ready cotton<br />
failed to perform as advertised, recommending<br />
payments of nearly $2 million to three cotton<br />
farmers who suffered severe crop losses.<br />
Failure to Yield, a report by the Union of<br />
Concerned Scientists in the U.S., <strong>has</strong> established<br />
that genetic engineering <strong>has</strong> <strong>no</strong>t contributed to<br />
yield increases in any crop. According to this<br />
report, increases in crop yields in the U.S. are<br />
due to yield characteristics of conventional crops,<br />
<strong>no</strong>t genetic engineering.<br />
Australian research shows that conventional crops<br />
outperform GE crops.<br />
Yield Comparison of GE Ca<strong>no</strong>la<br />
trials in Australia<br />
2001<br />
Conventional 1144<br />
Round Up 1055 (Two application<br />
Ready GE<br />
of Round Up)<br />
977 (One application<br />
of Round Up)<br />
(Source: Monsanto, as reported in Foster (2003)<br />
– http://www.<strong>no</strong>n-gm-farmers.com/documents/GM<br />
Ca<strong>no</strong>la report-full.pdf<br />
New South Wale 2001<br />
In Vigor (GE) 109<br />
Hyola (Conventional) 120<br />
(Source: Bayer Crop Science Website)<br />
Despite Monsanto adding the Roundup Ready<br />
gene to ‘elite varieties’, the best Australian trials of<br />
11