25.10.2012 Views

Creatine and Creatinine Metabolism - Physiological Reviews

Creatine and Creatinine Metabolism - Physiological Reviews

Creatine and Creatinine Metabolism - Physiological Reviews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1136 MARKUS WYSS AND RIMA KADDURAH-DAOUK Volume 80<br />

IX. USE OF CREATINE ANALOGS AND<br />

INVERTEBRATE PHOSPHAGENS AS TOOLS<br />

FOR THE STUDY OF THE PHYSIOLOGICAL<br />

FUNCTIONS OF THE CREATINE KINASE<br />

SYSTEM<br />

A. PCr in Comparison With Invertebrate<br />

Phosphagens <strong>and</strong> Synthetic Analogs:<br />

Thermodynamic <strong>and</strong> Kinetic Considerations<br />

In the first account on PCr, Eggleton <strong>and</strong> Eggleton<br />

(213) mentioned that “the supposed inorganic phosphate<br />

of muscle is in certain conditions mainly organic phosphate<br />

of a very labile nature [� PCr], which is so unstable<br />

in acid solution.” This statement explains 1) why this<br />

substance escaped detection before <strong>and</strong> 2) why it was<br />

termed “phosphagen”. Whereas PCr was found predominantly<br />

in vertebrates, a variety of other phosphorylated<br />

guanidino compounds were subsequently identified in invertebrates<br />

<strong>and</strong> were shown to play a physiological role<br />

similar or identical to PCr in vertebrates (Fig. 8) (for<br />

reviews, see Refs. 221, 226, 668, 669, 995, 1092, 1093).<br />

Consequently, the term phosphagen nowadays is used<br />

generally for all phosphorylated guanidino compounds<br />

that may serve to regenerate ATP. PCr is unique in this<br />

family, in so far as it is the only natural phosphagen with<br />

a methyl group attached to the guanidino moiety of the<br />

molecule (bold in Fig. 8). This feature may explain some<br />

of the distinctive chemical properties of PCr.<br />

All of the phosphagens are rather stable in alkaline<br />

solution but are susceptible to acid hydrolysis, with the<br />

acid lability decreasing in the order PCr � PArg � PTc �<br />

PGc (see Refs. 226, 669). Although the rate of PCr hydrolysis<br />

increases with increasing acidity, the rate of hydrolysis<br />

of PArg, PGc, <strong>and</strong> PTc displays a maximum at pH<br />

1.0–3.5. Acid molybdate accelerates the hydrolysis of PCr<br />

but retards that of PArg, PGc, <strong>and</strong> PTc. Depending on<br />

temperature, molybdate concentration, <strong>and</strong> pH, acid hydrolysis<br />

of PCr results in the formation of Cr plus P i<br />

<strong>and</strong>/or Crn plus P i. In contrast, no cyclic products are<br />

formed upon acid hydrolysis of other phosphagens.<br />

The N-methyl group of PCr eliminates almost all<br />

resonance states in the guanidino group (221, 226). In<br />

consequence, PCr is thermodynamically less stable (�G°�<br />

for PCr hydrolysis ��44.6 kJ/mol at 35°C, pH 7.25 <strong>and</strong> 4<br />

mM Mg 2� ) than PArg, PGc, PTc, <strong>and</strong> PL (�G°� ��39.4,<br />

�41.4, �41.5, <strong>and</strong> �41.7 kJ/mol, respectively) (221). The<br />

differences in thermodynamic stability between the various<br />

phosphagens are also reflected in the different electronic<br />

environments of the phosphorus nuclei as visualized<br />

by 31 P-NMR. While the phosphorus nucleus of PCr<br />

displays a chemical shift of �2.57 ppm relative to an<br />

external st<strong>and</strong>ard of o-phosphoric acid, the respective<br />

values for PArg, PGc, PTc, <strong>and</strong> PL are �3.00, �3.03,<br />

�3.03, <strong>and</strong> �3.01 ppm, respectively (221).<br />

The �G°� for PCr hydrolysis is also more negative<br />

than that for ATP hydrolysis (�45.1 vs. �35.7 kJ/mol in<br />

the absence of Mg 2� , �45.0 vs. �31.8 kJ/mol at 1 mM<br />

Mg 2� ; pH 7.0, 38°C, I � 0.25 M) (538; see also Refs. 451,<br />

474). This implies, under the assumption of near-equilibrium<br />

conditions for the CK reaction in the cytosol, that<br />

the free energy change (� affinity) of ATP hydrolysis<br />

{defined as A � -dG/d� � ��G°� � RT ln([ATP]/<br />

[ADP][P i]), where d� st<strong>and</strong>s for the advancement of the<br />

reaction} <strong>and</strong> thus the phosphorylation potential in a cell<br />

can be buffered efficiently at much higher values by PCr<br />

<strong>and</strong> Cr than by ATP <strong>and</strong> ADP alone. Buffering of the<br />

phosphorylation potential, in turn, seems to be crucial for<br />

some cellular processes, especially for the Ca 2� -ATPase<br />

of the SR which depends on a free energy change for ATP<br />

hydrolysis of at least 52 kJ/mol to allow proper muscle<br />

relaxation (310, 451). The notion that CK may help in<br />

maintaining high phosphorylation potentials in the intimate<br />

vicinity of crucial ATPases is indeed supported by<br />

the close functional coupling <strong>and</strong> the colocalization observed<br />

for CK <strong>and</strong> Ca 2� -ATPase of the SR (see Ref. 646).<br />

Based on the �G°� values for ATP <strong>and</strong> PCr hydrolysis,<br />

the equilibrium constant for the reaction ATP � Cr 7<br />

ADP � PCr, K� �([�ATP][�Cr])/([�ADP][�PCr]), where<br />

� represents the sum of all ionized <strong>and</strong> Mg 2� -complexed<br />

forms in solution <strong>and</strong> where pH is taken to be constant at<br />

7.0, was calculated to be 37.8 in the absence of Mg 2� <strong>and</strong><br />

166 at a free Mg 2� concentration of 1 mM (38°C, I � 0.25<br />

M) (538). Because K� critically depends on pH, temperature,<br />

[Mg 2� ], <strong>and</strong> probably also on the concentrations of<br />

other monovalent <strong>and</strong> divalent cations (see Refs. 287,<br />

538), reported values for K� (e.g., Refs. 421, 518, 574)<br />

should be taken as rough estimates <strong>and</strong> should not be<br />

compared directly without considering differences in experimental<br />

conditions.<br />

It may be asked at this stage why evolution has<br />

“chosen” PCr for the vertebrates <strong>and</strong> a variety of more<br />

stable phosphagens for the invertebrates. Over many<br />

years, the hypothesis that PArg is simply the evolutionary<br />

precursor of PCr has attracted much attention (see, for<br />

example, Refs. 1092, 1093). Evidently, this hypothesis implies<br />

that PCr in some respect represents a functional<br />

improvement over PArg. Even though the common ancestral<br />

gene of all guanidino kinases may in fact have been an<br />

arginine kinase (ArgK), only unsatisfactory arguments are<br />

available for explaining the current distribution of the<br />

various phosphagens in the animal kingdom.<br />

PCr is the only phosphagen in vertebrates, but it is<br />

also found in spermatozoa of a wide variety of invertebrates<br />

(for reviews, see Refs. 221, 811, 1092). In these<br />

invertebrate species, PCr in spermatozoa may coexist<br />

with one or even two other phosphagens in other tissues<br />

(pluriphosphagen phenomenon) (221, 668, 811, 1092). In<br />

sea urchins of the class Echinoidea, for example, PCr is<br />

the sole phosphagen in spermatozoa, whereas the differ-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!