crimes committed by totalitarian regimes - Ministrstvo za pravosodje
crimes committed by totalitarian regimes - Ministrstvo za pravosodje
crimes committed by totalitarian regimes - Ministrstvo za pravosodje
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Crimes <strong>committed</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>totalitarian</strong> <strong>regimes</strong><br />
Girts Valdis Kristovskis *<br />
The need for a reAppraisal of the European history<br />
First, I would like to express my thanks for having the opportunity to participate at the 1 st European<br />
Hearing on “Crimes Committed <strong>by</strong> Totalitarian Regimes”, which was organised <strong>by</strong> the Commission<br />
and the Presidency of the European Council, on the initiative of Justice Commissioner Frattini.<br />
I would like to emphasise that, as someone from Eastern Europe – Latvia, the general attitude<br />
of “old, democratic Europe” to questions relating to reflection on historical events, which took place<br />
around the time of World War II, is not acceptable to me. That was a time when two <strong>totalitarian</strong> <strong>regimes</strong>,<br />
namely Nazi Germany and the Stalinist Soviet Union, collaborated and started war, destroying a whole<br />
group of democratic European States. Among those states were the Baltic States. Millions of people<br />
suffered. They were transferred to, and incarcerated in, the death camps of both <strong>totalitarian</strong> <strong>regimes</strong>. In<br />
this way, several tens of millions of people in the USSR and its occupied territories were annihilated.<br />
The destruction of nationally minded and patriotic people at the hand of the exterminating power of<br />
the USSR continued long after Nazi Germany was crushed. Thousands of people in the Baltic States,<br />
using partisan methods, continued to fight the occupation forces for more than ten years after the end<br />
of World War Two. Many hoped that the Western democracies would help the Baltic States to regain<br />
their independence, giving them the chance to return to Western values, their cultural and a democratic<br />
environment. However, the Western democracies, taking account only their own interests and fearful<br />
of the military power of the USSR, accepted at length – for over half a century – the subjugation of the<br />
nations of Eastern Europe, and their societies, to the whims of the Communist <strong>regimes</strong>. We will have<br />
the opportunity to ascertain the consequences of this Western ideology for a long time.<br />
Even today, nearly 20 years after the collapse of the USSR, there continues a denial of the <strong>crimes</strong><br />
of Stalinist Communist <strong>regimes</strong>. Especially absurd is the fact that Nazi <strong>crimes</strong> are condemned, but<br />
Communist <strong>crimes</strong> are justified (or excused), or are grossly trivialised. Unfortunately, even today,<br />
Russia still endeavours to justify the repressions in the Baltic States, both in the pre-war and postwar<br />
periods, as having been essential. That cannot be permitted. Such double standards destroy the<br />
prestige of the European Union, lead to disbelief and are contradictory to the stated aims of the Berlin<br />
Declaration adopted last year which provides inter alia that “the unnatural division of Europe is now<br />
consigned to the past. European integration shows that we have learnt the painful lessons of a history<br />
marked <strong>by</strong> bloody conflict”.<br />
Yes – it is true that the deceased are no longer able to defend themselves. However, to the ears of<br />
those, who are still alive, but suffered at the hands of the repressive communist <strong>regimes</strong> in the states<br />
of Eastern Europe, phrases such as those in the Berlin Declaration, a document supposedly espousing<br />
values, sound like cheap lies. A whole lot of questions arise from this. What was intended <strong>by</strong> the Berlin<br />
Declaration? What has today’s Europe concretely learned from its painful past? You will ask why?<br />
Let me give you an example. Last year the EU Justice Ministers reached agreement on a Framework<br />
Decision on combating certain forms and expressions of racism and xenophobia.<br />
It deals with such <strong>crimes</strong> as incitement to hatred and violence and publicly condoning or grossly<br />
trivializing <strong>crimes</strong> of genocide, <strong>crimes</strong> against humanity and war <strong>crimes</strong>: “/.../ as defined in the Statute of<br />
the International Criminal Court (Articles 6, 7, 8) and also <strong>crimes</strong> defined <strong>by</strong> the Tribunal of Nuremberg<br />
(Article 6 of the Charter of the International Military Tribunal, London Agreement of 1945).” 1<br />
The Framework Decision underlines, that “Member States will ensure that such conduct may be<br />
punishable <strong>by</strong> imprisonment”. 2<br />
The reference to the Nuremberg Tribunal unmistakably shows that it relates only to Nazi <strong>crimes</strong>.<br />
But at the same time, the Framework decision underlines, that “it does not cover <strong>crimes</strong> <strong>committed</strong><br />
on other grounds e.g. <strong>by</strong> <strong>totalitarian</strong> <strong>regimes</strong>”. 3<br />
* Girts Valdis Kristovskis, Member of the European Parliament.<br />
1<br />
Framework decision on Racism and Xenophobia, Council of the EU, Luxembourg, 19 April 2007 8665/07.<br />
2<br />
Framework decision on Racism and Xenophobia, Council of the EU, Luxembourg, 19 April 2007 8665/07.<br />
3<br />
Framework decision on Racism and Xenophobia, Council of the EU, Luxembourg, 19 April 2007 8665/07.<br />
223