The Syntax of Givenness Ivona Kucerová
The Syntax of Givenness Ivona Kucerová The Syntax of Givenness Ivona Kucerová
Lasnik, Howard. 1999. Chains of arguments. In Working Minimalism, ed. David Epstein and Norbert Hornstein. Cambridge: MIT Press. Lasnik, Howard, and Mamoru Saito. 1992. Move α. Conditions on its application and output. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Lavine, James, and Robert Freidin. 2002. The subject of defective T(ense) in Slavic. Journal of Slavic linguistics 10:251–287. Lebeaux, David. 1988. Language acquisition and the form of grammar. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Lebeaux, David. 1998. Where does binding theory apply? Technical report, NEC. Magri, Giorgio. 2007. A theory of individual level predicates based on blind scalar implicatures [MIT ms.]. Mahajan, Anoop Kumar. 1990. The A/A-bar distinction and movement theory. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT. Mathesius, Vilém. [1929] 1983. Functional linguistics. In Praguiana: Some basic and wellknown aspects of the Prague Linguistics School, ed. J. Vachek, 121–142. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Mathesius, Vilém. 1931. K dynamické linii české věty [To the dynamic line of a Czech sentence]. Časopis pro moderní filologii 17:71ff. Mathesius, Vilém. 1937. Mluvní takt a některé problémy příbuzné [Prosodic tact and some related problems]. Slovo a slovesnost 3:193–199. Mathesius, Vilém. 1939. O tak zvaném aktuálním členění věty [On the so called topic/comment articulation of the sentence]. Slovo a slovesnost 5:171–174. Meyer, Roland. 2003. On multiple wh-fronting and wh-clustering in Czech. In Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics XII: The Amherst meeting, ed. W. Browne, E. Kim, and B. Partee, 393–412. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications. Meyer, Roland. 2004. Syntax der Ergänzungsfrage. Empirische Untersuchungen am Russischen, Polnischen und Tschechischen [syntax of wh-questions. Empirical studies in russian, polish and czech]. München: Verlag Otto Sagner. Miyagawa, Shigeru. 1997. Against optional scrambling. Linguistic Inquiry 28:1–25. Neeleman, Ad. 1994. Scrambling as a D-structure phenomenon. In Studies on scrambling, ed. Norbert Corver and Henk van Riemsdjijk, 387–429. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Neeleman, Ad, and Hans van de Koot. 2006. The nature of discourse templates. [UCL ms.]. 148
Neeleman, Ad, and Tanya Reinhart. 1998. Scrambling and the PF interface. In The projection of arguments, ed. M. Butt and W. Geuder, 309–353. CSLI. Nevins, Andrew, and Pranav Anand. 2003. Some AGREEment matters. In Proceedings of WCCFL 22, ed. G. Garding and M. Tsujimura, 370–383. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla Press. Nissenbaum, Jon. 1998. Movement and derived predicates: Evidence from Parasitic Gaps. In The interpretive tract, ed. Uli Sauerland and Orin Percus, 247–295. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL. Nissenbaum, Jonathan W. 2000. Investigations of covert phrase movement. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT. Novák, Pavel. 1959. O prostředcích aktuálního členění [On the means of topic-focus articulation]. AUC Philologica 1:9–15. Ogihara, Toshiyuki. 1996. Tense, Attitudes, and Scope. Springer. Palková, Zdena. 1994. Fonetika a fonologie češtiny [Phonetics and phonology of Czech]. Praha: Karolinum. Partee, Barbara H., and Mats Rooth. 1983. Generalized conjunction and type ambiquity. In Meaning, use and the interpretation of language, ed. Rainer Bäurle, Christoph Schwarze, and Arnim von Stechow, 361–393. Walter de Gruyter & Co. Percus, Orin. 2006. Anti-presuppositions. In Theoretical and empirical studies of reference and anaphora: Toward the establishment of generative grammar as an empirical science, ed. A. Ueyamada, 52–73. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. Pesetsky, David. 1982. Paths and categories. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT. Pesetsky, David, and Esther Torrego. 2006. Probes, goals and syntactic categories. In Proceedings of the Seventh Tokyo conference on psycholinguistics, ed. Yukio Otsu, 25– 60. Tokyo: Hituzi Svobo Publishing Company. Petr, Jan, Miloš Dokulil, Karel Horálek, Jiřina Hůrková, and Miloslava Knappová, ed. 1986. Mluvnice češtiny [Grammar of Czech]. Praha: Academia. Petřík, Stanislav. 1938. O hudební stránce stědočeské věty [About musical properties of a Central Bohemian sentence]. Praha: Filosofická fakulta University Karlovy. Postal, Paul. 1966. On so-called “pronouns” in English. In Report on the Seventeenth Annual Round Table Meeting on Linguistics and Language Studies, 177–206. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. Pylkkänen, Liina. 2002. Introducing arguments. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA. Reinhart, Tanya. 1995. Focus – the PF interface [University of Utrecht, ms.]. 149
- Page 97 and 98: ‘Martin was loved again.’ The c
- Page 99 and 100: Furthermore, I assume that if there
- Page 101 and 102: lexical head. In a way, we want the
- Page 103 and 104: (54) a. VP Petr VP V t Petr b. vP P
- Page 105 and 106: c. TP VP book give to-Peter t book
- Page 107 and 108: In the same way that there can be t
- Page 109 and 110: (70) st terminating point object e,
- Page 111 and 112: c. G-operator and local G-movement:
- Page 113 and 114: Mary managed chair G to-burn d. G-o
- Page 115 and 116: well. Recall that there are two rel
- Page 117 and 118: There is simply no way the G-operat
- Page 119 and 120: (97) a. And what will he read and t
- Page 121 and 122: In this case, the given part is ‘
- Page 123 and 124: To sum up, we now have in place a f
- Page 125 and 126: Generic indefinites behave slightly
- Page 127 and 128: . #Porsche má kamarád mojí ženy
- Page 129 and 130: The position of the sentential stre
- Page 131 and 132: is whether English givenness is rea
- Page 133 and 134: Appendix A G-movement is A-movement
- Page 135 and 136: . Svoji kočku má ráda Marie. her
- Page 137 and 138: with movement of a pronoun over a c
- Page 139 and 140: Petr’s friends.Acc saw Marie.Nom
- Page 141 and 142: A.5 Summary To conclude, we have se
- Page 143 and 144: Biskup, Petr. In preparation. The p
- Page 145 and 146: Dotlačil, Jakub. 2004. The syntax
- Page 147: Junghanns, Uwe. 1999. Generative Be
- Page 151 and 152: Selkirk, Elizabeth O. 1995. Sentenc
- Page 153: Zikánová, Šárka. 2006. Slovosle
Lasnik, Howard. 1999. Chains <strong>of</strong> arguments. In Working Minimalism, ed. David Epstein<br />
and Norbert Hornstein. Cambridge: MIT Press.<br />
Lasnik, Howard, and Mamoru Saito. 1992. Move α. Conditions on its application and<br />
output. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.<br />
Lavine, James, and Robert Freidin. 2002. <strong>The</strong> subject <strong>of</strong> defective T(ense) in Slavic. Journal<br />
<strong>of</strong> Slavic linguistics 10:251–287.<br />
Lebeaux, David. 1988. Language acquisition and the form <strong>of</strong> grammar. Doctoral Dissertation,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts at Amherst.<br />
Lebeaux, David. 1998. Where does binding theory apply? Technical report, NEC.<br />
Magri, Giorgio. 2007. A theory <strong>of</strong> individual level predicates based on blind scalar implicatures<br />
[MIT ms.].<br />
Mahajan, Anoop Kumar. 1990. <strong>The</strong> A/A-bar distinction and movement theory. Doctoral<br />
Dissertation, MIT.<br />
Mathesius, Vilém. [1929] 1983. Functional linguistics. In Praguiana: Some basic and wellknown<br />
aspects <strong>of</strong> the Prague Linguistics School, ed. J. Vachek, 121–142. Amsterdam:<br />
John Benjamins.<br />
Mathesius, Vilém. 1931. K dynamické linii české věty [To the dynamic line <strong>of</strong> a Czech<br />
sentence]. Časopis pro moderní filologii 17:71ff.<br />
Mathesius, Vilém. 1937. Mluvní takt a některé problémy příbuzné [Prosodic tact and some<br />
related problems]. Slovo a slovesnost 3:193–199.<br />
Mathesius, Vilém. 1939. O tak zvaném aktuálním členění věty [On the so called<br />
topic/comment articulation <strong>of</strong> the sentence]. Slovo a slovesnost 5:171–174.<br />
Meyer, Roland. 2003. On multiple wh-fronting and wh-clustering in Czech. In Formal<br />
approaches to Slavic linguistics XII: <strong>The</strong> Amherst meeting, ed. W. Browne, E. Kim, and<br />
B. Partee, 393–412. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.<br />
Meyer, Roland. 2004. <strong>Syntax</strong> der Ergänzungsfrage. Empirische Untersuchungen am Russischen,<br />
Polnischen und Tschechischen [syntax <strong>of</strong> wh-questions. Empirical studies in<br />
russian, polish and czech]. München: Verlag Otto Sagner.<br />
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 1997. Against optional scrambling. Linguistic Inquiry 28:1–25.<br />
Neeleman, Ad. 1994. Scrambling as a D-structure phenomenon. In Studies on scrambling,<br />
ed. Norbert Corver and Henk van Riemsdjijk, 387–429. Berlin, New York: Mouton de<br />
Gruyter.<br />
Neeleman, Ad, and Hans van de Koot. 2006. <strong>The</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> discourse templates. [UCL<br />
ms.].<br />
148
Change language