16.11.2013 Views

El Salvador - GFDRR

El Salvador - GFDRR

El Salvador - GFDRR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

III. CROSS-CUTTING ISSUES | 93<br />

Other zones affected by landslides. During the aerial reconnaissance flights, a large number of landslides<br />

were observed in the areas of the towns of Paraíso de Osorio, San Emigdio, Santa Cruz Analquito,<br />

San Ramón and Candelaria, all located east of Lake Ilopango. Most of the landslides were not large or<br />

thick, but together they had a considerable effect while also increasing the level of risk to which the<br />

nearby communities have been exposed. Another zone impacted by landslides was to the north of Lake<br />

Ilopango, where towns such as San Agustín and nearby areas are located.<br />

Damages and losses<br />

The cost of removing the estimated volume of debris (1.2 million m 3 ) exceeds US$12 million. Damages<br />

to infrastructure within the protected areas were estimated at US$62,000, while a preliminary estimate<br />

of losses to ecosystems totals US$1.8 million. The effects on the environment not only include the<br />

accumulation of debris but also the loss of soils that were suitable for agricultural, livestock and forestry<br />

activities; and the silting of rivers and creeks, with the consequent increase in the risk of future floods<br />

due to the loss of natural drainage. The effects on water quality and on aquatic biota, among others,<br />

should be evaluated. Because a detailed analysis of damages and losses to environmental services could<br />

not be conducted for this analysis, it is recommended that a more in-depth assessment be conducted to<br />

help the country determine the real cost of environmental damage. However, additional data provided by<br />

government authorities after the conclusion of the preliminary damage and loss assessment indicate that<br />

environmental damages caused by the event total US$46.06 million, with total damages of US$60.07<br />

million.<br />

It is evident that some communities and small cities have remained at a higher level of exposure to<br />

risks. It is important that risk prevention and mitigation measures as well as environmental protection<br />

measures use a broad perspective, such as a watershed or landscape approach, to make it possible to better<br />

integrate environmental complexity and the interfaces between manmade and natural environments.<br />

a) Damages and Losses to Livelihoods<br />

Because the livelihoods of the population are home based, damages to homes have been used as a<br />

starting point to measure damages and losses in the sector.<br />

According to Civil Protection reports, the evaluated housing damages totaled 1,054 completely destroyed<br />

houses and 2,005 with partial damages, of which 1,200 are considered to have household economic<br />

activity in 5 departments and 59 municipalities (see Housing Sector report).<br />

Damages and losses to livelihoods have been concentrated on completely destroyed houses; these<br />

have been the subject of the present assessment.<br />

As shown in the table, total damages and losses are calculated at nearly US$3 million and include the<br />

sectors of commerce, backyard animal raising, production of foods made from corn cooked in lime-water<br />

(hominy) and the provision of services, all home based.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!