Participation and partnership: a critical discourse analysis ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$(Medieunders\370gelse: Muslimer omtales negativt og ensidigt ...$

Extract 4 • F1 construes science as needing interpretation and open to public debate. • Industry spokesman construes science as fact ratified by experts, signed, sealed and delivered over to society. • Changing the discourse of science can help open up democratic dialogue? • The questioner ‘gets emotional’. NB the habitual official contrast between scientific rationality and ‘emotive’ public interventions. • Does not a democratic logic involves passions?
Conclusions • Public ‘involvement’ officially envisaged + enforced by chairs is very limited • Some participants shift meetings towards public deliberation of policy, challenge Government + assert their capacity/right to pursue their own strategies in policy debates as equals • A democratic logic is imposed with some success within an event/procedure controlled by a regulative logic.
Page 1 and 2: Participation and partnership: a cr
Page 3 and 4: Outline • Illustration: ‘partic
Page 5 and 6: Regulation and Democracy • Democr
Page 7 and 8: Changing states: tendencies towards
Page 9 and 10: Changing states: tendencies towards
Page 11 and 12: Field of research Objects of trans-
Page 13 and 14: Participatory events: some notes
Page 15 and 16: Crop trials • ‘The objective is
Page 17 and 18: Crop trials • No formal mechanism
Page 19 and 20: Public Involvement • Involvement
Page 21 and 22: Extract 1 • M1 making statements
Page 23 and 24: Extract 2 • Hawthorne’ s questi
Page 25: Extract 3 • Questions are element
Page 29 and 30: Conclusions • Suggests that regul

Participation and partnership: a critical discourse analysis ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?