Coastal Erosion Responses for Alaska - the National Sea Grant ...
Coastal Erosion Responses for Alaska - the National Sea Grant ...
Coastal Erosion Responses for Alaska - the National Sea Grant ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
20 Motyka et al.—Global <strong>Sea</strong> Level Rise and Relative <strong>Sea</strong> Change in <strong>Alaska</strong><br />
Table 1. Contributions to sea level rise from <strong>the</strong> world’s glaciers.<br />
Region<br />
<strong>Sea</strong> level rise<br />
equivalent<br />
(mm yr-1) Years Reference<br />
<strong>Alaska</strong>/NW Canada 0.14 ± 0.04 1950s-1990s Arendt et al. (2002)<br />
<strong>Alaska</strong>/NW Canada 0.27 ± 0.10 1990s-2000/01 Arendt et al. (2002)<br />
<strong>Alaska</strong>/NW Canada 0.31 ± 0.09 2002-2004 Tamisiea (2005)<br />
Canadian Arctic Archipelago 0.064 1995-2000 Abdalati et al. (2004)<br />
Patagonia 0.042 ± 0.002 1968/75-2000 Rignot et al. (2003)<br />
Patagonia 0.105 ± 0.011 1995-2000 Rignot et al. (2003)<br />
West Antarctica 0.12 ± 0.03 Late 1990s Rignot and Thomas (2002)<br />
West Antarctica 0.2 2002-2003 Thomas et al. (2004)<br />
East Antarctica 0.05 ± 0.06 Late 1990s Rignot and Thomas (2002)<br />
Greenland 0.14 Late 1990s Krabill et al. (2000)<br />
Greenland 0.20 ± 0.07 2002-2004 Velicogna and Wahr (2005)<br />
Greenland 0.23 to 0.55 2002-2005 Rignot (2005)<br />
not take into account <strong>the</strong> accelerated glaciodynamic response that tidewater<br />
glaciers and polar outlet glaciers are now experiencing.<br />
Relative sea level (RSL) change along coastal <strong>Alaska</strong> is a function of GSLR<br />
and also <strong>the</strong> local and regional rates of crustal adjustments to isostatic rebound<br />
from melting glaciers, tectonic processes, and <strong>the</strong> effects of gravity due to<br />
changing ice masses. In <strong>the</strong> latter case, while ice melting adds water to <strong>the</strong><br />
oceans globally, reduced gravitational attraction exerted by <strong>the</strong> shrinking ice<br />
masses can cause a drop in RSL locally. Estimates of this effect in regions<br />
where glacier melting in <strong>Alaska</strong> is strong and ongoing, range from –2.3 mm<br />
yr-1 (Tamisiea et al. 2003), to –0.4 mm yr-1 (Larsen et al. 2004), where negative<br />
indicates a falling relative sea level. The loss of glacier ice is also driving<br />
strong glacial isostatic rebound along much of sou<strong>the</strong>rn coastal <strong>Alaska</strong>. The<br />
effects of this rebound are clearly seen in tide gauge records and in GPS measurements.<br />
The post–Little Ice Age collapse of <strong>the</strong> Glacier Bay ice field (Motyka<br />
and Larsen 2005) and ongoing rapid melting of mountain glaciers throughout<br />
<strong>the</strong> region (C.F. Larsen et al. submitted) has resulted in rebound rates of<br />
as much as 32 mm yr-1 in Glacier Bay, with RSL falling as much as 5.7 m near<br />
Glacier Bay since 1770 AD (Motyka 2003; Larsen et al. 2004, 2005). This broad<br />
dome of uplift extends as far south as Sitka and as far north as Cape Yakataga,<br />
where <strong>the</strong> ~20 mm yr-1 average uplift rate has also been attributed to glacier<br />
rebound (Sauber and Molnia 2004).<br />
Tectonically, <strong>the</strong> strike-slip margin along sou<strong>the</strong>ast <strong>Alaska</strong> contrasts<br />
sharply with <strong>the</strong> collision of <strong>the</strong> Pacific Plate with <strong>the</strong> North American Plate