Nordzucker_GB 03-04_E_.pd 1 - Nordzucker AG

Nordzucker_GB 03-04_E_.pd 1 - Nordzucker AG Nordzucker_GB 03-04_E_.pd 1 - Nordzucker AG

23.12.2013 Views

Foreword World sugar production and share of sugar traded on the world market (in m. tonnes raw sugar values) 150 100 World market exports based on origin (in m. tonnes raw sugar values) 30 20 10 50 Beet and cane sugar production (worldwide in m. tonnes raw sugar values) 0 350 250 0 1994 1996 150. 0 1985 Beet sugar 39 1990 2002 1995 2000 2002 World market prices for sugar 1994 – 2004 Cane sugar 103 World sugar production Of which, sugar traded on world market 1998 2000 2002 Sugar traded on the world market Austraia Thailand Brazil EU White Sugar G/t fob White Sugar $/t fob 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 from a liberalised world trade would suffer similar market irritations, and the ACP and LDC countries soon started to call for “adequate EU sugar prices”. By March 2004 at the latest all sides saw that it would be difficult to implement the price markdown option favoured by the Commission. Now, the option “quotas for all” is up for discussion. Although mentioned in the original Commission paper, the Commission itself had not given serious thought to this option up to that point. However, it soon turned out that the option “quotas for all at acceptable prices” has aroused the lasciviousness of all players in the world sugar market. ACP, LDC, Mercosur, the producers of isoglucose, as well as Balkan countries are trying either to maintain or expand their quotas. Furthermore, Brazil, Thailand and Australia, who as the largest producers of surplus sugar are not entitled to any quotas, have brought an action before the WTO expressing doubt on the compatibility of European re-exports of ACP sugar and C-sugar exports with the principles of the WTO. It is as yet difficult to foresee the outcome of these discussions. The risk that “region-wide quota concessions to all” may herald the end of sugar beet cultivation in Europe is clearly evident for everyone. However, this is something nobody – not even the most adamant critics of the market regulations – really wants. Sources: White Sugar Exchange, London; International Sugar Organisation (ISO) 4

In talks in recent months with politicians of the European Parliament, as well as with members of the Bundestag and Land Parliaments, we have expressed our concerns that the sugar market regulations may be abandoned all too easily. All political parties have made it quite clear that they fully appreciated our position. We are determined to continue to use all our arguments in favour of maintaining sugar beet cultivation in the EU, and we will defend our interests in a matter-offact and politically adequate manner, which is exactly what the other sugar producers outside the EU are doing: protecting their own interests. However, it is not only important to stave off superficial financial interests, but to call on the other sugar producing countries to gradually introduce comparable social and environmental standards. Nevertheless, we should not harbour any illusions as to the long-term prospects: even though it may be a very slow process, the world market will be deregulated step by step. More and more tariff and non-tariff trade barriers will come down, and we will have to face the challenge of increasing competition. For all of us – beet farmers and sugar producers alike – this can only mean that we must have the best seed stock, the most efficient methods of cultivation, the most rational harvesting and the bestpriced sugar production methods, but also that we meet our customers’ requirements on time, quantity, true to specifications and at low cost. Our beet farmers as well as our staff have to be well trained and as competent in their jobs as possible. In their actions and thoughts they have to be forward looking and goal-oriented, they need to be able to react flexibly and on constant lookout for alternatives. Then – and only then – will there be no need for us to be concerned at all about an increasingly liberalised world market. This is what will guide our joint efforts! Supported by the full commitment of our staff and the confidence of our shareholders, we will continue to successfully nurture Nordzucker along this path. Nordzucker 2003/2004 5

Foreword<br />

World sugar production and share of sugar traded<br />

on the world market (in m. tonnes raw sugar values)<br />

150<br />

100<br />

World market exports based on origin<br />

(in m. tonnes raw sugar values)<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

50<br />

Beet and cane sugar production<br />

(worldwide in m. tonnes raw sugar values)<br />

0<br />

350<br />

250<br />

0<br />

1994 1996<br />

150.<br />

0<br />

1985<br />

Beet sugar<br />

39<br />

1990<br />

2002<br />

1995 2000 2002<br />

World market prices for sugar 1994 – 20<strong>04</strong><br />

Cane sugar<br />

1<strong>03</strong><br />

World sugar<br />

production<br />

Of which,<br />

sugar<br />

traded on<br />

world<br />

market<br />

1998 2000 2002<br />

Sugar traded on the<br />

world market<br />

Austraia<br />

Thailand<br />

Brazil<br />

EU<br />

White Sugar G/t fob<br />

White Sugar $/t fob<br />

1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 20<strong>03</strong> 20<strong>04</strong><br />

from a liberalised world trade would<br />

suffer similar market irritations, and the<br />

ACP and LDC countries soon started to<br />

call for “adequate EU sugar prices”. By<br />

March 20<strong>04</strong> at the latest all sides saw<br />

that it would be difficult to implement<br />

the price markdown option favoured by<br />

the Commission. Now, the option “quotas<br />

for all” is up for discussion. Although<br />

mentioned in the original Commission<br />

paper, the Commission itself had not<br />

given serious thought to this option up<br />

to that point.<br />

However, it soon turned out that the<br />

option “quotas for all at acceptable<br />

prices” has aroused the lasciviousness of<br />

all players in the world sugar market.<br />

ACP, LDC, Mercosur, the producers of<br />

isoglucose, as well as Balkan countries are<br />

trying either to maintain or expand their<br />

quotas. Furthermore, Brazil, Thailand and<br />

Australia, who as the largest producers of<br />

surplus sugar are not entitled to any quotas,<br />

have brought an action before the<br />

WTO expressing doubt on the compatibility<br />

of European re-exports of ACP sugar<br />

and C-sugar exports with the principles<br />

of the WTO.<br />

It is as yet difficult to foresee the outcome<br />

of these discussions. The risk that<br />

“region-wide quota concessions to all”<br />

may herald the end of sugar beet cultivation<br />

in Europe is clearly evident for everyone.<br />

However, this is something nobody<br />

– not even the most adamant critics of<br />

the market regulations – really wants.<br />

Sources: White Sugar Exchange, London; International Sugar Organisation (ISO)<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!