20.12.2013 Views

The Syntax of Givenness Ivona Kucerová

The Syntax of Givenness Ivona Kucerová

The Syntax of Givenness Ivona Kucerová

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(70) st<br />

terminating point<br />

object<br />

e,st<br />

λ<br />

st<br />

subject<br />

G . . .<br />

Thus if there is only one G-operator per propositional domain (which seems to be correct<br />

considering the nature <strong>of</strong> the G-operator, though this is hard to test), unless the object<br />

moves before the subject is merged the object could not be interpreted as presupposed. I<br />

therefore conclude that we need an independent requirement which prefers derivations with<br />

very local movement to derivations with a non-local G-movement.<br />

Another issue that has remained unanswered so far is when exactly the Maximize presupposition<br />

evaluation takes place. I assume that the evaluation may happen at the end <strong>of</strong><br />

a phase. This allows limitation <strong>of</strong> the global comparison only to structures which can be<br />

derived within a phase from the same numeration. I assume this is possible under the assumption<br />

that phases correspond to propositions. But nothing in our system depends on this<br />

choice. If it turns out that presuppositions are computed only at the level <strong>of</strong> the utterance,<br />

the system can be straightforwardly adjusted to that.<br />

4.3 <strong>The</strong> evaluation component<br />

In the previous section we have concentrated on defining a given operator and on introducing<br />

such an operator within the logical form. In this section, I will set up a formal<br />

evaluation component for the purposes <strong>of</strong> Maximize presupposition. This step will complete<br />

the modification <strong>of</strong> the originally purely syntactic system. In the rest <strong>of</strong> this section I<br />

will examine whether the modified system can account for the data from chapters 2 and 3<br />

that we originally covered by G-movement.<br />

To see exactly how the evaluation component works we need not only to define the reference<br />

set but also to have a clear metrics that we can use to compare different derivations.<br />

We already have a definition <strong>of</strong> a reference set. <strong>The</strong> definition is repeated below.<br />

(71) Reference set for Maximize Presupposition evaluation<br />

For purposes <strong>of</strong> Maximize Presupposition, the reference set, toward which Maximize<br />

presupposition is evaluated, consists <strong>of</strong> all derivations<br />

a. that are based on the same numeration and free insertion <strong>of</strong> a G-operator, and<br />

b. that make the same assertion.<br />

In order to have a clear metrics I will define two constraints with respect to which each<br />

candidate within a reference set will be evaluated. 16 First, we need to guarantee that all<br />

16 <strong>The</strong> reader should not be misled by the terminology. <strong>The</strong> system developed here is not an optimality<br />

109

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!