22.11.2013 Views

crimes committed by totalitarian regimes - Ministrstvo za pravosodje

crimes committed by totalitarian regimes - Ministrstvo za pravosodje

crimes committed by totalitarian regimes - Ministrstvo za pravosodje

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Crimes <strong>committed</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>totalitarian</strong> <strong>regimes</strong><br />

issue and enforce the confiscation, the sole statement that a person was of German nationality or a citizen<br />

of the Third Reich was sufficient. Because the guilt of such a person did not need to be established,<br />

such confiscations were not ordered <strong>by</strong> the courts but <strong>by</strong> the administrative authorities, i.e. confiscation<br />

commissions. These commissions issued 20,293 decisions on the confiscation of “German” property<br />

from August until the end of December 1945. These confiscations affected members of the German<br />

minority in Slovenia, as they lost all their property and were expelled from Slovenia.<br />

During the period from 1945 to 1946, the property of those who were killed during the war <strong>by</strong><br />

the partisan resistance movement was also confiscated as the property of “national enemies”. The<br />

administrative authorities confiscated their property on the basis of Article 28 of the Act on Confiscation<br />

of Property and Implementation of Confiscation of 9 June 1945. 11 The actual guilt of the person whose<br />

property was confiscated was not ascertained at all. The following principle applied: a person who was<br />

killed <strong>by</strong> the partisans was guilty, and proof of his/her guilt was his/her liquidation. There were 3,600<br />

confiscations ordered in Slovenia. 12<br />

Likewise, the administrative authorities confiscated the property of those whom they deprived of<br />

citizenship. These were almost exclusively people who had lost their citizenship because they did not<br />

want to return to Yugoslavia after the war or who had emigrated from Yugoslavia. In the second case these<br />

were mostly economic emigrants. The administrative authorities for internal affairs began to implement<br />

confiscations of property on the grounds of deprivation of citizenship in 1949, and implemented them<br />

into the sixties. By 1952, the property of 545 persons had been confiscated in this manner. 13<br />

In the period from July to August 1945, military courts and the Court of the Slovenian National<br />

Honour issued numerous confiscations of property as a side sentence on convicted “national enemies”.<br />

During that time, the above courts sentenced more than 1,500 persons 14 to confiscation of property. An<br />

important share in issuing confiscations was also held <strong>by</strong> the courts of civil jurisdiction (district and<br />

local), which in the period from 1947 to 1951 issued the following number of confiscations: 15<br />

Year 1947 1948 1949 1950 1951<br />

Number of confiscations 290 496 730 351 90<br />

6. Implementation of political and show trials<br />

The Communist authorities also abused the judiciary in order to settle accounts with their actual<br />

and potential opponents (“interior enemies”). By implementing the revolutionary principle of the “unity<br />

of powers”, the judiciary in Slovenia lost the status of an independent branch of power and as a result<br />

lost its independence as well. It became an instrument in the hands of the Communist Party and its<br />

means for implementation of repression. 16 The concept of the role of courts as understood in those<br />

times is demonstrated <strong>by</strong> the report of the President of the District Court in Celje from 1948, where he<br />

wrote, among other things: “/…/ Beyond doubt the court is a fighting body that has to combat the class<br />

enemies. It should be particularly attentive to the remains of capitalism that may emerge in any form, it<br />

should take care of covered up enemies who act in a refined manner against the interests of the people<br />

and who in a covert way, either directly or indirectly, serve and support international reactionary forces<br />

via different channels. The court must be a sharp weapon in the hands of the working people, <strong>by</strong> which<br />

they fight against the enemies and for the victory of socialism /…/” 17<br />

Immediately after the war, criminal justice in Slovenia was carried out <strong>by</strong> military courts and the<br />

Court of the Slovenian National Honour. Before that, in July and August 1945, mass trials against the<br />

11<br />

Official Gazette of Democratic Federative Yugoslavia, No. 40/1945.<br />

12<br />

ARS, KUNI, archive box 2, general matters, paper <strong>by</strong> Milan Lemež on the issues of national property.<br />

13<br />

ARS, Republic Secretariat for Internal Affairs, A-13-0, Reports for the years 1949, 1950, 1951 and 1952.<br />

14<br />

Lists of persons sentenced to confiscation of property. The lists were issued <strong>by</strong> the Commission for administration of national property in<br />

1945.<br />

15<br />

ARS, Ministry of Justice of the People’s Republic of Slovenia, Judicial Statistics for 1947, 1948, 1949 and 1950.<br />

16<br />

The work <strong>by</strong> Roman Ferjančič and Lovro Šturm examines the post-war revolutionary criminal justice in Slovenia. Lawless state,<br />

Slovenian justice after 1945, Nova revija, Ljubljana 1998.<br />

17<br />

Historical Archives of Celje, MLO Celje, box 197, sign. of the archive unit: 1293, Reports of the District and Local Courts of Celje.<br />

167

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!