22.11.2013 Views

DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES,

DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES,

DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES,

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

21<br />

to fishermen, the only one in existence there being at Obatham, miles up the Mira<br />

miohi River.<br />

There are employed in the fisheries on the coasts above named 2,265 boats,<br />

carrying 5,147 men, to whom the extension of the storm signal system would be of<br />

the greatest value. At Souris, P. E. I., the want of storm warnings is also much<br />

felt; there are frequently there for shelter as many as one hundred vessels, and<br />

sometimes double that number; there are also in this neighborhood 253 boats, carrying<br />

674 men.<br />

Ingonish, C. B., and Canso, in Guysboro', N. S., are also extensive boat harbors'<br />

where storm signals would be most useful.<br />

I would therefore propose that storm signal masts should be erected at the following<br />

places :—(l.) Point Escuminac; (2.) Tracadie; (3.) Shippegan; (4.) Caraquet;<br />

(5.) Souris; (6.) Irgonish; ('7.) Canso.<br />

Telegraphic communication is now established with all these places and the<br />

work can, I believe, be performed efficiently.<br />

The estimate of cost is, construction account—.7 masts and gear at $100, $700.<br />

The maintenance account will be nine months' salary, at $5 per month to agent,<br />

$45, and $5 for oil and expenses,or for the seven stations at $50 each a charge of $350<br />

per annum additional to the meteorological service vote. As this is the only means<br />

of benefitting the fishermen from the expenditure on the meteorological service, I<br />

would respectfully urge it on your favorable consideration.<br />

ON THE LICENSING OR MARKING <strong>OF</strong> CANADIAN FISHING VESSELS.<br />

I beg to call your attention to the difficulty which our pol!ce vessels find in<br />

distinguishing at any little distance, the difference between Canadian and United<br />

States fishing vessels. In my report for 1887 I drew particular attention to this<br />

point and suggested that the difficulty might be overcome either by licensing or<br />

otherwise controlling our fishing vessels, and requiring them to carry when on a<br />

fishing voyage, some distinguishing mark which could be easily made out at a distance.<br />

This would add considerably to the efficiency of the patrol of our waters and<br />

the cost to the fishermen of putting, say, a dbgonal cross of brown tanned cotton on<br />

both sides of his mainsail would be quite trivial. The lack of some distinguishing<br />

mark of this kind, gives rise frequently to unfounded rumors of fishing within the<br />

limits by foreign vessels, whion, when investigated, prove to be Canadian.<br />

I have the honor to be, Sir,<br />

Your obedient servant,<br />

ANDREW R. GORDON, Lieut., RJ%T.,<br />

Commanding Fisheries Protection Service.<br />

<strong>FISHERIES</strong> PROTECTION SCHOONER "VIGILANT."<br />

Lieut. GORDON, RN.,<br />

Commanding Fisheries Protection Service<br />

SIR,—I beg leave to tender a synopsis of the work done during the past season<br />

by the Fisheries Protection schooner "Vigilant," under my command.<br />

By instructions received from the Department of Fisheries, I took command of<br />

the "Vigilant" on I 5th May, and proceeded at once to refit and prepare for sea.<br />

1st June sailed for I armouth, N.S., and thence followed the fleet of United<br />

States' mackerel seiners eastward to Ohedabucto Bay and round Cape Breton to<br />

Prince Edward Island, where7 from 1st June tQ 2th July, we cruised between Mal.<br />

pèque and Souris,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!