TITLE PAGE - acumen - The University of Alabama
TITLE PAGE - acumen - The University of Alabama TITLE PAGE - acumen - The University of Alabama
Copyright Michael Patrick Venarsky 2012 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
ABSTRACT Detritus from surface environments supplies the energy that shapes community structure and fuels productivity in most cave ecosystems. However, only qualitative descriptions of cave energy dynamics are available, hindering development of quantitative models describing how energy availability influences cave ecosystem processes. In contrast, the importance of detritus for surface ecosystem processes has been appreciated for decades. This dissertation begins to close this knowledge gap by exploring how energy availability shapes cave stream ecosystem processes at multiple organizational levels (ecosystem-, community-, population-level) and time scales (evolutionary vs. ecological). Chapter Two examined potential correlations between litter breakdown rates and detrital storage, but found no such relationships among four cave streams. However, surface-adapted species dominated macroinvertebrate biomass, suggesting that surface-adapted taxa can have a significant influence on cave ecosystem processes. In Chapter Three, a whole-reach litter amendment was conducted to explore the influence of enhanced detrital inputs on cave community structure and energy flow. While the litter amendment significantly increased total consumer biomass via assimilation of amended corn-litter, the response was dictated by evolutionary history. Biomass of surface-adapted taxa increased significantly following the amendment, while biomass of obligate cave species remained unchanged. As in Chapter Two, consumer biomass was dominated by surface-adapted taxa, reinforcing their role in cave ecosystem processes relative to cave-adapted taxa, the traditional focus of cave studies. ii
- Page 1: THE INFLUENCE OF ENERGY AVAILABILIT
- Page 5 and 6: LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS m
- Page 7 and 8: NC IL ON U.K. VIAT VIE Fig. North C
- Page 9 and 10: AIC K-S Akaike information criterio
- Page 11 and 12: laboratory work and was an excellen
- Page 13 and 14: LIST OF TABLES TABLE 2.1 TABLE 2.2
- Page 15 and 16: LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 2.1 (a) Box
- Page 17 and 18: FIGURE 4.3 Growth models for Orcone
- Page 19 and 20: chemolithoautotrophy-based systems;
- Page 21 and 22: ecology, 51, 31-53. Gibert J. & Cul
- Page 23 and 24: CHAPTER 2 EFFECTS OF ORGANIC MATTER
- Page 25 and 26: community structure in cave “pits
- Page 27 and 28: communities and how variation in co
- Page 29 and 30: the different source locations was
- Page 31 and 32: of natural-log transformed data (%
- Page 33 and 34: peak in organic matter in Big Mouth
- Page 35 and 36: Figs. 5a, b). The breakdown rate of
- Page 37 and 38: per litter bag. Similarly, Huntsman
- Page 39 and 40: ags was the greater retention of li
- Page 41 and 42: Historically, limited resource inpu
- Page 43 and 44: Culver, D.C. & Pipan, T. (2009) The
- Page 45 and 46: Merritt, R.W., Cummins, K.W. & Berg
- Page 47 and 48: Table 1. Mean (1 S.D.) macroinverte
- Page 49 and 50: Table 2. Mean (±1 S.D.) daily temp
- Page 51 and 52: Figure 1. (a) Box and whisker plot
ABSTRACT<br />
Detritus from surface environments supplies the energy that shapes community structure<br />
and fuels productivity in most cave ecosystems. However, only qualitative descriptions <strong>of</strong> cave<br />
energy dynamics are available, hindering development <strong>of</strong> quantitative models describing how<br />
energy availability influences cave ecosystem processes. In contrast, the importance <strong>of</strong> detritus<br />
for surface ecosystem processes has been appreciated for decades. This dissertation begins to<br />
close this knowledge gap by exploring how energy availability shapes cave stream ecosystem<br />
processes at multiple organizational levels (ecosystem-, community-, population-level) and time<br />
scales (evolutionary vs. ecological).<br />
Chapter Two examined potential correlations between litter breakdown rates and detrital<br />
storage, but found no such relationships among four cave streams. However, surface-adapted<br />
species dominated macroinvertebrate biomass, suggesting that surface-adapted taxa can have a<br />
significant influence on cave ecosystem processes. In Chapter Three, a whole-reach litter<br />
amendment was conducted to explore the influence <strong>of</strong> enhanced detrital inputs on cave<br />
community structure and energy flow. While the litter amendment significantly increased total<br />
consumer biomass via assimilation <strong>of</strong> amended corn-litter, the response was dictated by<br />
evolutionary history. Biomass <strong>of</strong> surface-adapted taxa increased significantly following the<br />
amendment, while biomass <strong>of</strong> obligate cave species remained unchanged. As in Chapter Two,<br />
consumer biomass was dominated by surface-adapted taxa, reinforcing their role in cave<br />
ecosystem processes relative to cave-adapted taxa, the traditional focus <strong>of</strong> cave studies.<br />
ii