SUPREME COURT BANKRUPTCY RULING THREATENS COLLECTIVE BARGAINING Organized labor will step up ItS efforts to move Congress to amend the federal bankruptcy code as a result <strong>of</strong> the recem U.S. Supreme Court mhng which permits even solvent compames to ImmedIately cancel umon contracts by Ahog for bankruptcy. Pluggmg what labor considers to be a gaping and unfair loophole In the bankruptcy law now "has the lOp prlom)' on labor's agenda, -, AFL-C10 Legislative DIrector Ray ncm.~on hll .~ ~:l1cl Labor leaders attendmg the AFL·CIO Executive Council meeting In Sal Harbour, Florida, when the deciSion was handed down expressed dismay Imd anger. Bm they added that the ruling W3S not u nexpected and thaI legislation has been introduced to correct H . The AFL-CIO, saId the Council, will "do everything in ItS power to ensure that Congress corrects the Supreme Court mistakc and vindicates national labor policy." The CounCil declared, "The Supreme Court <strong>of</strong> the United St:ltes, in accordance with It s normal pro-business lealllngs, has now granted employers Wide permission to use the banknlptcy laws to destIoy collecuve bargallllng agreements_ "The Supreme Court was able to make tlll:S JCI.:ISlon because Congress has not spelled out the proper relationship between the bankruptcy laws and the labor laws," the Council continued. "Given an opening. the Court'S conservative majority fashioned a legal rule that is best for busllless and worst for workers," it said. The high Court's February 22 rullllg carne in two parts, the first part unanimous and the second spin ;'j-4. In the unanimous deCision, the Court ruled that a bankruptcy COUrt may free a company from Its union contracts with Out requITIng pro<strong>of</strong> that the COntr3CtS thre3ten the comp3ny's survival. The company must Simply show that the contracts arc a financial "burden." In the closely spilt rullllg. the Coun said a company m3Y abrogate a coll ccllve bargaimng agreement as soon as It files for bankruptcy while awaltlllg the deci' sion <strong>of</strong> a bankruptcy Judge . The hank· ruptcy court could later restore the contract by rejecting the bankruptcy petition. The Council noted that the COUrt rnaiority in the 5-4 ruling h3d ignored lhe reasoning <strong>of</strong> a minority dissent written by Associate lustlee Wilham I. Brennan, J" Brcn n"" Wlute that the malorlty "Ius completely Ignored Important poliCies that underlie the National whor Rela · tlons ACt " <strong>of</strong> 1935 In pcrn1lttlng a com· pany " Unilaterally to alter ;I collective bargaining agreement " Pernllttlng thiS, s[lId Brennan, l!o a "threat to bbor peace." He added 1113t the mllng will mean that " resolution <strong>of</strong> the parlles' disputes will indeed be left to the relative slfcngth <strong>of</strong> the comendlll):: forces. " A~ I'xamplcs, Hrennan notes that the union workers at Continental Airlines and Wilson Foods had gone on strike after the compames last year tore up their contracts. The effect <strong>of</strong> the rullllg on the Conti· nental case was uncle:I!. Airlines 3re covered by the Railway Labor Act rather than the NLRA. The Court noted that Its ruling pertained to contracts under the N LRA, not the Railway Labor Act, where the bonkmptcy l:iw is specially restricted from being used to get OUI <strong>of</strong> union contracts. AFL-CIO Spl.: .... lal Ce wa.,> movlllg through the coun s, Contlllental Alrltnes last September used the bank· ruptcy petition deVIce 10 cancel colleclive ba rg:lllllllg agreements with pilots, flJght 3t!endants and machinists even though the company wasn't short <strong>of</strong> cash or :lbout 10 collapse. The :lidines' unions arc sull on Strike and the AFL-CIO has c311ed a national boycol! 10 support them. AFL-CIO attorney Gold noted that followlllg the enactment <strong>of</strong> b:mkruptcy law amendments in 1978, making it easier for both companies and individuals to declare -bankmptey, there has been a trend by employers to usc bankruptcy to break or weaken ItS unIOns. Gold s;ud the Supreme Court ruling, unless reversed by Congress, will " Lll crease the level <strong>of</strong> distress between employers and unIOns, lllercase the number uf lalNI Jll>pl,Jlt;~, "ud ClcalC greater lli' stabilIty in coll ective bargallling." Regardlllg the court 'S standard that companies seeking to void thelT union contracts through bankruptcy need only show that the contracts 3fe a "burden," Cold said "collective bargaming agree· ments arc always, If they're worth the paper they're wnttcn Oil, an economic burden on employers-cverybody would Itkc 10 pay the mmlmum wage or below." Edllor'. NOle : As this issue <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Journal</strong> was going to press late in March the U.S. House <strong>of</strong> Representatives passed legis· lation 10 save bankruptcy COl/rlS lrom a March 30 shutdown while saleguarding labor oonllacts from lirms that want them scrapped during bankruptcy proceedings. Similar legislation hali been passed by the Senate. The legislation. which is elfpected to go to joint Conference Committee shorlly to Iron out any dil/erences botween the House and Senate versions. is aimed at rescuing a bankruptcy system that the Supreme Court declared unconstitutional. Eventual passage <strong>of</strong> such leg· Islliliun is a top priority for organized labor. Nelft month's <strong>Journal</strong> will carry more de· ta!!s on this importa nt legislation as it moves toward enactment Into law. • 12 \ <strong>IBEW</strong> JOURNAL I APRIL <strong>1984</strong>
.. ANNUAL STATEMENT OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS' BENEFIT ASSOCIATION In compliance ""'111 the requirements or the Fraternal Act 01 vanous stales, we afe publlshmg below Inlormallon conlalned In the annual slatemeni 01 the Electnai Wor1
- Page 1 and 2: TN" IL-.f ...... -'-r-~""_""-~ .t&J
- Page 3 and 4: . . . . OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE
- Page 5 and 6: ... During the AFL-CIO Executive Co
- Page 7 and 8: 4 . . Pictured here are the members
- Page 9 and 10: . - . I 1 Walwr )Iondalc ha~
- Page 11 and 12: International Representative John W
- Page 13: . . Get more mileage for your money
- Page 17 and 18: department of Research and Educatio
- Page 19 and 20: DANGERS In BUYING NON-PRESCRIPTION
- Page 21 and 22: t( 01 Enruv,lIe on Decembel 16 As I
- Page 23 and 24: kno ... n O'~ I .he YUI$, and hopdu
- Page 25 and 26: .hat will help. Why not tall .hc )A
- Page 27 and 28: , Ih~ college cdueilion of 1""0 0/
- Page 29 and 30: .: Stewards Seminar Held; Board Scr
- Page 31 and 32: Blood Drive Trophy ,.....,..---. Bu
- Page 33 and 34: Many ot ou. locil lhothe., h~~c bee
- Page 35 and 36: Fruit Baskets Given to Retirees L.
- Page 37 and 38: y- enem,es h~ven ' t rcally dC5uoye
- Page 39 and 40: n (\ Meeting \ Graduates Honored Pi
- Page 41 and 42: Honorees .....--- -Sho WII I I the
- Page 43 and 44: ' bers with any new additions to th
- Page 45 and 46: ~ ~n d 8. L~st ye~l, the inItIal sh
- Page 47 and 48: appreciated VIce PresIdent HightllW
- Page 49 and 50: Charter Members La.it Rori~oD . Idr
- Page 51 and 52: ~ Costumes Some of Ihe IK.I', "It d
- Page 53 and 54: Picnic Fun Socializing wtlh Prizes
- Page 55 and 56: Dinner-Dance Andy and 8,,10 Zitlins
- Page 57 and 58: hard n work 10 destroy us We m ust
- Page 59 and 60: Shown illlhi, piCIUf~ a", rur, It I
- Page 61 and 62: ·nd Add·Ben Lc~ sc ht / I al,o Fl
- Page 63 and 64: January Meeting Features Distinguis
- Page 65 and 66:
II\IIVIEIVIDRII=IM Prayer (or OUT D
- Page 67 and 68:
REFLE T . . I ' - Brother Bill r ne