El Salvador - GFDRR
El Salvador - GFDRR
El Salvador - GFDRR
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
| 101<br />
IV. ECONOMIC IMPACT<br />
A. IMPACT OF TROPICAL STORM IDA AND THE TROPICAL DEPRESSION<br />
This chapter describes the analysis conducted on the impact that the damages and losses caused by the<br />
disaster will have on large macroeconomic aggregates and on the employment and personal income of<br />
those affected.<br />
Overall Impact of Damages and Losses<br />
The overall impact of damages and losses was estimated on the basis of the sectoral assessment presented<br />
in the previous chapter. An analysis was conducted of the economy’s overall performance before and after<br />
the path of Hurricane Ida.<br />
The total effects of the hurricane, although significant in social terms and considerable at departmental<br />
level, did not reach levels significant enough to substantially alter compliance with the macroeconomic<br />
targets stated by <strong>El</strong> <strong>Salvador</strong>’s economic authorities.<br />
The following is a brief overview of economic activity in the 2001–2008 period and in 2009, prior<br />
to the disaster; it then contrasts the expected post-disaster economic situation for 2009 and 2010. This<br />
background information is used to address the economic forecast following the disaster (the gap between<br />
performance with and without the disaster).<br />
a) Pre-disaster Situation: Recent Macroeconomic Performance, 2001–2008<br />
Principal trends. In the past eight years, the <strong>Salvador</strong>an economy experienced a moderate, steady growth,<br />
equivalent to an average of 3%, with an annual inflation rate of 4% (see Table 42).<br />
Economic activity showed rising growth rates from 2005 to 2007, mainly driven by the flow of remittances<br />
that the country received, equivalent to 17.6% of the GDP. These turned into an important source<br />
of financing for consumption and investment in an environment of abundant liquidity and low interest<br />
rates. In addition, the contribution of the external sector, especially since 2003, was increasingly negative<br />
because imports grew steadily while exports have remained relatively constant.