Download Full PDF - 41.38 MB - The Society of Irish Foresters

Download Full PDF - 41.38 MB - The Society of Irish Foresters Download Full PDF - 41.38 MB - The Society of Irish Foresters

societyofirishforesters.ie
from societyofirishforesters.ie More from this publisher
19.11.2013 Views

IRISH FORESTRY Application and limitations of the model The model answers some questions about spontaneous natural regeneration of lodgepole pine. Combined with local knowledge it should allow forest managers to predict with greater certainty the occurrence of natural regeneration following the clearfelling of lodgepole pine crops. For example, on poorly-drained (non peat), highly-exposed sites, natural regeneration of lodgepole pine has only a 10% chance of occurring (even if seed were available). On the other hand, natural regeneration is highly likely on sheltered and well-drained sites (assuming that seed is available). The model also provides information as to how to increase the likelihood of lodgepole pine regenerating naturally. For example, thinning not only increases the probability of seed production but also the probability of successful germination and survival. Improving drainage will also increase the chance of natural regeneration occurring. The model is based on a limited number of sites. The standard error of prediction for some categories of the variables reflect this. It is also important to note that a limited number of silvicultural activities were recorded, and some of these, such as the level of brash remaining on the site, were shown in other studies to significantly influence the occurrence of natural regeneration of lodgepole pine (Cochran 1973). No long-term record of silvicultural or harvesting activities, such as the method and time of harvesting had been maintained for the sites in the study. Similarly, the treatment of slash was not recorded. Thus, it was necessary to rely on records that some foresters retained or on their recollection of these activities. As a result, in some instances information on these site activities was not available. Conclusions The increased emphasis on alternative silvicultural systems to clear cutting has increased interest in reforestation using natural regeneration. Recent studies have increased the available information on factors which influence its occurrence (Nixon and Worrell 1999, O'Leary 2000). Increased knowledge and the ability to more accurately predict the occurrence of natural regeneration should encourage foresters to seriously consider using natural regeneration as an alternative to planting on certain sites. Further study is required however, to more fully understand the factors favouring the occurrence of natural regeneration. Acknowledgements The majority of the funding for this study was provided by the COFORD (the National Council for Forest Research and Development). Coillte (The Irish Forestry Board) and the Department of Crop Science, Horticulture and Forestry at University College Dublin also supported the work. References Aldhous, 1.R. and Mason, W.L. 1994. Forest nursery practice. Forestry Commission Bulletin 111. HMSO, London. Allen, P.E. and Trousdell, K.B . 1961. Loblolly pine seed production in the Virginia-North Carolina coastal plain. 1. For. 59: 187-190. . Brown, I.M.B. and Neustein, S.A. 1974. Natural regeneration of conifers in the British Isles. Proceedings of the Royal Horticultural Society 3,d Conference, pp 29-38. 38

IRISH FORESTRY Carey, M.L. and Hendrick, E. 1986. Lodgepole pine in the Republic of Ireland I. Site types, ground preparation and nutrition. For. Ecol. Manage. 15: 301-307. Cochran, P.H. 1973. Natural regeneration of lodgepole pine in south-central Oregon. USDA FS Research Note PNW-204. Dagg, R. 1998. A study of the factors contributing to the presence of natural regeneration of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.) on c1earfell sites in Co. Wicklow. Unpublished M. Sc. Agr Thesis, University College Dublin. Garman, E.H. 1955. Regeneration problems and their silvicultural significance in the coastal forests of British Columbia. Department of lands and forests, BC Technical Publication T 41. Leiffers, V.J. and Rothwell, R.L. 1986. Effects of depth of water-table and substrate temperatures on root and top growth of Picea mariana and Larix laricina seedlings. Can. 1. For. Res. 16: 1202-1206. Lotan, J.E. 1964. Initial germination and survival of lodgepole pine on prepared seedbeds. Research Note INT-29. USDA FS Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. Lotan, J.E. and Perry, D.A. 1983. Ecology and regeneration of lodgepole pine. Agricultural Handbook No. 606, USDA. Lotan, lE. and Critchfield, W.B. 1990. Pinus contorta Doug!. ex. Loud. In: Bums, Russell M.; Honkara, B. H., Tech. Coord. Silvics of No rth America. Vol. I. Conifers. Agriculture Handbook 654, USDA FS, Washington DC. Minore, D. (1972). Germination and early growth of coastal tree species on organic seed beds. Research Paper PNW-135: USDA FS, PNW Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, Oregon. Nixon, C.J. and Worrell, R. 1999. The potential for the natural regeneration of conifers in Britain. Forestry Commission Bulletin 120. HMSO, London. O'Leary, D. 2000. Natural regeneration in lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) and common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) plantations. Unpublished M. Agr. Sc. thesis, National University of Ireland. Pfeifer, A. 1982. Basal sweep in lodgepole pine. Irish For. 39(1): 7-16. Stuart, lD., Agree, 1.K. and Gara, R.I. 1989. Lodgepole pine regeneration in an old self-perpetuating forest in south central Oregon. Can. 1. For. Res. 19: 1096-1104. Wenger, K.F. 1954. The stimulation of loblolly pine seed trees by preharvest release. 1. For. 52: 115-118. 39

IRISH FORESTRY<br />

Application and limitations <strong>of</strong> the model<br />

<strong>The</strong> model answers some questions about spontaneous natural regeneration <strong>of</strong> lodgepole<br />

pine. Combined with local knowledge it should allow forest managers to predict with<br />

greater certainty the occurrence <strong>of</strong> natural regeneration following the clearfelling <strong>of</strong><br />

lodgepole pine crops. For example, on poorly-drained (non peat), highly-exposed sites,<br />

natural regeneration <strong>of</strong> lodgepole pine has only a 10% chance <strong>of</strong> occurring (even if seed<br />

were available). On the other hand, natural regeneration is highly likely on sheltered and<br />

well-drained sites (assuming that seed is available). <strong>The</strong> model also provides information<br />

as to how to increase the likelihood <strong>of</strong> lodgepole pine regenerating naturally. For example,<br />

thinning not only increases the probability <strong>of</strong> seed production but also the probability <strong>of</strong><br />

successful germination and survival. Improving drainage will also increase the chance <strong>of</strong><br />

natural regeneration occurring.<br />

<strong>The</strong> model is based on a limited number <strong>of</strong> sites. <strong>The</strong> standard error <strong>of</strong> prediction for<br />

some categories <strong>of</strong> the variables reflect this. It is also important to note that a limited<br />

number <strong>of</strong> silvicultural activities were recorded, and some <strong>of</strong> these, such as the level <strong>of</strong><br />

brash remaining on the site, were shown in other studies to significantly influence the<br />

occurrence <strong>of</strong> natural regeneration <strong>of</strong> lodgepole pine (Cochran 1973). No long-term record<br />

<strong>of</strong> silvicultural or harvesting activities, such as the method and time <strong>of</strong> harvesting had been<br />

maintained for the sites in the study. Similarly, the treatment <strong>of</strong> slash was not recorded.<br />

Thus, it was necessary to rely on records that some foresters retained or on their recollection<br />

<strong>of</strong> these activities. As a result, in some instances information on these site activities<br />

was not available.<br />

Conclusions<br />

<strong>The</strong> increased emphasis on alternative silvicultural systems to clear cutting has increased<br />

interest in reforestation using natural regeneration. Recent studies have increased the<br />

available information on factors which influence its occurrence (Nixon and Worrell<br />

1999, O'Leary 2000). Increased knowledge and the ability to more accurately predict<br />

the occurrence <strong>of</strong> natural regeneration should encourage foresters to seriously consider<br />

using natural regeneration as an alternative to planting on certain sites. Further study is<br />

required however, to more fully understand the factors favouring the occurrence <strong>of</strong> natural<br />

regeneration.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

<strong>The</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> the funding for this study was provided by the COFORD (the National<br />

Council for Forest Research and Development). Coillte (<strong>The</strong> <strong>Irish</strong> Forestry Board) and the<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Crop Science, Horticulture and Forestry at University College Dublin also<br />

supported the work.<br />

References<br />

Aldhous, 1.R. and Mason, W.L. 1994. Forest nursery practice. Forestry Commission Bulletin 111.<br />

HMSO, London.<br />

Allen, P.E. and Trousdell, K.B . 1961. Loblolly pine seed production in the Virginia-North Carolina<br />

coastal plain. 1. For. 59: 187-190. .<br />

Brown, I.M.B. and Neustein, S.A. 1974. Natural regeneration <strong>of</strong> conifers in the British Isles.<br />

Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the Royal Horticultural <strong>Society</strong> 3,d Conference, pp 29-38.<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!