El Salvador - GFDRR
El Salvador - GFDRR
El Salvador - GFDRR
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
12 | <strong>El</strong> <strong>Salvador</strong>: Damage, Loss, and Needs Assesment<br />
2. Triggers<br />
The main triggers of landslides were the rains that took place from November 7 to 8. The rain had two severe<br />
consequences: an increase in water flow in natural drainage channels on the lower slopes of the San<br />
Vicente (Chinchontepec) volcano, and an increase in the pressure of water runoff on deposits of loosely<br />
compacted materials and on bedrock.<br />
Due to the wind from the north that accompanied the precipitation, the slopes facing this direction<br />
experienced rain gusts that generated major environmental humidity which cooled when it encountered<br />
an obstacle. The increased runoff resulted in erosion on the floor of river channels and on riverbanks.<br />
Cuts on steeper slopes destabilized adjacent slopes and caused an increase in the materials that<br />
flowed toward streams. The slope also gave rise to the accumulation of runoff pressure which reduced<br />
the slope’s stability. When a large part of the slope totally collapsed, river streams were blocked and the<br />
rupture of these obstructions, due to pressure, caused the lahars. All of these processes caused a flow of<br />
water with a high concentration of sediments. When the discharge of this mixture exceeds a critical value,<br />
the flow becomes a lahar. Under these circumstances, the mass does not behave according to classic laws<br />
of hydraulics and what scientists call “non-Newtonian flows” occur, since the ratio of water to solids is<br />
less than 1 and sometimes reaches values of 0.50 or even less. Next, sedimentation of materials occurs<br />
when the lahars reach less steep slopes, at the foot of the volcano, clogging channels and reducing the<br />
rivers’ carrying capacity (drainage or load). This caused new river courses to open, the most notable case<br />
being that of Verapaz. Another element in this process is the pulsating character of the flow: the frontal<br />
part of the lahar contains thicker materials that reduce its speed, causing dams which, when they break<br />
up, make a new acceleration possible. Eyewitnesses in Verapaz observed several surges prior to the main<br />
landslide that devastated the city.<br />
Smaller lahars continued along the channels of rivers without entering towns, although the volumes<br />
of materials filled these channels and caused them to overflow in several directions, affecting nearby lands<br />
and vast populated zones. Measurements by D-SNET and MARN make it possible to estimate the magnitude<br />
of the principal lahars that surged from the San Vicente volcano.<br />
Stream<br />
(population affected)<br />
TABLE 3. CHARACTERISTICS OF LAHARS ON SAN VICENTE VOLCANO<br />
Sedimentation area<br />
Thickness of<br />
sedimentation<br />
Volume of<br />
sedimentation<br />
Runoff distance<br />
<strong>El</strong> Derrumbo (Guadalupe) 250,000 m 2 0.5 – 2.5 m 360,000 m 3 6 km<br />
La Quebradona (Verapaz) 150,000 m 2 0.5 – 2.0 m 250,000 m 3 6 km<br />
<strong>El</strong> Amate Blanco (Tepetitán) 250,000 m 2 0.5 – 2.0 m 300,000 m 3 6 km<br />
Source: D-SNET/MARN.