TITLE PAGE - acumen - The University of Alabama
TITLE PAGE - acumen - The University of Alabama TITLE PAGE - acumen - The University of Alabama
Table 4. Mean capture rate (range), % crayfish recaptured (range), population size (error) from Program MARK, biomass (95% confidence interval), production (95% confidence interval), and production:biomass (95% confidence interval) of Orconectes australis within Hering, Limrock, and Tony Sinks caves. Significant differences among caves are indicated by different letters. AFDM = ashfree dry mass. Hering Limrock Tony Sinks Capture rate (individuals month -1 ) 35 (13-67) 43 (9-90) 71 (28-126) % crayfish recaptured (month -1 ) 35 (11-60) 39 (8-62) 20 (3-43) Population size (individuals) 1311 (50) 1380 (41) 5044 (196) Biomass (mg AFDM m -2 ) 132 (141 - 123) A 79.5 (84 - 75) B 862 (929 - 795) C Production (mg AFDM m -2 yr -1 ) 37 (42 - 32) a 21 (24 - 18) b 335 (402 - 267) c Production:biomass ratio 0.28 (0.31 - 0.25) Y 0.27 (0.30 - 0.24) Y 0.39 (0.46 - 0.32) Z 127
Table 5. Estimates of mean wood and leaf supply rates, macroinvertebrate production, and crayfish demand in Hering, Limrock, and Tony Sinks caves. All values are g ash free dry mass m -2 yr -1 . Numbers in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals. Crayfish demand Crayfish demand Cave Wood supply rate Leaf supply rate Macroinvertebrate production (organic matter) (macroinvertebrates) Hering 13 (7-19) 47 (22-73) 0.13 (0.05-0.21) 0.82 (0.63-1) 0.1 (0.08-0.12) Limrock 48 (5-91) 172 (9-334) 0.27 (0.07-0.46) 0.47 (0.37-0.57) 0.06 (0.04-0.07) Tony Sinks 80 (28-131) 284 (85-483) 1.61 (0.9-2.32) 7.4 (5.36-9.44) 0.9 (0.63-1.11) 128
- Page 93 and 94: individuals, he predicted that it w
- Page 95 and 96: A phylogeographic study by Buhay &
- Page 97 and 98: differences in size structure among
- Page 99 and 100: and females in Tony Sinks Cave were
- Page 101 and 102: Estimates of life span for O. austr
- Page 103 and 104: available size-classes were well re
- Page 105 and 106: References Anonymous (1999) Cave Sc
- Page 107 and 108: Huryn A.D. & Wallace J.B. (1987) Pr
- Page 109 and 110: Whitmore N. & Huryn A.D. (1999) Lif
- Page 111 and 112: Table 2. Estimated life span (years
- Page 113 and 114: Figure 1. Annual growth increment (
- Page 115 and 116: Figure 3. Growth models for Orconec
- Page 117 and 118: CHAPTER 5 CONSUMER-RESOURCE DYNAMIC
- Page 119 and 120: following incidental inputs of orga
- Page 121 and 122: Temperature data were not available
- Page 123 and 124: minimum (Venarsky et al., 2012b). A
- Page 125 and 126: 100% organic matter (i.e., maximum
- Page 127 and 128: Macroinvertebrate biomass varied si
- Page 129 and 130: Discussion The energy-limitation hy
- Page 131 and 132: crayfish captured in most months we
- Page 133 and 134: systems is likely high, especially
- Page 135 and 136: function of microbial films in grou
- Page 137 and 138: Crustacean Biology, 4, 35-54. Momot
- Page 139 and 140: Whitmore N. & Huryn A. (1999) Life
- Page 141 and 142: Table 2. Assimilation efficiencies
- Page 143: Table 3. Continued Tanypodinae 0.03
- Page 147 and 148: Figure 1. (A) Box and whisker plot
- Page 149 and 150: CHAPTER 6 OVERALL CONCLUSIONS Due t
- Page 151 and 152: characteristics (e.g., higher growt
- Page 153 and 154: characteristics, highly efficient p
Table 5. Estimates <strong>of</strong> mean wood and leaf supply rates, macroinvertebrate production, and crayfish demand in Hering, Limrock, and<br />
Tony Sinks caves. All values are g ash free dry mass m -2 yr -1 . Numbers in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals.<br />
Crayfish demand Crayfish demand<br />
Cave Wood supply rate Leaf supply rate Macroinvertebrate production (organic matter) (macroinvertebrates)<br />
Hering 13 (7-19) 47 (22-73) 0.13 (0.05-0.21) 0.82 (0.63-1) 0.1 (0.08-0.12)<br />
Limrock 48 (5-91) 172 (9-334) 0.27 (0.07-0.46) 0.47 (0.37-0.57) 0.06 (0.04-0.07)<br />
Tony Sinks 80 (28-131) 284 (85-483) 1.61 (0.9-2.32) 7.4 (5.36-9.44) 0.9 (0.63-1.11)<br />
128