22.11.2013 Views

crimes committed by totalitarian regimes - Ministrstvo za pravosodje

crimes committed by totalitarian regimes - Ministrstvo za pravosodje

crimes committed by totalitarian regimes - Ministrstvo za pravosodje

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Crimes <strong>committed</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>totalitarian</strong> <strong>regimes</strong><br />

Girts Valdis Kristovskis *<br />

The need for a reAppraisal of the European history<br />

First, I would like to express my thanks for having the opportunity to participate at the 1 st European<br />

Hearing on “Crimes Committed <strong>by</strong> Totalitarian Regimes”, which was organised <strong>by</strong> the Commission<br />

and the Presidency of the European Council, on the initiative of Justice Commissioner Frattini.<br />

I would like to emphasise that, as someone from Eastern Europe – Latvia, the general attitude<br />

of “old, democratic Europe” to questions relating to reflection on historical events, which took place<br />

around the time of World War II, is not acceptable to me. That was a time when two <strong>totalitarian</strong> <strong>regimes</strong>,<br />

namely Nazi Germany and the Stalinist Soviet Union, collaborated and started war, destroying a whole<br />

group of democratic European States. Among those states were the Baltic States. Millions of people<br />

suffered. They were transferred to, and incarcerated in, the death camps of both <strong>totalitarian</strong> <strong>regimes</strong>. In<br />

this way, several tens of millions of people in the USSR and its occupied territories were annihilated.<br />

The destruction of nationally minded and patriotic people at the hand of the exterminating power of<br />

the USSR continued long after Nazi Germany was crushed. Thousands of people in the Baltic States,<br />

using partisan methods, continued to fight the occupation forces for more than ten years after the end<br />

of World War Two. Many hoped that the Western democracies would help the Baltic States to regain<br />

their independence, giving them the chance to return to Western values, their cultural and a democratic<br />

environment. However, the Western democracies, taking account only their own interests and fearful<br />

of the military power of the USSR, accepted at length – for over half a century – the subjugation of the<br />

nations of Eastern Europe, and their societies, to the whims of the Communist <strong>regimes</strong>. We will have<br />

the opportunity to ascertain the consequences of this Western ideology for a long time.<br />

Even today, nearly 20 years after the collapse of the USSR, there continues a denial of the <strong>crimes</strong><br />

of Stalinist Communist <strong>regimes</strong>. Especially absurd is the fact that Nazi <strong>crimes</strong> are condemned, but<br />

Communist <strong>crimes</strong> are justified (or excused), or are grossly trivialised. Unfortunately, even today,<br />

Russia still endeavours to justify the repressions in the Baltic States, both in the pre-war and postwar<br />

periods, as having been essential. That cannot be permitted. Such double standards destroy the<br />

prestige of the European Union, lead to disbelief and are contradictory to the stated aims of the Berlin<br />

Declaration adopted last year which provides inter alia that “the unnatural division of Europe is now<br />

consigned to the past. European integration shows that we have learnt the painful lessons of a history<br />

marked <strong>by</strong> bloody conflict”.<br />

Yes – it is true that the deceased are no longer able to defend themselves. However, to the ears of<br />

those, who are still alive, but suffered at the hands of the repressive communist <strong>regimes</strong> in the states<br />

of Eastern Europe, phrases such as those in the Berlin Declaration, a document supposedly espousing<br />

values, sound like cheap lies. A whole lot of questions arise from this. What was intended <strong>by</strong> the Berlin<br />

Declaration? What has today’s Europe concretely learned from its painful past? You will ask why?<br />

Let me give you an example. Last year the EU Justice Ministers reached agreement on a Framework<br />

Decision on combating certain forms and expressions of racism and xenophobia.<br />

It deals with such <strong>crimes</strong> as incitement to hatred and violence and publicly condoning or grossly<br />

trivializing <strong>crimes</strong> of genocide, <strong>crimes</strong> against humanity and war <strong>crimes</strong>: “/.../ as defined in the Statute of<br />

the International Criminal Court (Articles 6, 7, 8) and also <strong>crimes</strong> defined <strong>by</strong> the Tribunal of Nuremberg<br />

(Article 6 of the Charter of the International Military Tribunal, London Agreement of 1945).” 1<br />

The Framework Decision underlines, that “Member States will ensure that such conduct may be<br />

punishable <strong>by</strong> imprisonment”. 2<br />

The reference to the Nuremberg Tribunal unmistakably shows that it relates only to Nazi <strong>crimes</strong>.<br />

But at the same time, the Framework decision underlines, that “it does not cover <strong>crimes</strong> <strong>committed</strong><br />

on other grounds e.g. <strong>by</strong> <strong>totalitarian</strong> <strong>regimes</strong>”. 3<br />

* Girts Valdis Kristovskis, Member of the European Parliament.<br />

1<br />

Framework decision on Racism and Xenophobia, Council of the EU, Luxembourg, 19 April 2007 8665/07.<br />

2<br />

Framework decision on Racism and Xenophobia, Council of the EU, Luxembourg, 19 April 2007 8665/07.<br />

3<br />

Framework decision on Racism and Xenophobia, Council of the EU, Luxembourg, 19 April 2007 8665/07.<br />

223

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!