El Salvador - GFDRR
El Salvador - GFDRR
El Salvador - GFDRR
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4 | <strong>El</strong> <strong>Salvador</strong>: Damage, Loss, and Needs Assesment<br />
On the basis of families that lost their homes or were displaced from them in the emergency, and taking<br />
into account the income losses that occurred as a consequence of the disaster, it has been estimated<br />
that the population affected in a primary and secondary manner totals just over 122,000.<br />
Based on the use of the disaster assessment methodology developed by CEPAL since 1972, it has been<br />
estimated that, besides suffering the regrettable loss of human lives, the value of damages and losses caused<br />
by the November 2009 disaster in <strong>El</strong> <strong>Salvador</strong> totals US$314.8 million, which represent the equivalent of<br />
1.44% of the country’s gross domestic product (GDP). Of the entire economic effect, US$210.7 million correspond<br />
to the destruction of assets (66.9% of total damages and losses), while the remaining US$104.1<br />
million represent changes in economic flows and include both production losses and higher service costs<br />
(33.1% of the total). Of the total amount of damages and losses, 63.3% (US$199.3 million) refers to<br />
public property, while 36.7% (US$115.5 million) refers to private property (see Chapter II, Table 7), a ratio<br />
that illustrates the relative effort that each of these sectors will have to make in recovery activities.<br />
The magnitude of the disaster at national level is limited. However, when geographically more disaggregated<br />
values are examined, the tragedy caused by this event can be better visualized. It is worth noting<br />
that the impact of the disaster was concentrated in 5 of the country’s 14 departments, accounting for<br />
nearly 85% of damages and losses. There is an inverse relationship between the higher value of damages<br />
and losses per person, and the relationship between these effects and the GDP, with regard to the current<br />
year’s Human Development Index (HDI). This implies damages and losses to the livelihoods of segments of<br />
the population with high levels of economic and social vulnerability. These have been concentrated on the<br />
population that suffered the partial or total loss of their homes and assets.<br />
Different types of needs with a different degree of urgency and duration are drawn from this impact<br />
profile. With information on the quantification of damages and losses, and information on the requirements<br />
expressed by the various sectors consulted, a table of recovery and reconstruction needs has been<br />
prepared, detailing by principal sectors the amounts needed for each type of intervention. In summary, the<br />
amount needed for recovery is estimated at US$105.9 million, which would be used between December<br />
2009 and June 2010, before the next rainy season starts in the country, while the total amount needed<br />
for reconstruction is estimated at US$149 million, to be used between the end of 2009 and 2014 (see<br />
Chapter VI, Table 47). Added to these are immediate needs for early recovery and, in the short and long<br />
terms, for undertaking substantial risk reduction efforts.<br />
The country needs to adopt an explicit risk reduction strategy in view of the recurrence of this type of<br />
phenomena and historical experience. Moreover, this event presents an opportunity to make significant<br />
changes in the pattern of spatial development and the development of economic and social sectors which<br />
must be given greater attention due to their potential and their vulnerability.<br />
In effect, a strategic framework of risk management is recommended, combining specific elements<br />
found in <strong>El</strong> <strong>Salvador</strong> and lessons learned from international experience. The principles that underlie this<br />
framework are: (i) human loss and the economic impact of disasters may be reduced through pre-disaster<br />
planning and investments in prevention; and (ii) the strategic framework and the action plan are effective<br />
in terms of cost and implementation. The pillars of the Risk Management Framework and their description<br />
are presented in Chapter V.