20.12.2013 Views

Niche Markets for Economic Revitalisation of Satoyama Forest ...

Niche Markets for Economic Revitalisation of Satoyama Forest ...

Niche Markets for Economic Revitalisation of Satoyama Forest ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

INTRODUCTION<br />

This section briefly introduces the notion <strong>of</strong> satoyama and<br />

proposes a working definition <strong>of</strong> the term. A brief pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>for</strong>est resources in Ishikawa Prefecture and a highlight <strong>of</strong> the<br />

key issues are also introduced and discussed.<br />

What is <strong>Satoyama</strong>?<br />

To many Japanese, the term satoyama is associated with<br />

images <strong>of</strong> idyllic rural woodlands. At the same time, this<br />

environment has traditionally provided food, fuel, fertilisers<br />

and other material goods to Japanese communities, as well as<br />

regulating local climates and ecosystems, fostering cultural<br />

ties, and supporting local production systems and ecological<br />

cycles. However, the overall functioning <strong>of</strong> satoyama has<br />

been in steady decline in recent years due to a decline in its<br />

economic application and subsequent neglect over the last<br />

half a century. 1<br />

Unlike many <strong>for</strong>estry management problems globally that<br />

are associated with de<strong>for</strong>estation, the challenges facing<br />

satoyama stem from the absence <strong>of</strong> human intervention.<br />

At one time Japanese <strong>for</strong>ests <strong>of</strong> this kind were an important<br />

resource <strong>for</strong> rural society, particularly as a source <strong>of</strong> charcoal<br />

fuel and natural fertiliser, and were, thus, intensively<br />

managed. However, satoyama, since the latter half <strong>of</strong> the<br />

twentieth century, has increasingly been neglected or<br />

abandoned outright. Consequently, some <strong>of</strong> the additional<br />

ecosystem services provided by satoyama, including<br />

soil retention, watershed conservation, carbon fixation,<br />

biodiversity, buffer zones, and the spiritual and aesthetic<br />

benefits to community have been in decline as well.<br />

Managed <strong>for</strong>est lands like satoyama are referred to generally<br />

in English as “coppice woodlands” (Takeuchi et al., 2001).<br />

In the UK, as in Japan, the practice <strong>of</strong> coppicing trees has<br />

created a unique ecosystem where there is less dead<br />

wood, and a more open canopy that permits greater solar<br />

radiation and <strong>of</strong>ten higher plant and animal diversity than in<br />

unmanaged <strong>for</strong>ests. As in Japan, managed woodlands in the<br />

UK are no longer commercially viable. Little or no cutting has<br />

taken place in the last fifty years, and there is a shortage <strong>of</strong><br />

skilled labour and volunteer–based management does not<br />

present itself as a viable long–term solution. Appropriate<br />

responses to the decline <strong>of</strong> satoyama are, thus, closely<br />

associated with identifying economic incentives upon<br />

which to reinstitute the types <strong>of</strong> management practices<br />

that accompanied previous economic exploitation <strong>of</strong> these<br />

<strong>for</strong>ests prior to the urbanisation trends <strong>of</strong> the postwar<br />

period and the concomitant uptake <strong>of</strong> fossil fuels as the<br />

primary energy resource in Japanese society. While there<br />

are many possibilities in this regard 2 , this paper investigates<br />

three niche markets which have the prospect <strong>of</strong> economic<br />

utilisation <strong>of</strong> and revitalisation <strong>of</strong> satoyama resources<br />

through enhanced market–based management. In general,<br />

the niche markets include innovative wood–based products<br />

from <strong>for</strong>est thinnings, new bio–energy products, and trade<br />

in carbon markets. These niche products which have<br />

cross–sector utilisation are highlighted and discussed both<br />

as local initiatives and within the context <strong>of</strong> opportunities<br />

<strong>of</strong>fered by larger societal trends that have the potential to<br />

arrest and eventually reverse the deterioration <strong>of</strong> satoyama<br />

economy. While this paper does not represent a specific<br />

action plan <strong>for</strong> satoyama revitalisation in any given region<br />

in Japan, it specifically seeks to address the situation in<br />

Ishikawa Prefecture through a better understanding <strong>of</strong> the<br />

local, prefectural, and national policies, satoyama resources<br />

management practices and related local, and national<br />

economic activities.<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> the term satoyama has become widespread relatively<br />

recently. 3 The 5 th edition <strong>of</strong> “Kojien” (monolingual Japanese<br />

dictionary) describes satoyama as “mountain or <strong>for</strong>est areas<br />

that are close to human habitation and tied to people’s lives”. 4<br />

There is also a viewpoint that the designation “satochi” can<br />

be applied when it refers to the overall traditional agricultural<br />

village landscape consisting <strong>of</strong> farmland and villages besides<br />

the narrowly defined satoyama—consisting mostly <strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>ests<br />

(Takeuchi et al, 2001). The Ministry <strong>of</strong> the Environment <strong>of</strong><br />

Japan defines “satochi–satoyama” as “conceptual geographic<br />

regions located between urban and primitive natural areas<br />

where the environment has been <strong>for</strong>med through the ef<strong>for</strong>ts<br />

<strong>of</strong> diverse human activity, and is comprised <strong>of</strong> secondary<br />

<strong>for</strong>ests surrounding villages intermixed with farmland,<br />

reservoirs, and grasslands, among other features” (Nature<br />

Conservation Bureau, Ministry <strong>of</strong> the Environment, 2001a).<br />

In addition, the “Ordinance <strong>for</strong> Protecting and Fostering the<br />

Environment in Hometown Ishikawa Prefecture (Hometown<br />

Environment Ordinance)” enacted in March, 2004 in<br />

Ishikawa Prefecture highlighted in this paper, defines<br />

“<strong>for</strong>ests, farmland, and wetlands among other features<br />

<strong>for</strong>med or maintained through connection with people” as<br />

“satoyama” (Article 132). 5 Although there are differences in<br />

the way satoyama is defined, the common idea is that <strong>of</strong> “a<br />

secondary natural environment <strong>for</strong>med through interaction<br />

with people”. This point is important as it fundamentally<br />

relates back to the present day issue <strong>of</strong> the deterioration <strong>of</strong><br />

satoyama due to a reduction in human involvement.<br />

These definitions above are examples <strong>of</strong> the many<br />

terminologies <strong>of</strong> satoyama that exist in Japan today. The<br />

definitions are usually influenced by the backgrounds and<br />

interests <strong>of</strong> the scholars and stakeholders who are defining<br />

satoyama, and the context within which the definition<br />

is placed. There<strong>for</strong>e, as a concept, satoyama could be<br />

narrow or broad, specific or nebulous. For example, without<br />

contradicting the "Kojien" definition <strong>of</strong> satoyama quoted<br />

above, Yoshimura, Noda, Tanaka and Hosoda (2005) specify<br />

that it refers to “secondary <strong>for</strong>ests that are within about<br />

400m <strong>of</strong> the paddy field . . . [and] close to the village and<br />

traditionally used <strong>for</strong> agricultural purpose, collection <strong>for</strong><br />

charcoal wood and edible herbs.” On the other hand, the<br />

<strong>for</strong>ests which are located farther from the community and<br />

not subject to human intervention and management but<br />

suitable <strong>for</strong> <strong>for</strong>estry in a more traditional or general sense<br />

can be defined as okuyama. There<strong>for</strong>e, satoyama is broader<br />

than it is frequently conceived or defined. It is a concept that<br />

is inclusive or holistic, as the proposed working definition<br />

below attempts to convey.<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!