22.11.2013 Views

crimes committed by totalitarian regimes - Ministrstvo za pravosodje

crimes committed by totalitarian regimes - Ministrstvo za pravosodje

crimes committed by totalitarian regimes - Ministrstvo za pravosodje

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Crimes <strong>committed</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>totalitarian</strong> <strong>regimes</strong><br />

others particularly vulnerable to suffering human rights abuses. 37 At a minimum, the terms of reference<br />

must: allow it to investigate “all persons alleged to have been responsible for violations of human<br />

rights and/or humanitarian law, whether they ordered them or actually <strong>committed</strong> them /and facilitated<br />

them/, acting as perpetrators or accomplices, and whether they are public officials or members of quasigovernmental<br />

or private armed groups with any kind of link to the State, or of non-governmental armed<br />

movements”; priority should be given to serious <strong>crimes</strong> under international law especially those against<br />

vulnerable groups; enable it to call on the assistance of law enforcement authorities to obtain oral<br />

and documentary evidence; protect potential witnesses; preserve evidenced for possible future legal<br />

proceedings; and maintain and provide access to the commission’s archive with limitations in respect<br />

to disclosing confidential information. 38<br />

Preservation and accessibility to relevant archives is essential to the right to know and duty to<br />

remember. 39 Records of past human rights violations are integral to maintaining the collective memory<br />

and must not be destroyed, removed, hidden or tampered with. The obligation extends to third states<br />

which are expected to cooperate and restore archives. In addition, access must be granted to victims and<br />

their families to enable them to realise their rights to remedies and reparations; to alleged perpetrators to<br />

mount a defence; to the commissions of inquiry to facilitate their work; to persons engaged in historical<br />

research subject to restrictions concerning privacy and security of victims and witnesses. Access<br />

cannot be denied on grounds of national security except were prescribed <strong>by</strong> law and denial is subject<br />

to independent review. Persons named in the archives are entitled to be notified, access the record and<br />

challenge the accuracy of the information through a right of reply, with that reply being included in the<br />

archive. Special attention must be paid to the archives of places of detention or places where serious<br />

human rights and humanitarian law violations took place, particularly where their existence had been<br />

previously denied.<br />

3.2. The present: the right to justice<br />

States should take “prompt, thorough, independent and impartial” investigations of breaches<br />

of human rights and international humanitarian law and perpetrators should be charged, tried and<br />

appropriately punished. 40 States have the primary obligation to investigate and prosecute serious <strong>crimes</strong><br />

under international law; however, where they are unable or unwilling to do so, they must cooperate<br />

with international or internationalized tribunals. 41 For states whose judiciary has been decimated due to<br />

armed conflict or authoritarian rule, experiences at the international level have led to a move away from<br />

international tribunals like the ad hoc International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia to mixed<br />

tribunals or internationalized tribunals like the ones established in Sierra Leone or Lebanon. 42 Also,<br />

there has been a proliferation of domestic initiatives like the establishment of specialised civilian courts,<br />

prosecutorial offices, police units and so forth to investigate serious human rights violations. 43 Military<br />

tribunals must not try violations of human rights law. 44 This must be undertaken <strong>by</strong> ordinary domestic<br />

courts, or in the case of serious <strong>crimes</strong> under international law <strong>by</strong> international or internationalized<br />

courts. 45<br />

The right to justice overlaps with the victim’s right to equal and effective access to judicial remedy. 46<br />

While the state has primary competence in prosecution of perpetrators, victims and their families<br />

37<br />

Ibid., Principles 7 and 11.<br />

38<br />

Ibid., Principles 8 and 13.<br />

39<br />

Ibid., Principles 14 to 18. Archives are defined as “collections of documents pertaining to violations of human rights and humanitarian<br />

law from sources including (a) national governmental agencies, particularly those that played significant roles in relation to human rights<br />

violations; (b) local agencies, such as police stations, that were involved in human rights violations; (c) state agencies, including the office<br />

of the prosecutor and the judiciary, that are involved in the protection of human rights; and (d) materials collected <strong>by</strong> truth commissions<br />

and other investigative bodies”. Ibid., p. 6.<br />

40<br />

Ibid., Principle 19. See generally United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict<br />

States. Prosecution initiatives, United Nations, New York–Geneva 2006.<br />

41<br />

Ibid., Principle 20. States should also adopt effective domestic laws to enable them to exercise universal jurisdiction in respect of such<br />

<strong>crimes</strong> in accordance with treaty and customary law. They must exercise this obligation in respect of persons against whom there is<br />

credible evidence and if they do not to extradite them to face trial before an international tribunal: Principle 21.<br />

42<br />

See generally United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States. Maximising<br />

the Legacy of Hybrid Courts, United Nations, New York–Geneva 2008.<br />

43<br />

E/CN.4/2004/88, para. 41.<br />

44<br />

E/CN.4/Sub.2/2002/4.<br />

45<br />

2005 Set of Principles to Combat Impunity, UN Doc.E/CN.4/2005/102/Add.1, Principle 29.<br />

46<br />

2005 Basic Principles and Guidelines on Reparations, UN Doc.A/Res/60/147, paras. 12–14.<br />

270

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!