20.12.2013 Views

Niche Markets for Economic Revitalisation of Satoyama Forest ...

Niche Markets for Economic Revitalisation of Satoyama Forest ...

Niche Markets for Economic Revitalisation of Satoyama Forest ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.3 Challenges Relating to Carbon <strong>Markets</strong><br />

Potential Supply <strong>of</strong> <strong>Forest</strong>ry Projects:<br />

According to the IPCC (2007) sequestration potential in<br />

Japan is estimated in the range <strong>of</strong> 35–70 MtCO2/yr and<br />

planted <strong>for</strong>ests account <strong>for</strong> more than 60 per cent <strong>of</strong> the<br />

carbon sequestration. While assessments cited in the IPCC<br />

report show that there is little potential <strong>for</strong> af<strong>for</strong>estation and<br />

re<strong>for</strong>estation in Japan, <strong>for</strong>est management and practices <strong>for</strong><br />

planted <strong>for</strong>ests including thinning and regeneration have<br />

been identified as necessary to maintain carbon sequestration<br />

and to curb saturation. There is, there<strong>for</strong>e a potential supply<br />

<strong>of</strong> ongoing carbon sequestration management projects<br />

compatible with satoyama conservation goals.<br />

Emerging Demand <strong>for</strong> <strong>Forest</strong>ry Projects:<br />

Unlike other market oriented solutions discussed in this<br />

brief, carbon finance opportunities which depend primarily<br />

on government policy and demand <strong>for</strong> sequestration<br />

management projects in <strong>for</strong>estry will be driven primarily<br />

by regulatory developments in Japan. At present there is no<br />

mandatory national scheme that would prompt a demand<br />

<strong>for</strong> such projects, although there is a voluntary scheme.<br />

Future carbon markets in Japan, if they are to arise, would<br />

most likely flow from Japan’s engagement with the Kyoto<br />

Protocol and future agreements under the United Nations<br />

Framework Convention on Climate Change. 34<br />

Under the current Kyoto Protocol Japan is a major purchaser<br />

<strong>of</strong> carbon emissions rights from overseas project under<br />

the United Nations’ CDM. The demand <strong>for</strong> <strong>of</strong>fset projects,<br />

whether domestic or otherwise will likely remain high in<br />

Japan due to the country’s high level <strong>of</strong> energy efficiency and<br />

high marginal abatement costs in its industrial sector relative<br />

to other Kyoto signatories with reduction commitments.<br />

The World Bank estimated at the end <strong>of</strong> 2006 that Japan<br />

possessed 84 megatons <strong>of</strong> demand <strong>for</strong> Kyoto Mechanism<br />

credits in addition to the 266 megatons it had already<br />

purchased at that point (World Bank, 2007).<br />

While it is not clear what international cooperation regime<br />

will emerge after the Kyoto Protocol expires in 2012, carbon<br />

markets are likely to play a role. The G8 at Heiligendamm<br />

in 2007 agreed to aim to half CO 2<br />

emissions by 2050. The<br />

International Emissions Trading Association’s recent Market<br />

Sentiment Survey indicate that more than 90 per cent <strong>of</strong><br />

respondents believe that the GHG Market is an established<br />

instrument that will continue post 2012. In addition, more<br />

than 65 per cent <strong>of</strong> those surveyed anticipated that a global<br />

market will be established in the next ten years. Still, how<br />

and whether these trends will result in a domestic <strong>of</strong>fset<br />

market in Japan <strong>for</strong> <strong>for</strong>estry projects is an open question.<br />

2.4 Technical Challenges <strong>of</strong> <strong>Forest</strong>ry Projects<br />

• Carbon Measurement:<br />

Estimating carbon emissions to a uni<strong>for</strong>m standard<br />

from <strong>for</strong>est preservation activities is more difficult than<br />

<strong>for</strong> energy–related projects because the carbon content<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>ests varies significantly depending on the density,<br />

age and type <strong>of</strong> trees, and the soils. Detection <strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>est<br />

degradation, as opposed to actual de<strong>for</strong>estation, is<br />

particularly challenging.<br />

• Natural/Accidental De<strong>for</strong>estation:<br />

<strong>Forest</strong>s can be reduced through natural or accidental<br />

causes, such as fires or disease, causing unplanned<br />

fluctuations in emissions, and markets would need to<br />

allow <strong>for</strong> this in some way. The Chicago Climate Exchange<br />

dealt with this <strong>for</strong> their <strong>Forest</strong>ry Carbon Emissions<br />

Offsets by creating a carbon reserve pool <strong>of</strong> 20 per cent<br />

<strong>of</strong> emissions to allow <strong>for</strong> catastrophic loss, released at<br />

the end <strong>of</strong> the programme. The way in which this issue<br />

is handled will affect credibility and could influence the<br />

price at which units are traded.<br />

• Ensuring Climate Benefits:<br />

A key challenge is to ensure that emissions reductions<br />

are additional. The nature <strong>of</strong> the drivers <strong>of</strong> de<strong>for</strong>estation<br />

implies a substantial risk that, if small areas are<br />

protected, leakage to other areas could take place and<br />

overall emissions would not be reduced, although this<br />

is certainly a more acute problem with international<br />

emissions trading and <strong>of</strong>fset projects in countries where<br />

de<strong>for</strong>estation is a major problem, unlike Japan.<br />

• Agreeing on an Equitable Basis <strong>for</strong> Participation and<br />

Incentives:<br />

Determining the baseline <strong>of</strong> emissions from de<strong>for</strong>estation<br />

beyond which tradable credits would be earned can<br />

be challenging, although this is less the case with a<br />

national programme than an international one. Getting<br />

the level right may involve assessment <strong>of</strong> the historical<br />

trend and is a technical challenge given the variability in<br />

de<strong>for</strong>estation rates year by year. A particular challenge,<br />

when setting baselines, is how to treat activities that<br />

have already enhanced carbon sinks. Focusing only on<br />

current activity alone would mean the management<br />

entities currently neglecting satoyama the most could<br />

benefit the most.<br />

Since carbon finance opportunities depend primarily on<br />

government policy the primary barriers to a domestic<br />

emission trading in Japan at this point are political. At<br />

present, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Environment and Ministry <strong>of</strong> Economy,<br />

Trade and Industries (METI) are divided over the development<br />

<strong>of</strong> an emissions trading scheme in the Kyoto compliance<br />

period. Nevertheless there are technical challenges 35 that are<br />

specific to <strong>for</strong>estry and sinks in emissions trading that are<br />

worth mentioning.<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!