YEARS OF EUROPEAN ONLINE ANNÉES DE EN LIGNE ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

y the deinition of subields. One project which proceeded in this way is mIReG (managing resources for e-government). mIReG is the result of an IDA project between the United Kingdom and the EU. Not all these approaches are appropriate for the juridical description of documents. At the irst meeting of the working group a list of metadata ields was identiied and subsequently completed (see the synopsis in Annex 1). this list has the following features. • Some of the mentioned ields are used in various countries under more or less the same name. • Other ields are speciic to a certain country, and the concept seems not to be taken into account elsewhere. • Some of the deinitions overlap and need to be clariied. In order to analyse how far existing standards could be used for the metadata ields collected in the synopsis, DCmI was applied, leading to the following results: Metadata fields collected in the synopsis DCMI Identiier on metadata level identiier Information (issue number, issue name, approval date, printing date) identiier Reference to oficial journal relation Subject subject Act ./. Additionally used abbreviation ./. Authors service (ministry) creator Code number ./. Consolidated or not type Contents description Date of adoption/signature date Date of application date Date of decision date Date of enactment date Date of entering into force date Date of expiration date Date of publishing/publication date Date of repeal date Date of the law date Document type ./. Keywords (subject of the document) subject Language of the document language Nickname of the legal document (subject, friendly name) ./. Number used in the ministry archives ./. 01_2007_5222_txt_ML.indd 92 6-12-2007 15:13:49
WORKSHOP Metadata fields collected in the synopsis DCMI Oficial abbreviation ./. Original vs amendment ./. Preamble ./. Reference to basic legislation relation Reference to changing text (if consolidated) relation Reference to directive (if applicable) relation Reference to draft source Reference to modiied acts relation Reference to next version (if consolidated) relation Reference to previous version (if consolidated) relation Reference to source (if consolidated) relation Reference to translation relation References relation Region code ./. Reprint or not type Signature creator Status (in force or not) type Summary ./. title title Some of the ields are indeed covered by corresponding descriptors in DCmI. however, most of these descriptors have to be used more than once, so the real meaning of a metadata ield is no longer evident. Other ields are not covered at all. As a consequence the need for a speciic markup system for metadata in legal documents became obvious. So it was decided to identify relevant metadata ields and to deine their role within the juridical analysis of the object. 5. tEChNICAL SOLUtION the metadata glossary has been transformed into an XmL schema (see Annex 2A) and a parallel DtD (see Annex 2C). Both grammars are mutually interchangeable. the parsing with the schema, however, gives more details on the correctness of the instance. this becomes evident when comparing the models for the CELEX number: in the DtD it is only a sequence of characters, while in the schema a pattern is deined which helps to control the syntax of the codes while parsing. the names of the deined elements all start with the preix ‘efog.’. this guarantees that the elements may always be identiied within the local 92 | 93 01_2007_5222_txt_ML.indd 93 6-12-2007 15:13:49
Page 1 and 2:
Speeches and proceedings 25th anniv
Page 3 and 4:
25 YEARS OF ONLINE THE EVENT 25 ANN
Page 5 and 6:
INTRODUCTION APRèS LA PUBLICAtION
Page 10 and 11:
wORKShOP Legal XmL — Use of XmL f
Page 12 and 13:
01_2007_5222_txt_ML.indd 12 6-12-20
Page 14 and 15:
Cette énumération des participant
Page 16 and 17:
01_2007_5222_txt_ML.indd 16 6-12-20
Page 18 and 19:
sion a fait de l’initiative «mie
Page 20 and 21:
II. «mIEUX LéGIféRER» Et L’AC
Page 22 and 23:
01_2007_5222_txt_ML.indd 22 6-12-20
Page 24 and 25:
• et L. E. Allen, spécialiste de
Page 26 and 27:
La création d’un réseau de coop
Page 28 and 29:
01_2007_5222_txt_ML.indd 28 6-12-20
Page 30 and 31:
Stele so weit nähern, dass er den
Page 32 and 33:
nicht autorisierte Abschrift der of
Page 34 and 35:
„Die Anforderungen und Bedingunge
Page 36 and 37:
hat, „Zugänglichkeit und Verstä
Page 38 and 39:
Old testament. this passage is set
Page 40 and 41:
this checkpoint is given a Priority
Page 42 and 43: knowledge of the law. Adults, child
Page 44 and 45: It is a dificult task to predict th
Page 47 and 48: MEETING OF THE COUNCIL WORKING PART
Page 49 and 50: SOUVENIRS D’UNE DÉLÉGUÉE NATIO
Page 51 and 52: EUR-LEX TODAY AND TOMORROW After mo
Page 59 and 60: DOCUMENT ANALYSIS AND LEGAL INFORMA
Page 67 and 68: LIFE AS A CELEX HOST INtRODUCtION I
Page 73 and 74: CONCLUSIONS first, I would like to
Page 75 and 76: En tant que déléguée de la Grèc
Page 77 and 78: LEGAL XML — USE OF XML FOR THE PR
Page 79 and 80: WORKSHOP • publishing technologie
Page 81 and 82: WORKSHOP • NiR and the NiR editor
Page 83 and 84: WORKSHOP tors, thus providing the o
Page 85 and 86: WORKSHOP 3. SCOPE the expected resu
Page 87 and 88: WORKSHOP gestützt auf die Verordnu
Page 89 and 90: WORKSHOP which describe general com
Page 91: WORKSHOP Arithmetic Poetry. Ameri
Page 95 and 96: WORKSHOP tion of the common metadat
Page 97 and 98: ELECTRONIC PUBLISHING OF LEGISLATIO
Page 99 and 100: WORKSHOP the working group has focu
Page 101 and 102: WORKSHOP • the integrity of a rec
Page 103 and 104: WORKSHOP Examples of different appr
Page 105 and 106: WORKSHOP conidence uses certiicatio
Page 107 and 108: WORKSHOP 3. LEGISLAtIVE ISSUES CONC
Page 109 and 110: WORKSHOP signature, is only publish
Page 111 and 112: WORKSHOP 3.2.4. ARE THERE ACTS, DEC
Page 113 and 114: WORKSHOP Electronic signature of PD
Page 115 and 116: WORKSHOP formats are available: htm
Page 117 and 118: WORKSHOP the chain of conidence is
Page 119 and 120: WORKSHOP the object of SOLON is to
Page 121 and 122: WORKSHOP 5. A secure session is now
Page 123 and 124: WORKSHOP ESTONIA A certiicate-based
Page 125 and 126: WORKSHOP ertheless, some assistance
Page 127 and 128: WORKSHOP (b) If the system is XmL-b
Page 129 and 130: COHERENCE OF TERMINOLOGY AND SEARCH
Page 131 and 132: WORKSHOP nym for legal categories,
Page 133 and 134: WORKSHOP Article 4(2) of Directive
Page 135 and 136: WORKSHOP the tool could prove to be
Page 137 and 138: EUR-LEX: FROM DATA STRUCTURES TO LE
Page 139 and 140: WORKSHOP duces a ‘magic result’
Page 141 and 142: WORKSHOP sion of the current one, i
Page 143 and 144:
WORKSHOP for test and demonstration
Page 145 and 146:
WORKSHOP focus on text representati
Page 147 and 148:
WORKSHOP As a irst step, the existi
Page 149 and 150:
WORKSHOP REfERENCES Bench-Capon, t.
Page 151 and 152:
TEXT MINING 1. INtRODUCtION the gro
Page 153 and 154:
WORKSHOP uments. the tasks and obje
Page 155 and 156:
WORKSHOP In order to create more ef
Page 157 and 158:
WORKSHOP jects. the problem, howeve
Page 159 and 160:
WORKSHOP space and their maintenanc
Page 161 and 162:
WORKSHOP the success of the impleme
Page 163 and 164:
WORKSHOP Thesauri thesauri are cont
Page 165 and 166:
WORKSHOP knowledge which are reusab
Page 167 and 168:
WORKSHOP fuhr, Norbert. 2004. Infor
Page 169 and 170:
WORKSHOP Oberle, Daniel; Staab, Ste
Page 171:
En tant que déléguée de la Grèc
Page 175 and 176:
PRESS REVIEW / REVUE DE PRESSE " 17
Page 178 and 179:
01_2007_5222_txt_ML.indd 178 6-12-2
Page 180:
01_2007_5222_txt_ML.indd 180 6-12-2
show all

YEARS OF EUROPEAN ONLINE ANNÉES DE EN LIGNE ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?