16.11.2013 Views

El Salvador - GFDRR

El Salvador - GFDRR

El Salvador - GFDRR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

12 | <strong>El</strong> <strong>Salvador</strong>: Damage, Loss, and Needs Assesment<br />

2. Triggers<br />

The main triggers of landslides were the rains that took place from November 7 to 8. The rain had two severe<br />

consequences: an increase in water flow in natural drainage channels on the lower slopes of the San<br />

Vicente (Chinchontepec) volcano, and an increase in the pressure of water runoff on deposits of loosely<br />

compacted materials and on bedrock.<br />

Due to the wind from the north that accompanied the precipitation, the slopes facing this direction<br />

experienced rain gusts that generated major environmental humidity which cooled when it encountered<br />

an obstacle. The increased runoff resulted in erosion on the floor of river channels and on riverbanks.<br />

Cuts on steeper slopes destabilized adjacent slopes and caused an increase in the materials that<br />

flowed toward streams. The slope also gave rise to the accumulation of runoff pressure which reduced<br />

the slope’s stability. When a large part of the slope totally collapsed, river streams were blocked and the<br />

rupture of these obstructions, due to pressure, caused the lahars. All of these processes caused a flow of<br />

water with a high concentration of sediments. When the discharge of this mixture exceeds a critical value,<br />

the flow becomes a lahar. Under these circumstances, the mass does not behave according to classic laws<br />

of hydraulics and what scientists call “non-Newtonian flows” occur, since the ratio of water to solids is<br />

less than 1 and sometimes reaches values of 0.50 or even less. Next, sedimentation of materials occurs<br />

when the lahars reach less steep slopes, at the foot of the volcano, clogging channels and reducing the<br />

rivers’ carrying capacity (drainage or load). This caused new river courses to open, the most notable case<br />

being that of Verapaz. Another element in this process is the pulsating character of the flow: the frontal<br />

part of the lahar contains thicker materials that reduce its speed, causing dams which, when they break<br />

up, make a new acceleration possible. Eyewitnesses in Verapaz observed several surges prior to the main<br />

landslide that devastated the city.<br />

Smaller lahars continued along the channels of rivers without entering towns, although the volumes<br />

of materials filled these channels and caused them to overflow in several directions, affecting nearby lands<br />

and vast populated zones. Measurements by D-SNET and MARN make it possible to estimate the magnitude<br />

of the principal lahars that surged from the San Vicente volcano.<br />

Stream<br />

(population affected)<br />

TABLE 3. CHARACTERISTICS OF LAHARS ON SAN VICENTE VOLCANO<br />

Sedimentation area<br />

Thickness of<br />

sedimentation<br />

Volume of<br />

sedimentation<br />

Runoff distance<br />

<strong>El</strong> Derrumbo (Guadalupe) 250,000 m 2 0.5 – 2.5 m 360,000 m 3 6 km<br />

La Quebradona (Verapaz) 150,000 m 2 0.5 – 2.0 m 250,000 m 3 6 km<br />

<strong>El</strong> Amate Blanco (Tepetitán) 250,000 m 2 0.5 – 2.0 m 300,000 m 3 6 km<br />

Source: D-SNET/MARN.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!