16.11.2013 Views

Patient Safety Strategy - Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Trust

Patient Safety Strategy - Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Trust

Patient Safety Strategy - Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Trust

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GLOUCESTERSHIRE HOSPITALS <strong>NHS</strong> FOUNDATION TRUST<br />

PATIENT SAFETY STRATEGY<br />

ANNEX A<br />

1. <strong>Gloucestershire</strong> <strong>Hospitals</strong> has a key strategic objective – to maximise patient safety.<br />

Promoting safety will save lives and reduce avoidable harm, the challenge for the <strong>Trust</strong><br />

is to get everyone to believe that it will and to support and engage clinical staff in<br />

activities that take this forward and grow a safety culture.<br />

2. <strong>Patient</strong> safety findings across the UK indicate that around 10% of patients experience<br />

an adverse event during an acute admission. The overwhelming majority result in no<br />

harm, however, around 50% are believed to be avoidable. This also indicates that<br />

there are areas of care that are both ineffective and inefficient and lead to<br />

unsatisfactory patient experiences.<br />

3. Across the world in countries such as America, Canada, Japan, Denmark, Australia<br />

and several European countries, direct action to reduce levels of avoidable mortality<br />

has been initiated. Campaigns such as the “Saving lives” campaign have<br />

demonstrated that any hospital can reduce its mortality rates by taking specific action<br />

in key areas.<br />

4. The English campaign “<strong>Safety</strong> First” was launched in 2008 with a focus on reducing<br />

avoidable adverse events through key programmes of improvement. The campaign<br />

builds on initiatives developed by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) where<br />

the evidence base has been scrutinised and measurements demonstrating improving<br />

safety have been developed.<br />

5. To meet the <strong>Trust</strong>’s objective, to maximise patient safety, a safety programme will be<br />

established reflecting national and international experience and building on the<br />

progress of the past year and the Leadership in <strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> programme.<br />

6. Providing quality of care and safety will also lead to cost–effective care by<br />

systematically reducing avoidable adverse events which result in extended hospital<br />

stays and readmissions. The <strong>Trust</strong> must strive to be the best at providing quality of<br />

care and safety which is both effective and efficient and provides patients with a<br />

positive experience.<br />

Culture, Values and Performance<br />

7. To provide the right environment for a safety strategy it is important to foster and<br />

support a just culture where staff are treated consistently and fairly at all levels. This<br />

means that the <strong>Trust</strong> Board, managers and clinicians openly support staff and see any<br />

adverse event and near miss, as an opportunity to learn and improve. A healthy<br />

organisation “really” believes that it is better to invest its time and energy in<br />

systematically learning from the 99% of incidents that don’t require any formal<br />

disciplinary action rather than the 1% that might.<br />

8. Consistently across the world, evidence shows that patients who have suffered<br />

adverse events want an apology and reassurance that it won’t happen again. To<br />

achieve this it must be the normal response to engage patients and their relatives in<br />

investigations of all types and provide thoughtful and honest feedback.<br />

9. A safety culture must be supported by visual safety leadership through executive<br />

walkabouts and safety campaign leads, who, will engage front line staff and identify<br />

champions to develop solutions. Individual initiatives will have the support of a<br />

programme lead, and local clinical champions.<br />

10. This process must be supported by good clinical measurement (metrics). These<br />

metrics will be derived from the individual safety programmes and linked with the<br />

performance framework of the <strong>Trust</strong>. The emphasis will be to provide initial<br />

benchmarking, monitoring and assurance of performance throughout the <strong>Trust</strong>. Metrics<br />

will be aligned with the PCT contract and other external monitoring needs. This<br />

<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> - Annex A Page 1 of 8<br />

Main Board, July 2009


information management process must be supported by effective data collection and<br />

robust organisational information arrangements.<br />

11. To deliver the safety agenda a comprehensive range of coaching and training must be<br />

delivered, underpinned by an inclusive safety management system that is integrated<br />

into the everyday work of all staff.<br />

12. <strong>Patient</strong> involvement will be integrated into the work of all programmes so that<br />

improvement of safety includes the patients interpretation of what is important and<br />

improves the patient journey and experience within the <strong>Trust</strong>.<br />

<strong>Trust</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> Aims<br />

13. The <strong>Trust</strong> will reduce adverse events by developing a comprehensive range of safety<br />

initiatives (see below) visibly supported by the Board, with the right culture, ownership<br />

and safety management systems.<br />

14. The Director of <strong>Safety</strong> will coordinate a safety campaign to engage clinical staff and<br />

patients and to promote good practice and celebrate success.<br />

15. The <strong>Trust</strong> aims will be to:<br />

Reduce the number of patients who suffer avoidable harm<br />

Grow a just safety culture<br />

16. To demonstrate the long term success of the programme the <strong>Trust</strong> will develop the<br />

following high level indicators. The <strong>Trust</strong> will also track the Hospital Standardised<br />

Mortality ratio as a proxy indicator for the reduction of mortality.<br />

17. The Global Trigger Tool for Measuring Adverse Events provides an easy-to-use<br />

method for accurately identifying adverse events and measuring the rate of adverse<br />

events over time. Tracking adverse events over time is a useful way to tell if changes<br />

being made are improving the safety of the care processes. The Trigger Tool<br />

methodology includes a retrospective review of a random sample of patient records<br />

using “triggers” (or clues) to identify possible adverse events.<br />

The success criteria will be a reduction of adverse events by 30% in three years<br />

against the current rate.<br />

18. To improve the ownership and culture of the organisation, the Director of <strong>Safety</strong> will<br />

establish a programme of safety walkabouts with the executive team. Completion of<br />

the walkabout programme and actions taken on the messages and issues received<br />

from the workplace will be reported and monitored through to the Quality Committee.<br />

18.1. The success criteria for this objective will be to complete 85 walkabouts a year<br />

and to complete 70% of the actions agreed.<br />

18.2. To improve the fairness and effectiveness rating for incidents reporting as<br />

measured by the annual staff survey year on year.<br />

Key Responsibility<br />

19. The <strong>Trust</strong> Board should set the direction for effective patient safety systems which<br />

should be an integral part of the organisation’s culture, of its values and performance<br />

standards. All Board members should take the lead in ensuring the communication of<br />

<strong>Safety</strong> programmes and benefits.<br />

20. The Chief Executive is the Accounting Officer for <strong>Gloucestershire</strong> <strong>Hospitals</strong> <strong>NHS</strong><br />

Foundation <strong>Trust</strong>. He is accountable for ensuring that the <strong>Trust</strong> can discharge its legal<br />

duty for all aspects of safety each year, and for the health & safety of staff, visitors and<br />

contractors in the <strong>Trust</strong>.<br />

21. A Non-executive Director must be identified and be assured that patient safety is<br />

being addressed; the NED lead will act as a scrutinizer – ensuring the processes to<br />

support and assure the Board facing significant patient safety risks are robust.<br />

<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> - Annex A Page 2 of 8<br />

Main Board, July 2009


22. The Medical Director and Director of Nursing, in partnership with the Director of<br />

<strong>Safety</strong> will ensure organisational arrangements are in place for continuous monitoring<br />

and safety improvements for patients.<br />

23. Executive and Divisional Directors are accountable for the safety activities in their<br />

areas of responsibility; their organisational structure must be able to discharge the<br />

requirements of patient safety.<br />

24. The Director of <strong>Safety</strong> has a particular responsibility for leading the <strong>Safety</strong><br />

programmes and risk management for both clinical and non clinical (health and<br />

safety). He manages the risk teams which liaise closely with the Divisional teams to<br />

support their activities. He will support and monitor the safety programmes and ensure<br />

they are functioning and provide reports on the appropriate metrics.<br />

25. All staff and managers are responsible for safety within their immediate environment<br />

and for participating in wider governance, quality & risk management issues within<br />

their department. In addition, all staff should have clear objectives set and documented<br />

as part of their annual performance reviews.<br />

<strong>Safety</strong> Programme<br />

26. The <strong>Trust</strong> is partnering with the SHA and Health Foundation to establish and support a<br />

safety programme. The programme will have five main streams:<br />

Leadership Dr Frank Harsent Chief Executive<br />

General Ward Mrs Maggie Arnold Director of Nursing<br />

Critical care Dr Sally Pearson Director of Planning<br />

Medicines Management Dr Sean Elyan Medical Director<br />

Peri-operative Care. Ms Evelyn Barker Director of Service<br />

Delivery<br />

27. Each stream has an executive lead (see above), and will appoint a systems lead<br />

(champions) and a day-to-day manager. The initiatives will be bench marked (self<br />

assessed) with the support of the SHA and Health Foundation and a safety<br />

programme established. Where possible the initiatives will be aligned with the PCT<br />

requirements. (CQUIN) The metrics from these programmes will form part of the long<br />

term assurance of the <strong>Trust</strong>s safety.<br />

28. The programmes will form the basis of Divisional safety plans for quality and the<br />

Quality accounts, infection control will be embedded within each programme.<br />

29. The successful techniques and processes each year will form part of a database of<br />

safety initiatives, so that in the following year clinical areas can adopt the practice on a<br />

rolling programme of improvement. This information will be fed into the local annual<br />

planning systems that contribute towards the Divisions annual plan.<br />

30. Each initiative will establish a project plan and metrics to monitor and measure<br />

improvements. The programmes will be regularly monitored by the Divisions quality<br />

arrangements and shared with either the <strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> Forum or the Health & <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Committee and assurance will provided to the Quality Committee through the Quality<br />

reports. Key operational concerns will be reported to <strong>Trust</strong> Management Team<br />

meeting and overall performance to <strong>Trust</strong> Board.<br />

Meeting National <strong>Safety</strong> Standards<br />

31. In parallel to the safety programmes, the <strong>Trust</strong> will also aim to meet all relevant<br />

national standards. This will demonstrated by aiming for <strong>NHS</strong>LA level 3 for General<br />

and Maternity Standards over the next 3-5 years. To effectively implement all safety<br />

solutions recommended by the National <strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> Agency and the wider Safer<br />

Alert Bulletins, and each year demonstrably build on the Healthcare Commission<br />

standards relevant to safety.<br />

<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> - Annex A Page 3 of 8<br />

Main Board, July 2009


Summary<br />

32. The <strong>Trust</strong> will aim to become the best at reducing unnecessary harm to patients with a<br />

comprehensive safety programme led by the Board, with an open and learning culture,<br />

engaging front line staff and patients to develop solutions supported by effective<br />

information management.<br />

Andrew Seaton<br />

May 2009<br />

<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> - Annex A Page 4 of 8<br />

Main Board, July 2009


Appendix 1<br />

Nationally agreed <strong>Safety</strong> Measures<br />

Critical care<br />

The recommended measures are:<br />

Ventilator bundle compliance<br />

Days between Ventilator associated pneumonias (VAP)<br />

Central Line bundle compliance<br />

Days between central line infections (CLI)<br />

Additional measures are:<br />

VAP rate per 1,000 ventilator days<br />

CLI rate per 1,000 central line days<br />

Ventilator length of stay<br />

Length of stay in ICU<br />

These measures are in use with the 1000 Lives campaign in Wales and also used by the Safer <strong>Patient</strong>s Initiative.<br />

Peri-operative care<br />

The recommended measures are:<br />

SSI rate 30 days post operation<br />

SSI bundle compliance<br />

% antibiotics administered on time<br />

% antibiotics discontinued on time<br />

% surgery with appropriate hair removal<br />

% of surgical patients with perioperative normothermia<br />

% diabetics with controlled glucose<br />

% patients with appropriate hair removal<br />

% compliance with use of the WHO Surgical <strong>Safety</strong> Checklist<br />

Some of these measures are in use with the 1000 Lives campaign in Wales and also used by the Safer <strong>Patient</strong>s Initiative.<br />

Deterioration<br />

The recommended measures are:<br />

<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> - Annex A Page 5 of 8<br />

Main Board, July 2009


The number of cardiac arrests per month<br />

The number of Rapid Response calls per month<br />

The percentage of Rapid Response team communications performed with your chosen communication tool. We have created measures<br />

for SBAR and RSVP, simply select the one you are using. If you use another tool, you will need to create a custom measure. Please<br />

contact the campaign team for further guidance on how to do this.<br />

If you want more information on where your process for dealing with deteriorating patients is working or not working, you might like to<br />

consider the following process measures:<br />

The percentage of patient observations complete<br />

The percentage of patients who triggered that had an appropriate reaction<br />

These can both be picked up while doing the GTT audit. We also strongly recommend performing a mortality case note review to get a<br />

handle on the issues surrounding unexpected death.<br />

High risk medicines<br />

The campaign is focusing on 4 drugs or drug groups: Anticoagulants, Opiates, Insulin and anaesthetic sedatives. Ideally we would want to<br />

measure compliance with treatment protocol (a process measure) and adverse drug events related to these drugs (an outcome measure).<br />

However these are extremely labour intensive to collect and so we recommend a series of proxy outcome measures as follows because<br />

they are more straightforward to collect:<br />

% of inpatient warfarin doses administered according to protocol *<br />

Number of patients receiving Warfarin with INR >6<br />

Number of patients receiving Warfarin with INR >5 *<br />

Number of patients receiving Warfarin with INR >8 *<br />

% of patients receiving low molecular weight heparin outside protocol limits *<br />

Number of patients receiving flumazenil to counteract effects of midazolam *<br />

% of patients with no INR recorded on inpatient warfarin prescription *<br />

Additional measures<br />

There are additional measures contained in the How To Guide that participants may want to use to assess compliance with protocols and<br />

measure real outcomes. They are:<br />

The number of patients who received opiates who receive subsequent treatment with naloxone *<br />

Number of patients who received 25%/ 50% glucose to correct insulin induced hypoglycaemia<br />

Reported anticoagulant adverse event rate *<br />

Adverse event rate associated with use of low molecular weight heparin and unfractionated heparin<br />

Injectable sedative adverse event rate *<br />

<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> - Annex A Page 6 of 8<br />

Main Board, July 2009


% of patients treated within opiate protocol *<br />

Opiate adverse event rate *<br />

Insulin adverse event rate *<br />

* These measures are in use with the 1000 Lives campaign in Wales.<br />

There are 4 other interventions VTE, falls, surviving sepsis bundle, and peripheral lines that are under development.<br />

<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> - Annex A Page 7 of 8<br />

Main Board, July 2009


Appendix 2<br />

Ward\Department<br />

Involved<br />

<strong>Safety</strong><br />

Project<br />

<strong>Safety</strong><br />

Theme<br />

i.e. Wards<br />

Clinical<br />

Champion<br />

Target<br />

Metric(s)<br />

<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> - Annex A Page 8 of 8<br />

Main Board, July 2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!