16.11.2013 Views

El Salvador - GFDRR

El Salvador - GFDRR

El Salvador - GFDRR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

82 | <strong>El</strong> <strong>Salvador</strong>: Damage, Loss, and Needs Assesment<br />

There were no damages to power plants. In the electricity transmission system, landslides and erosion<br />

affected the bases of numerous transmission towers, one substation and one of ETESAL’s facilities. These<br />

will require work to avoid and mitigate disasters in the future. In the distribution networks, there were<br />

damages to the systems of DELSUR and AES; these were repaired quickly, using the equipment and supplies<br />

available in their workshops and warehouses.<br />

With regard to system operation and electricity distribution, the service was quickly and effectively<br />

reestablished in a relatively brief period, although in some isolated zones it took longer. This assumed<br />

higher operating costs and, due to the destruction of a relatively high number of houses and small- and<br />

medium-scale businesses, there has been a slight decrease in demand and sales of electricity which will<br />

only be recovered in the medium term, in line with these users’ reconstruction process.<br />

The heavy and unusual precipitation that occurred during the natural event made it possible to store<br />

significant volumes of water in the systems’ dams in the Lempa River basin. This allowed around 97.9<br />

gigawatts/hour of hydroelectricity to be generated between November of last year and May 2010, displacing<br />

the equivalent in thermal generation, with the consequent savings in generation which will be passed<br />

on to users.<br />

In summary, estimated damages totaled US$690,000, and the companies were obliged to spend unforeseen<br />

funds to rehabilitate supply and to avoid greater damages, in the amount of an extra US$2.13<br />

million, with the consequent negative effect on their expected financial results. Through the introduction<br />

of savings in power generation estimated at US$7.89 million, the sector shows a net benefit of US$5.76<br />

million resulting from greater generation in the hydroelectric plants (see Table 29).<br />

TABLE 29. ESTIMATED DAMAGES AND LOSSES IN THE ELECTRICITY SECTOR<br />

System Component<br />

Effects (in millions of US dollars)<br />

Property<br />

Damages Losses Total Public Private<br />

Generation system – – 7.89 – 7.89 – 7.89<br />

Higher hydropower generation – 7.89 – 7.89 – 7.89<br />

Transmission system – 1.32 1.32 1.32<br />

Mitigation costs: towers, substation and facility 1.32 1.32 1.32<br />

Distribution system 0.69 0.81 1.50 – 1.50<br />

Damages to distribution networks 0.69 0.69 0.69<br />

System rehabilitation costs – –<br />

Damage assessment cost – –<br />

Higher operating costs 0.06 0.06 0.06<br />

Fewer electricity sales 0.75 0.75 0.75<br />

Total 0.69 – 5.76 – 5.07 – 6.57 1.50<br />

Source: Estimates by assessment mission based on information from SIGET and companies.<br />

B.3.3 Transportation Sector<br />

The damages and losses caused by the disaster had an especially severe effect on bridges, causing some<br />

to collapse and significant damages to other structures. Landslides caused costs and obstructions to<br />

pavement. Fortunately, the damages are less than those that occurred on similar occasions: for example,<br />

during Hurricanes Mitch in 1998 and Stan in 2005, and the 2001 earthquakes.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!