19.11.2013 Views

Zemes un vides zinātnes Earth and Environment Sciences - Latvijas ...

Zemes un vides zinātnes Earth and Environment Sciences - Latvijas ...

Zemes un vides zinātnes Earth and Environment Sciences - Latvijas ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ACTA UNIVERSITATIS LATVIENSIS, 2004, Vol. 679, pp. 46-56<br />

New anaspid material from the Late Silurian of<br />

Britain <strong>and</strong> Estonia<br />

C. GILES MILLER, TIIU MÄRSS, <strong>and</strong> HENNING BLOM<br />

C. G. Miller, Department of Palaeontology, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London,<br />

SW7 5BD, UK, G.Miller@nhm.ac.uk; T. Märss, Institute of Geology at Tallinn University of<br />

Technology, Estonia Ave 7, Tallinn, 10143, Estonia , marss@gi.ee; H. Blom, Department of<br />

Physiology <strong>and</strong> Development, Evolutionary Organismal Biology, Norbyvägen 18A , Uppsala,<br />

SE-752 36, Sweden, Henning.Blom@ebc.uu.se<br />

A new birkeniid anaspid Trimpleylepis j<strong>un</strong>cta gen. et sp. nov. is described from the Prídolí, late<br />

Silurian at Man Brook, Welsh Borderl<strong>and</strong>. Trimpleylepis concatenata gen. et sp. nov. is described<br />

from the Ohesaare Borehole, Ludlow, Silurian of Estonia. Histological sections show that<br />

Trimpleylepis has similar features to material previously described from the Family Septentrioniidae<br />

Blom, Märss <strong>and</strong> Miller, 2002. However, vascular canals have not been seen in sections of either<br />

species, <strong>and</strong> rare openings of canals have only been seen on one or two specimens of T. concatenata,<br />

so assignment to this family is tentative. Silmalepis cf. erinacea has been identified from Man<br />

Brook <strong>and</strong> extends the range of the genus into the Prídolí. New anaspid material from the late<br />

Silurian of Gardner’s Bank, Welsh Borderl<strong>and</strong> suggests that anaspids from the Family<br />

Rhyncholepididae Kiær, 1924 were present from the mid Wenlock to the late Prídolí.<br />

Key words: Agnathans, anaspids, Welsh Borderl<strong>and</strong>, East Baltic, late Silurian, Ludlow, Prídolí.<br />

Introduction<br />

The uppermost Silurian of the Welsh Borderl<strong>and</strong> has yielded a rich microvertebrate<br />

fa<strong>un</strong>a. The Man Brook locality is no exception, having produced well-preserved<br />

thelodont scales (Turner 1973, 1984; Vergoossen 1995, 1999; Märss <strong>and</strong> Miller in<br />

press), acanthodian scales, teeth <strong>and</strong> fin spines (Vergoosen 1995, 2000), anaspid scales<br />

<strong>and</strong> platelets (Blom et al. 2002) as well as many osteostracan <strong>and</strong> heterostracan scale<br />

<strong>and</strong> shield fragments (collections <strong>and</strong> documentation at The Natural History Museum).<br />

Anaspids are agnathans with a fusiform head, elongate body, a slanting row of branchial<br />

openings on either side of the body <strong>and</strong> a strongly hypocercal tail (see Miller et al. in<br />

press for review). Birkeniid anaspids appear in the geological record as disarticulated<br />

phosphatic scales with an external sculpture <strong>and</strong> a rib on the visceral surface; other<br />

closely related taxa have only spines <strong>and</strong> dorsal scales (e.g. Lasanius Traquair 1898) or<br />

are naked or with a weakly mineralised exoskeleton (e.g. Jamoytius White 1946). For<br />

the purposes of this article, the general term “anaspid” will be used in place of birkeniid<br />

anaspid. Blom et al. (2002) published a taxonomic scheme combining anaspid body<br />

features <strong>and</strong> scale morphology with histology. Anaspids were illustrated from Man<br />

Brook (ibid.) but the collection also contained many other fragments of scales, spines<br />

<strong>and</strong> platelets that were not described or illustrated because the histological structure<br />

was not known from the material available at the time. The external sculpture of these<br />

fragments was consistent with an anaspid affinity, but doubts remained concerning the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!