23.11.2013 Views

PIANC E-Magazine - PIANC AIPCN welcome

PIANC E-Magazine - PIANC AIPCN welcome

PIANC E-Magazine - PIANC AIPCN welcome

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

different values were tested (0.5, 0.55, 0.6, 0.65<br />

and 0.7) to cover the most typical range of values.<br />

For each m and armour unit (double-layer cube<br />

armour, double-layer Cubipod armour and single<br />

layer Cubipod armour), the best fitting probability<br />

density function was obtained (using EasyFit 4.3).<br />

In most cases Gumbell’s distribution accurately<br />

represented the phenomenon (being a distribution<br />

widely used for the extremal characterisation).<br />

The table below (Figure 8) shows the probability<br />

for the different m and elements to be over zero.<br />

• g ƒ<br />

is the overtopping roughness factor, which<br />

depends on the armour unit. Smolka (2008) obtained<br />

these factors in the overtopping formulation.<br />

This factor considers the roughness and<br />

permeability of the structure and depends on<br />

the armour unit among other factors. This variable<br />

is introduced in RU, directly affecting the<br />

wave height of the run-up, common in overtopping<br />

and run-up models: g ƒ<br />

RU.<br />

L 01<br />

• BL is the Ba variable. BL represents the berm<br />

width and time period and it affects the water<br />

flow that arrives at the crown wall through the<br />

armour layer.<br />

€<br />

Figure 8. Probability that S1 is the most unfavourable case<br />

Since in at least 70 % of the cases the estimator<br />

is on the security side, it is reasonable to obtain<br />

the formulae that represent these forces.<br />

3.2. Significant Variables<br />

The main variables that control the horizontal and<br />

up-lift force phenomena are shown in figure 9.<br />

These variables were obtained from the existing<br />

€<br />

formulae.<br />

• RU is the Ru/Rc variable. RU indicates whether<br />

overtopping exists or not and is related to € the<br />

value of the run-up. RU also represents the<br />

higher level of water that reaches the crown<br />

wall.<br />

• RA is the (Rc-Ac)/hf variable. RA represents the<br />

crown wall zone which is not protected by the<br />

berm versus the protected one. This variable<br />

only depends on the cross-section geometry.<br />

• WC is the Wc/hf variable. WC represents the<br />

distance between the foundations of the crown<br />

wall and the mean sea level. This variable depends<br />

only on the cross-section geometry.<br />

The forces were made dimensionless as shown:<br />

• Fh, dimensionless horizontal force:<br />

Fh<br />

ρ ⋅ g⋅ hf 2 ⋅ 0.5<br />

• Fv(Fh), dimensionless up-lift force:<br />

Fv (Fh)<br />

ρ ⋅ g⋅ hf ⋅ Be ⋅ 0.5 , with Be being the base<br />

width of the crown wall.<br />

The forces were calculated considering that the<br />

pressure at each point of the crown wall takes the<br />

value from the nearest pressure sensor. This calculation<br />

does not assume any specific pressure<br />

distribution, since there are as many rectangular<br />

distributions as pressure sensors.<br />

3.3.New Formulae<br />

A linear dependence of some of the variables was<br />

observed, so the initial linear formula for Fh was:<br />

<strong>PIANC</strong> E-<strong>Magazine</strong> n° 144, November/novembre 2011<br />

36

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!