El Salvador - GFDRR
El Salvador - GFDRR
El Salvador - GFDRR
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
82 | <strong>El</strong> <strong>Salvador</strong>: Damage, Loss, and Needs Assesment<br />
There were no damages to power plants. In the electricity transmission system, landslides and erosion<br />
affected the bases of numerous transmission towers, one substation and one of ETESAL’s facilities. These<br />
will require work to avoid and mitigate disasters in the future. In the distribution networks, there were<br />
damages to the systems of DELSUR and AES; these were repaired quickly, using the equipment and supplies<br />
available in their workshops and warehouses.<br />
With regard to system operation and electricity distribution, the service was quickly and effectively<br />
reestablished in a relatively brief period, although in some isolated zones it took longer. This assumed<br />
higher operating costs and, due to the destruction of a relatively high number of houses and small- and<br />
medium-scale businesses, there has been a slight decrease in demand and sales of electricity which will<br />
only be recovered in the medium term, in line with these users’ reconstruction process.<br />
The heavy and unusual precipitation that occurred during the natural event made it possible to store<br />
significant volumes of water in the systems’ dams in the Lempa River basin. This allowed around 97.9<br />
gigawatts/hour of hydroelectricity to be generated between November of last year and May 2010, displacing<br />
the equivalent in thermal generation, with the consequent savings in generation which will be passed<br />
on to users.<br />
In summary, estimated damages totaled US$690,000, and the companies were obliged to spend unforeseen<br />
funds to rehabilitate supply and to avoid greater damages, in the amount of an extra US$2.13<br />
million, with the consequent negative effect on their expected financial results. Through the introduction<br />
of savings in power generation estimated at US$7.89 million, the sector shows a net benefit of US$5.76<br />
million resulting from greater generation in the hydroelectric plants (see Table 29).<br />
TABLE 29. ESTIMATED DAMAGES AND LOSSES IN THE ELECTRICITY SECTOR<br />
System Component<br />
Effects (in millions of US dollars)<br />
Property<br />
Damages Losses Total Public Private<br />
Generation system – – 7.89 – 7.89 – 7.89<br />
Higher hydropower generation – 7.89 – 7.89 – 7.89<br />
Transmission system – 1.32 1.32 1.32<br />
Mitigation costs: towers, substation and facility 1.32 1.32 1.32<br />
Distribution system 0.69 0.81 1.50 – 1.50<br />
Damages to distribution networks 0.69 0.69 0.69<br />
System rehabilitation costs – –<br />
Damage assessment cost – –<br />
Higher operating costs 0.06 0.06 0.06<br />
Fewer electricity sales 0.75 0.75 0.75<br />
Total 0.69 – 5.76 – 5.07 – 6.57 1.50<br />
Source: Estimates by assessment mission based on information from SIGET and companies.<br />
B.3.3 Transportation Sector<br />
The damages and losses caused by the disaster had an especially severe effect on bridges, causing some<br />
to collapse and significant damages to other structures. Landslides caused costs and obstructions to<br />
pavement. Fortunately, the damages are less than those that occurred on similar occasions: for example,<br />
during Hurricanes Mitch in 1998 and Stan in 2005, and the 2001 earthquakes.