25.10.2012 Views

Creatine and Creatinine Metabolism - Physiological Reviews

Creatine and Creatinine Metabolism - Physiological Reviews

Creatine and Creatinine Metabolism - Physiological Reviews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

July 2000 CREATINE AND CREATININE METABOLISM 1163<br />

depending on the temperature or on other parameters,<br />

different reaction pathways must also be considered for<br />

the formation of PhIP.<br />

Only a few studies have addressed the question of<br />

whether Cr(n) may be substituted by other guanidines in<br />

the formation of AIA mutagens. In binary mixtures with<br />

amino acids or ribose as well as in ternary mixtures with<br />

Gly <strong>and</strong> glucose, other guanidines (Arg, N G -methyl-L-arginine,<br />

1-methylguanidine, aminoguanidine, <strong>and</strong> guanidine)<br />

yielded at least eightfold lower mutagenicity than Cr (491,<br />

613, 721). In ternary mixtures with Phe <strong>and</strong> glucose, however,<br />

1-methylguanidine gave rise to even higher mutagenicity<br />

than Cr. Unfortunately, nothing is known so far<br />

about the nature of the mutagens formed in these model<br />

systems.<br />

Patients with chronic renal failure are subject to an<br />

increased cancer risk. As is discussed in section IXH, the<br />

serum concentration of Crn is drastically increased in<br />

these patients, thereby creating “favorable” conditions for<br />

the formation of AIA. In fact, 8-MeIQx was detected in the<br />

dialysis fluid of all uremic patients examined (1134). The<br />

notion that this 8-MeIQx does not originate from meat<br />

consumption, but from de novo synthesis, is supported by<br />

the formation of AIA in a model system at as low a<br />

temperature as 37°C (591). The actual rate of in vivo AIA<br />

synthesis in uremic patients as well as its contribution to<br />

cancer development remain to be established.<br />

In conclusion, the studies on cooked foods <strong>and</strong> on<br />

model systems provide valuable information on the structure<br />

<strong>and</strong> on potential precursors of AIA mutagens. On the<br />

other h<strong>and</strong>, we still await a breakthrough in the underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

of the reactions involved in the formation of the<br />

individual classes of AIA mutagens. This knowledge, in<br />

turn, may help to define new strategies for reducing this<br />

potential health risk.<br />

2. Mutagenicity <strong>and</strong> carcinogenicity of AIA<br />

For routine purposes, mutagenicity of AIA compounds<br />

is normally measured with the Ames test, using<br />

primarily the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98,<br />

TA1538, <strong>and</strong> TA100. As can be seen in Table 2, AIA<br />

compounds are in general more mutagenic toward TA98<br />

<strong>and</strong> TA1538, which are sensitive to frameshift mutations,<br />

than toward TA100, a strain that is sensitive to base<br />

substitutions. The high specific mutagenicities toward<br />

TA98 rank the AIA compounds among the most mutagenic<br />

substances currently known. For comparison, the<br />

carcinogens aflatoxin B1 <strong>and</strong> benzo[a]pyrene display specific<br />

mutagenicities of only 320–28,000 revertants/�g inS.<br />

typhimurium strains TA98 <strong>and</strong> TA100 (see Refs. 119,<br />

215). In the Ames test, AIA compounds are not mutagenic<br />

as such but depend on metabolic activation by a rat liver<br />

S9 (9,000-g supernatant) fraction that contains activating<br />

enzymes that are not present in S. typhimurium (see<br />

below).<br />

The mutagenic potency of AIA compounds was corroborated<br />

in Drosophila as well as in a series of mammalian<br />

cell types such as Chinese hamster ovary <strong>and</strong> lung<br />

cells, mouse small intestinal stem cells, or mouse fibroblasts<br />

(see Refs. 119, 178, 215, 236, 794, 872). AIA compounds<br />

proved to stimulate DNA repair, measured as<br />

unscheduled DNA synthesis, as well as chromosomal<br />

damage, such as sister chromatid exchange <strong>and</strong> chromosomal<br />

aberrations. Furthermore, AIA induced preneoplastic<br />

lesions, e.g., foci positive for placental glutathione<br />

S-transferase (GST) <strong>and</strong> an increase in �-glutamyl<br />

transpeptidase activity in rat liver, or aberrant crypt foci<br />

in the colon of rodents (see Refs. 215, 320, 343, 514, 731).<br />

In all these nonmicrobial systems, the mutagenic activity<br />

of AIA compounds was, in general, much lower than in<br />

the Ames test. In Chinese hamster lung cells, for example,<br />

IQ, MeIQ, <strong>and</strong> 8-MeIQx were even less mutagenic than<br />

benzo[a]pyrene. Whereas in S. typhimurium, PhIP is the<br />

least mutagenic AIA (Table 2), it usually displayed higher<br />

mutagenicity than other AIA in mammalian cell types.<br />

This is noteworthy since in many cooked foods, PhIP is<br />

the most abundant AIA.<br />

The relationships between chemical structure <strong>and</strong><br />

mutagenic activity were studied for a series of IQ analogs<br />

(see Refs. 178, 348, 907). Mutagenicity critically depends<br />

on the 2-amino group as well as on a methyl group either<br />

at the 1- or 3-position of the aminoimidazo ring. When a<br />

methyl group was attached to the 1-position (isoIQ), even<br />

higher mutagenicity was observed toward both TA98 <strong>and</strong><br />

TA100 than when it was attached to the 3-position (IQ).<br />

Substitution of the 2-amino group with one or two methyl<br />

groups progressively decreased mutagenicity toward<br />

TA98 but increased (one methyl group) or only slightly<br />

decreased (two methyl groups) mutagenicity toward<br />

TA100. Mutagenicity also decreased greatly when the nitrogen<br />

atom in the quinoline part of the molecule was<br />

replaced by a carbon atom.<br />

IQ, MeIQ, 8-MeIQx, <strong>and</strong> PhIP were shown to be carcinogenic,<br />

although, so far, only at concentrations much<br />

higher than those normally observed in cooked foods (see<br />

Refs. 215, 289, 413, 523, 723, 794, 797, 872, 886, 920, 1000,<br />

1001, 1096). In mice, tumors were induced in liver, lung,<br />

forestomach, <strong>and</strong> hematopoietic system. In rats, tumors<br />

were observed in liver, Zymbal gl<strong>and</strong>, skin, small <strong>and</strong><br />

large intestine, clitoral gl<strong>and</strong>, mammary gl<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> in the<br />

oral cavity. Finally, in cynomolgus monkeys, only IQ was<br />

carcinogenic <strong>and</strong> induced metastasizing hepatocellular<br />

carcinomas. Apart from apparent species differences in<br />

the carcinogenic effects of AIA compounds, considerable<br />

differences were also observed between individual AIA.<br />

Although the liver is one of the main targets of IQ, MeIQ,<br />

<strong>and</strong> 8-MeIQx in both rats <strong>and</strong> mice, PhIP only induced<br />

colon, mammary, <strong>and</strong> prostate carcinomas in rats <strong>and</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!