Download Full PDF - 41.38 MB - The Society of Irish Foresters
Download Full PDF - 41.38 MB - The Society of Irish Foresters Download Full PDF - 41.38 MB - The Society of Irish Foresters
---------------------------------------------------------------------_ .. IRISH FORESTRY 1.40 1.20 1.10 1.00 • Pine unmodified 0.90 • P174 A P177 1.30 1.20 • Spruce unmodified • SPl -& SP2 1.10 1.00 0.90 1.30 • Larch unmodified 1.20 • Ll 1.10 1.00 0.90 0.80 +----+----+----11----+----1 1st dry 2nd dry 3rd dry 1st wet 2nd wet 3rd wet Figure 2. Swelling stability results. The vertical ordinate shows the relative volume change. 56
IRISH FORESTRY Conclusions Mechanical and physical test results obtained with the acetylated materials are broadly in line with what was expected from the European experience. The most surprising result is that increasing the degree of acetylation of the pine from 16 WPG to 19 WPG has relatively little effect on the moisture absorption behaviour. In all cases the scatter in the results was large. The scatter is thought to arise from two factors. First, the relatively coarse nature of the timber arising from the fast growth and wide ring spacing, and secondly there is the probability that the samples tested contained both heartwood and sapwood. This would affect both the response to acetylation and the subsequent response to moisture change in the acetylated materials. Despite these factors it is considered that the overall pattern of results obtained is reliable. The results from the fungal decay experiments have demonstrated the increased durability expected but the better performance of the spruce than the pine was surprising given that in the untreated condition it was less durable, and that it is regarded as less permeable to reagents. Overall the results confirm that the acetylation process offers benefit with the materials examined. It is now necessary to proceed with acetylation experiments using specimens of commercial cross-section. Acknowledgments This research was facilitated by a COFORD grant as Project 4-1-97. Evaluation of the effects of acetylation on Irish softwood. Materials were generously supplied by Palfab, Macroom, Co Cork. References Beckers, E.P.J., Militz, H. and Stevens, M . 1995. Acetylated solid wood laboratory durability tests part 2 and field trials. The International Research Group on Wood Preservation, Doc No IRG/ WP 95-40048 Beckers, E.P.J., de Meijer, M. and Militz, H. 1998. Performance of finishes on wood that is chemically modified by acetylation. Journal of Coatings Technology 70: 59-67. Birkinshaw, C. 1998. Chemically modified wood, a review with consideration of the opportunities for application to Irish timber. Irish Forestry 55(2): 21 -34. Dawson, 8 and Torr, K. 1992. Spectroscopic and colour studies on acetylated radiata pine exposed to UV and visible light. Chemical modification of lignocellulosics. Forest Research Institute, Rotorua, New Zealand, pp 41-50. Hill, c.A.S. and Jones, D. 1996. The dimensional stabilisation of Corsican pine sapwood by reaction with carboxylic acid anhydrides. Holzforschung 50: 457-462. Forster, S.c., Hale, M.D. and Williams, G. 1997. Efficacy of anhydrides as wood protection chemicals. The International Research Group on Wood Preservation, Doc. No. IRGIWP 97- 30162. Larsson, P and Tillman A-M. 1989. Acetylation of lignocellulosic materials. The International Research Group on Wood Preservation, Doc. No. IRGIWP 3516. Martins, v.A. and Banks, W.C.B. 1991. Sorptive properties of chemically modified wood. Wood Protection 1(2): 69-75. Peterson, M.D and Thomas, R.J. 1979. Protection of wood from decay fungi by acetylation - an ultrastructural and chemical study. Wood and Fiber Science 10(3): 149-163. Rowell R.M. Lichtenberg, R.S. and Larsson, P. 1993. Stability of acetylated wood to environmental change. Wood and Fiber Science 25(4): 359-364. Rowell R.M. and Ellis, W.D. 1978. Determination of the dimensional stabilisation of wood using the 57
- Page 15 and 16: IRISH FORESTRY Phenology of shoot g
- Page 17 and 18: IRISH FORESTRY Data analyses All da
- Page 19 and 20: IRISH FORESTRY 60 Seedling height E
- Page 21 and 22: IRISH FORESTRY The date of wrenchin
- Page 23 and 24: IRISH FORESTRY Root collar diameter
- Page 25 and 26: IRISH FORESTRY addition, root growt
- Page 27 and 28: IRISH FORESTRY Rook, D.A. 1971. Eff
- Page 29 and 30: IRISH FORESTRY 3. maintain rural em
- Page 31 and 32: IRISH FORESTRY enhance the organic
- Page 33 and 34: IRISH FORESTRY Figure 1. Normal can
- Page 35 and 36: IRISH FORESTRY In Britain in simila
- Page 37 and 38: IRISH FORESTRY 3. natural regenerat
- Page 39 and 40: IRISH FORESTRY McAdam, lH. and Hopp
- Page 41 and 42: IRISH FORESTRY regeneration is the
- Page 43 and 44: IRISH FORESTRY Table 2. continued V
- Page 45 and 46: IRISH FORESTRY Table 5. continued V
- Page 47 and 48: IRISH FORESTRY all are influenced b
- Page 49 and 50: IRISH FORESTRY Carey, M.L. and Hend
- Page 51 and 52: IRISH FORESTRY Ireland were in need
- Page 53 and 54: IRISH FORESTRY Figure 1. Tree locat
- Page 55 and 56: IRISH FORESTRY The specimens contin
- Page 57 and 58: IRISH FORESTRY TROBI recorded just
- Page 59 and 60: IRISH FORESTRY Mechanical propertie
- Page 61 and 62: IRISH FORESTRY Table 1. Materials i
- Page 63 and 64: IRISH FORESTRY Table 2. Modulus of
- Page 65: IRISH FORESTRY and therefore small
- Page 69 and 70: Trees, Woods and Literature - 26 Ji
- Page 71 and 72: IRISH FORESTRY seconds. Eventually
- Page 73 and 74: Book reviews Sitka spruce in Irelan
- Page 75 and 76: IRISH FORESTRY is sketchy and is di
- Page 77 and 78: IRISH FORESTRY ics manager. The nur
- Page 79 and 80: IRISH FORESTRY 1 indigenous species
- Page 81 and 82: IRISH FORESTRY The arrival of these
- Page 83 and 84: IRISH FORESTRY • elimination of u
- Page 85 and 86: IRISH FORESTRY Tsitsikamma two furt
- Page 87 and 88: IRISH FORESTRY light lunch, most of
- Page 89 and 90: IRISH FORESTRY than 15 cm in diamet
- Page 91 and 92: IRISH FORESTRY Fynbos ueretarion me
- Page 93 and 94: IRISH FORESTRY After a guided tour
- Page 95 and 96: IRISH FORESTRY Mairtin 6 Neachtain
- Page 97 and 98: ecco YOU HAVEN'T TRIED? -IT'S TIME
- Page 99 and 100: Many (J{ Northern Ireland's ji:Jres
- Page 103 and 104: Treeshelters and Spirals Discover T
---------------------------------------------------------------------_ ..<br />
IRISH FORESTRY<br />
1.40<br />
1.20<br />
1.10<br />
1.00<br />
• Pine unmodified<br />
0.90 • P174 A P177<br />
1.30<br />
1.20<br />
• Spruce unmodified<br />
• SPl -& SP2<br />
1.10<br />
1.00<br />
0.90<br />
1.30 • Larch unmodified<br />
1.20<br />
• Ll<br />
1.10<br />
1.00<br />
0.90<br />
0.80 +----+----+----11----+----1<br />
1st dry 2nd dry 3rd dry<br />
1st wet 2nd wet 3rd wet<br />
Figure 2. Swelling stability results. <strong>The</strong> vertical ordinate shows the relative volume<br />
change.<br />
56