gilbert redevelopment commission agenda ... - Town of Gilbert

GILBERT REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION 

AGENDA 

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 16, 2013 

Marc Barlow, Chairman Mary Ellen Fresquez Ryan Hamilton 

James Torgeson, Vice Chairman 

Thomas McNally 

Gilbert Municipal Center 

Council Chambers 

50 East Civic Center Drive REGULAR MEETING 

Gilbert Arizona 

6:30 P.M. 

EST. AGENDA ITEM 

TIME 

6:30 p.m. CALL TO ORDER of the Regular meeting 

ROLL CALL 

COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITIZENS 

At this time, members of the public may comment on matters not on 

the agenda. The Commission’s response is limited to responding to 

criticism, asking staff to review a matter commented upon, or asking 

that a matter be put on a future agenda. 

ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS 

1. Update on Data Driven Approaches to Crime and Traffic Safety 

(DDACTS) Statistics –Commander Ken Buckland 

2. ASU Master of Real Estate Development (MRED) Program – 

Review one year program for students to analyze the development 

potential of Town owned land in the Heritage District – Mark 

Stapp, ASU MRED Program 

3. Gilbert Leadership Class 21 Project – Proposal to paint a mural on 

the south wall of the American Legion Post 39 building – Alan 

Fitzgerald, Gilbert Leadership class member 

4. Entertainment District – Discuss purpose and criteria to designate 

an Entertainment District within the Heritage District – Linda 

Edwards 

5. Minutes – Consider approval of minutes for the regular meeting of 

December 19, 2012 

6. Committee Updates: 

a. HRCAP Board and Art Subcommittee Report – Update by 

Chairman Barlow 

b. Event Committee – Update by Commissioner McNally 

c. Gilbert Historical Society - Commissioner Fresquez 

COMMISSION 

ACTION 

Discussion 

Discussion 

Discussion 

Discussion, Possible Action 

by MOTION 

Discussion, Possible Action 

by MOTION 

Discussion 

7. Update on Projects in the Heritage District – Linda Edwards Discussion

COMMUNICATIONS 

8. Report from CHAIR on current or future events 

9. Report from COUNCIL LIAISON on current or future events 

10. Report from COMMISSIONERS on current or future events 

11. Report from INTERIM PLANNING MANAGER on current or 

future events 

ADJOURN 

MOTION to adjourn

Redevelopment 

Commission 

COMMUNICATION 

Agenda 

Item 

#1 

TO: 

FROM: 

THROUGH: 

REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MEMBERS 

Linda M. Edwards, AICP, Interim Planning Services Manager 

Redevelopment Commission Staff Liaison 

480-503-6750 or linda.edwards@gilbertaz.gov 

Kyle Mieras, AICP, Interim Deputy Development Services Director 

DATE: January 16, 2013 

SUBJECT: 

Data Driven Approaches to Crime and Traffic Safety (DDACTS) 

RECOMMENDED MOTION 

A motion is not required. 

BACKGROUND 

Commander Ken Buckland will provide the Redevelopment Commission with some 

statistical updates on the incidence of crimes and collision in Gilbert, along with: 

• A summary of 8 months of work 

• Success in meeting the goals with focus groups 

• Overall impact in the area. 

• Success stories 

A motion is not required. 

STAFF RECOMMENDATION 

Respectfully submitted, 

Linda M. Edwards, AICP 

Interim Planning Services Manager

Redevelopment Commission 

COMMUNICATION 

Agenda 

Item 

#2 

TO: 

FROM: 


Daniel C. Henderson, CEcD Economic Development Director 


SUBJECT: 

ASU MRED Program of Work in the Heritage District 


The information presented is designed to provide the Gilbert Redevelopment Commission with an 

update and overview of the partnership between the Town and the Arizona State University Master of 

Real Estate Development (MRED) program. 

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION 

Mark Stapp, Executive Director for the Arizona State University Master of Real Estate 

Development (MRED) program will present to the Gilbert Redevelopment Commission an 

overview of the MRED program and the current Synthesis project taking place in Gilbert. The 

ASU MRED program offers a transdisciplinary approach to real estate development education 

through a full-immersion curriculum that explores the development process in its entirety. During 

the one-year program, the Program Teams locate, analyze and consider the physical, legal, 

economic, political and financial conditions impacting the user/developer of property and the 

critical market and financial analysis required for a successful project 

Through this program, the Program Teams take part in 3 group-based synthesis projects which 

utilize actual locations and variable development situations in order to assess opportunities and 

present development solutions. Upon completion, projects are presented to the MRED faculty as 

well as a panel of industry leaders. Teams are balanced to include members of varying 

experiences in order to maximize the internal learning experience and mimic the actual 

development process. 

This year the ASU MRED program has selected the Heritage District in Gilbert to participate in 2 

of the 3 synthesis projects. Teams will be required to assess and present solutions for various 

parcels of vacant land owned by Gilbert located within the Heritage District. 

Each ASU MRED Team’s objective is to: 

1. Determine if the current zoning in Gilbert supports development compatible with current and 

future market demands and if not, what zoning changes will be required and what is the 

strategy and cost of requesting the proposed changes. 

2. With Masters of Urban Design students (MUD), prepare concept plan(s) that define the Gilbert 

Heritage District and maximize each Parcel’s value.

3. Make a specific offer to Gilbert to become the Master Developer including: 

a. Respondent’s overall vision for the District 

b. Anticipated primary uses and markets for the District 

c. Proposed financing types and sources 

d. Development phasing 

e. Proposed involvement of the Town and other stakeholders. 

4. Based on the Master Development Plan, prepare a financial analysis to determine how much 

can be paid for each Parcel and the Parcels in aggregate, given defined investment criteria, 

assumptions, terms and conditions. 

5. Prepare for Gilbert a bound analysis (“Project Report”), including the description of strategic 

investment and development alternatives. 

6. With the MUD students, make a presentation of the Master Developer proposal to Gilbert. 

Through the coordinated efforts of the Arizona State University, the ASU MRED program and 

Gilbert, Arizona the continued redevelopment of the Heritage District will be a major contributing 

factor in Gilbert’s continuing quest to be a Community of Excellence. 


The information presented is designed to provide the Gilbert Redevelopment Commission with an 

update and overview of the partnership between the Town and the Arizona State University 

Master of Real Estate Development (MRED) program. Therefore, no recommendation is 

required. 


Daniel C. Henderson, CEcD 

Economic Development Director 

Gilbert Office of Economic Development

Redevelopment 

Commission 

COMMUNICATION 

Agenda 

Item 

#3 

TO: 

FROM: 

THROUGH: 







SUBJECT: 

Gilbert Leadership 21 Class Project 


To the discretion of the Redevelopment Commission 

BACKGROUND 

Mr. Alan Fitzgerald, Gilbert Leadership Class Member, will give a presentation and review 

the proposed project for the Heritage District by the Gilbert Leadership Class 21. The 

proposal is for a painted mural on the south side of the American Legion Post 39 building 

and a Gilbert Banner across Gilbert Road near the Western Canal. 


A recommendation is not required. Input from the Commission is appreciated. 



Interim Planning Services Manager 

1

1/9/2013 

1

1/9/2013 

PROJECT SCOPE 

Art mural documenting Gilbert’s present, past, 

and future: paint a piece of art on the 

American Legion Merrill Mitchell Post 39 

building’s south facing wall. Approval has 

been granted by Post 39. 

We also plan to recreate/install original 

“GILBERT” sign replica across Gilbert Road 

in heart of downtown Gilbert. 

Signs will stretch across Gilbert Road, South 

of Elliott and South of Juniper. 

2

1/9/2013 

PROJECT GOALS 

Bring art to the downtown area and connect the art piece to Town’s 

motto of “Gilbert – Clean, Safe, Vibrant,” while preserving the Town’s 

rich history, present achievements and future plans. 

Through this project, the class will be challenged to examine art and its 

importance within the community through a mural. We also plan to 

work with the American Legion and local veterans to create the mural. 

3

1/9/2013 

IMPACT ON THE COMMUNITY 

Beautify downtown Gilbert and bring culture to the public sphere. 

Murals can also have a dramatic impact whether consciously or 

subconsciously on the attitudes of passersby, when they are added to 

areas where people live and work. 

Public murals add an aesthetic improvement to the neighborhood. 

4

1/9/2013 

WHAT POPULATION WILL THIS PROJECT SERVE? 

The mural will be an attractive art piece as well as a way to 

communicate to the public about the features of Gilbert. The following 

are themes being considered for the mural: 

• Veterans & Heroes 

• Trains & Agriculture 

• The Historical Buildings Walk 

• Chandler-Gilbert Community College 

• Phoenix-Mesa Airport 

• Riparian & Observatory 

• Southeast Regional Library 

• Gilbert Historical Museum 

5

1/9/2013 

MATERIALS & COSTS 

Mural = $3650 

• Permits = Not required 

• Gilbert sign work order = Not required 

• Commissioned artist = Estimate $1,500 to $2,000 

• Paint = $525 for 15 gallons at $35 per gallon 

• Brushes/rollers/poles/misc = $150 

• Drop cloths/tarps/tape = $150 

• Ladders = bring our own 

• Smoothing & UV Overcoat = $1,000 

Signs = $12,000 

• Four poles = $6000 + Installation = $1000 

• Two Lighted signs = $3000 

• Electrical = $2000 

Project Scope 

•Mural M l $3650 

•Gilbert Signage $12000 

•Class 21 Sign $500 

•Project Day $636 

•Celebration Day $786 

•Total Project Cost $17,572 

6

1/9/2013 

PERMITS 

No permits are needed as governmental signs are exempt. 

A right-of-way permit from Engineering and a building permit in order 

to install the poles is required. (We’re hoping the poles will be installed 

in Town right-of-way and not on private property). 

Identify a means to run electricity to the poles and sign. An electrical 

y y p g 

permit will be needed at that point as well. 

7

1/9/2013 

• 5-year minimum life 

SUSTAINABILITY 

• American Legion responsible in decision making in sustainability. 

• Possible Community Project 

• Vandalism: Team from Gilbert Leadership Class 21. 

• Alan Fitzgerald, Art Intersection, will lead and coordinate 

necessary repairs due to vandalism. 

• Gilbert Poles & Signs: Please see letter from Gilbert Town Manager 

• Artist: We will interview four to five artists and present two final 

artists to the class for selection. 

8

1/9/2013 

FUNDRAISING STRATEGIES & CAMPAIGN TIMELINE 

• December 21 st : Campaign Planning 

• January 7 th : (Gilbert Leadership Board Meeting): Request for Approval 

• January 8 th : Have Chamber distribute press release announcing project; add details to Chamber 

Web site and via social media 

• January 10 th : Launch e-mail to key constituents, integrate message on Gilbert Leadership Web 

site and via social media channels 

• January 17 th : (Gilbert Leadership Meeting) - Disseminate targets, campaign materials and 

review gift request primer 

• January 16 th : Present project to Gilbert Re-development Commission. 

• January 14 th -18 th : Make personal phone calls and secure individual meetings for gift requests. 

• January 21 

st -March 22 nd : Secure gifts 

• February 21 st : (Gilbert Leadership Meeting) – Acknowledge and steward donors. Project 

Goal: 50% of commitments made 

• February 22 nd : Reminder about gift options to key contacts via email/phone; newsletter story 

via Chamber; post to Gilbert Leadership’s Web page and via group LinkedIn page 

• March 22 nd : (Gilbert Leadership Meeting) – Send email to report on project progress. Project 

Goal: 100% of commitments made. Acknowledge and steward donors. 

9

1/9/2013 

FUNDRAISING STRATEGIES & CAMPAIGN TIMELINE 

• March 25 th : Final reminder about gift options to key contacts via email/phone; update 

Chamber/Gilbert Leadership’s Web pages, social media, etc. 

• April il4 th : Have Chamber send press release off regarding class’ project day; announce 

celebration event date, post details to Chamber/Gilbert Leadership’s news channels 

• April 5 th : Disseminate invitation to Celebration Event 

• April 6 th : Class Project Day 

• April 21 st : Class Project complete 

• April 25 th : RSVPs for dignitaries/key contacts/donors/supporters confirmed for 5/1 event 

• April 29 th : Have Chamber send press release off regarding class’ celebration event; 

announce if key Town officials will be there and who the supporters are/thank donors; talk 

about visuals and other pertinent downtown activities available that evening; post details to 

Chamber/Gilbert Leadership’s news channels 

• May 1 st : Celebration Event 

10

1/9/2013 

CLASS 21 – DIVISION OF LABOR 

• Team Representatives (Co-Spoke-persons): Gayle Disch & Ed Jones 

• Fundraising Leadership Council: All members of Class 21: Centurions 

• Fundraising Campaign Co-Chairs: Gayle Disch, Patrick Banger, & Bob Wilson 

• Fundraising Stewards: Bill Olmstead, Trayce McFarland, Guity Horvat, & Erica Coker 

• Fundraising Campaign Management: Christy Atler, Leanne McEachran, & Bill Olmstead 

• Class Accountant: Tracey Groy 

• Co-Chairs Class Naming: Dave Barwick & Guity Horvat 

• Secretary for Minutes: Lori Gauna; Sergeants At Arms: Sarah Watts & Lori Gauna 

• Co-Chairs Project Design / Budget: Alan Fitzgerald, Lori Gauna, Kyle Mieras, Steve Eiss, 

Stephanie Paschke, & Jay Morris 

• Co-Chairs Community Involvement: Maria Wise, Jean Machnicki, Jen Hewitt 

11

1/9/2013 

CLASS 21 – DIVISION OF LABOR 

• Co-Chairs Project Day: Gavin Hallock, Chris Bisgrove, & Rich Vandermolen 

• Co-Chairs Publicity / Media: Jackie Terry & Tracey Groy 

• Co-Chairs Project Support / Hospitality: Gina Stoner & Sarah Watts 

• Co-Chairs Thank You Notes: Guity Horvat, Trayce McFarland, & Erica Coker 

• Co-Chairs Sustainability: Dave Barwick & Tom Carilini 

12

Gilbert American Legion Post 39 

206 N Gilbet Rd 

Gilbert AZ 85234 

480-892-7038 

Fax 480-892-0451 

www.Azleqion39.org 


Alan Fitzgerald 

Gilbert Leadership Class 2l 

Mr. Fitzgemld 

I want to take a minute and thank you for approaching us regarding your Class project, a 

mural on our south facing wal1. We discussed this projeat at our board meeting and I 

want to assure you we are very interested. 

The concerns expressed were as follows: 

. We want to be sure the Town of Gilbert has no problem with the mural 

o We would need an artist's rendering of the mural before it is painted, to ensure 

consistency with The Amedcan Legions stated mission 

. Arc there any plans fm maintenance issues in the event of long term fading, or 

gaff1ti that might be placed? 

Ifyou are able, we would like to invite you or another member ofthe class to our January 

meeting where all our membe$ could hear more directly about the plans for the mural. 

The meeting is January 8, 2013 at 6PM in the clubroom of our Post. 

The board is solidly behind tlle conaept and we truly appreciate your class thinking ofus 

for this mural. 

Best Regards, 

@*;!'*-- 

Skip Erickson 

Commander Post 39

Redevelopment 

Commission 

COMMUNICATION 

Agenda 

Item 

#4 

TO: 

FROM: 

THROUGH: 







SUBJECT: 

Entertainment District 


A motion may be given to continue the research and public process as outlined in the 

staff report to create an Entertainment District within the Heritage District. 

BACKGROUND 

Gilbert’s Heritage District wants to create a vibrant downtown with bars and other 

entertainment venues that desire liquor. Since State law prohibits businesses with liquor 

licenses from locating within 300 horizontal feet of a church, staff is researching a 

provision that would create an Entertainment District that permits an exemption from this 

requirement. A.R.S.§ 4-207C (4) is a provision whereby the Town Council may create an 

Entertainment District and within that district the Town may, on a case by case basis, 

approve an exemption from the 300-foot requirement. This is not an automatic approval 

as the State also needs to approve the license. The District is designated by resolution 

adopted by the Town Council. 

The District is required to contain a significant number of entertainment uses, artistic and 

cultural venues, including musical halls, concert facilities, theaters, arenas, stadiums, 

museums, studios, galleries, restaurants, bars and other related facilities. Based on 

Gilbert’s population, the Town can have a maximum of two entertainment districts. At this 

time, the Heritage District contains a theater, museum, galleries, studios, restaurants, and 

bars. Other entertainment uses are expected to develop over time. 

The Statute requires that the Entertainment District be a specific contiguous area that 

consists of no more than one square mile, that is no less than one-eighth of a mile in 

width and that it contain a significant number of the uses noted above. Staff is working on 

1

a map that will show the location of schools, churches, entertainment uses, Town owned 

vacant land, and zoning districts that accommodate entertainment uses. 

Summary – Staff is looking for input on any questions or research that should be done as 

part of the effort to create an Entertainment District in the Heritage District. Staff will 

research the success of this type of district in Glendale and Mesa and bring the 

information to the Redevelopment Commission at the next meeting. All landowners within 

the District and 300’ outside the District will be notified of the proposed Entertainment 

District, the Redevelopment Commission would hold a hearing on the proposal for a 

recommendation to the Town Council and the Town Council would review the proposal 

for adoption of an Entertainment District with a Resolution. 


A motion may be given to continue the research and public process as outlined in the 

staff report to create an Entertainment District within the Heritage District. 




2

Redevelopment Commission 

January 16, 2013 

Agenda Item #5 

DRAFT MINUTES 

TOWN OF GILBERT REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION 

REGULAR MEETING OF DECEMBER 19, 2012, 6:30 PM 

COUNCIL CHAMBERS 

GILBERT MUNICIPAL CENTER 

50 E. CIVIC CENTER DRIVE 

GILBERT, ARIZONA 

COMMISSION PRESENT: 

COMMISSION ABSENT: 

STAFF PRESENT: 

OTHERS PRESENT: 

Chairman Barlow, Vice Chairman Torgeson, 

Commissioner Fresquez, Commissioner McNally and 

Commissioner Hamilton 

None 

Interim Planning Manager Linda Edwards, Council Liaison 

Ben Cooper, Economic Development Director Dan 

Henderson, Parks and Recreation Manager Scott 

Anderson and Administrative Assistant Elizabeth Stupski 

Diane Fales, Nancy Roberts, Dan Roberts, Caston 

Roberts, Alan Fitzgerald, Linda Bergeson, Lisa Krapf, 

Russell Krapf, Christina Shelley, John Chiazzo, Christine 

Peelen, Tad Peelen, Tina Cooke, Wade Cooke, Megan 

Ruffentine, Beth Baker, Heidi Serrano, Jared Baker, Bruce 

Bergeson and Jim Desmarchais 

ROLL CALL 

Roll was called and a quorum was declared. 

COMMUNICATION FROM CITIZENS 

Chairman Barlow opened the floor to the public for any comments or communications on 

items not on the agenda. There were no communications from citizens. 

Chairman Barlow modified the agenda to allow an update under agenda item #7 be given by 

Economic Development Director Henderson before the Presentation portion of the agenda. 


7. Update on Projects in the Heritage District 

Economic Development Director Henderson provided an update and made the Commission 

aware of a partnership that is in place with Local First AZ. Local First AZ is a shop local group 

and through tourism funds, Gilbert authorized a “Small Wonders Map” (print version and digital 

version) that will link the Downtown with other attraction amenities. He indicated that the 

group will be in the downtown soliciting ads and buy-in for the maps. The town will participate 

by funding two-thirds with tourism money and one-third from individuals who wish to advertise 

in the Small Wonders Map.

DRAFT 

Redevelopment Commission Regular Meeting 


The other update by Economic Development Director Henderson was about the ASU Masters 

of Real Estate Development (MRED) Program. The Program kicked off with Synthesis 2 in 

November 2012. He mentioned over the course of the year the program does three synthesis 

projects. The students will inventory town land and in March 2013 will give their proposal, 

assumptions and summation of the program and initiatives. Economic Development Director 

Henderson indicated the AUS MRED students will come to the January Redevelopment 

Commission to give a more formal presentation and briefing. 

Economic Development Director Henderson mentioned Synthesis 3 will take the students 

through May 2013 and complete the project for Gilbert. It is still in draft form and the Town 

has provided facts and figures to the students. An invitation was extended to the students to 

tour the community, morning and/or night to get a feel of the land and offered town services if 

there were any questions. So that the community will have access, a link will be provided on 

the Heritage District webpage. 

PRESENTATION 

1. Public Art Sculpture Project 

Arts subcommittee representative, Ms. Diane Fales, gave an informational update on the art 

sculpture options being considered. Some examples were included in the Redevelopment 

Commission packets. Presentation included: 

• Consider fiberglass statues as a canvass for local artists to contribute to public art 

• Neighbors in Chandler coordinated such a project approximately five years ago – 

Ostrich forms. 

• Use various forms to support a theme, enhance certain activities. Example given: 

painted giant eggs were part of an area-wide egg hunt in England. It can generate 

excitement. 

• Interested in use of benches. Businesses could sponsor a bench. 

• Benches and chairs can become a social media – creates photo opps for tourists. 

• Benches could be strategically located in the Heritage District. 

• Use of different season for placement of items. 

In conclusion, Ms. Fales mentioned she will keep the Redevelopment Commission informed as 

more details are available. 

PUBLIC HEARING 

2. Z12-21 An amendment to the Town of Gilbert Land Development Code in the 

Heritage Village Center Zoning District 

Chairman Barlow opened the public hearing for Z12-21 A request to amend the Town of 

Gilbert Land Development Code, Chapter I Zoning Regulations, Division 2: Land Use 

Designations, Article 2.4: Heritage Village Center Zoning District, Section 2.402 Land Use 

Regulations Table - Heritage Village Center District, Limitation L2 - Drive-through prohibited, 

2

DRAFT 



related to the restriction of drive-through facilities. A definition for a service bay will be added. The 

effect of the amendment will be to permit or permit with additional regulations a drive-through use in 

the Heritage Village Center Zoning District. 

Principal Planner Edwards gave a quick review of the previous meeting discussions pertaining to 

a request for a text amendment to change the current zoning regulations of drive-through 

facilities in the Heritage District. 

Overview included: 

• Discussed at the October 17 th , October 29 th and November 14 th Redevelopment 

Commission meetings and Planning Commission Study Sessions November 7 th and 

December 5th. 

• A coffee company wants to renovate an existing building and convert a service bay to a 

drive-through facility and the Heritage Village Center Zoning District restricts drivethroughs. 

• HVC Zoning located along Gilbert Road and the vacant parcels west of Gilbert Road. 

• Heritage District currently has two (2) drive-through facilities (Burger King & Dairy 

Queen) and two (2) Service Bay facilities (Xpress Lube & Clements Garage). Two 

drive-throughs and one service bay on the north side of canal. West of Gilbert Road is 

mostly vacant while the east side is completely developed. Clements Garage is located 

on the east side of Gilbert Road just north of the railroad tracks surrounded by 

undeveloped land. 

• The Vision of Heritage District has been the same since the Redevelopment Plan was 

adopted. The Heritage District will be a destination to visit, shop, work and live. It will 

be a place where new residents can visit and connect with the Town’s origin. The 

Heritage District will, again, be the vital center of the Town. The vision has not changed 

but what has changed are the players, businesses, needs of the community and the 

economy. 

• Tools to guide the Vision include the Redevelopment Plan, General Plan, Heritage 

District Overlay Zoning District, Heritage Village Center Zoning district, two Urban 

Design Team Recommendations (DAT Studies), Heritage District Design Guidelines 

and the ASU Mixed-Use Guideline Study. 

• Key words in the vision statement are quality, variety, historic compatibility, mixed uses, 

active uses, pedestrian ambiance and public use. 

• The purpose in the Land Development Code for the Heritage Village Center zoning 

district is intended to foster small scale, pedestrian oriented mixed-use development 

and encourage a mix of uses-high density residential, retail service, office, lodging, 

entertainment, public and quasi public and cultural uses. It will encourage quality and 

variety in building, landscape, signage design, insure historic compatibility in land use and 

reinforce the historic character of the downtown, support mixed commercial and 

residential areas and attract active uses that will enhance the pedestrian ambiance of the 

downtown. 

3

DRAFT 



• Supporting the vision are established goals such as: 

o Promote quality urban design with emphasis on small town historical character. 

o Insure the economic viability of downtown. Promote reinvestment and attract 

new development. 

o Improve pedestrian and auto circulation to ensure pedestrian safety. 

o Promote downtown as the symbolic/cultural center of the community. 

• The HVC Zoning District currently has a L2 limitation prohibiting drive-through facilities 

for Automated Teller machine, Banks and Other financial institutions, dry cleaning and 

Laundry Outlet, Restaurants, Beverage Service Restaurant, Limited Service. 

• Gilbert has only two other areas with the same L2 limitation—Gateway Village Center 

District (110 acres) and the Gateway Business Center (GBC). No drive-throughs are 

permitted in Chandler’s City Center or Scottsdale’s Downtown Overlay District. 

Principal Planner Edwards also reviewed the different zoning options available for a text 

amendment to the Gilbert Land Development Code. 

• Option 1: Delete Existing L2 limitation – Permits drive-throughs in the HVC Zoning 

District. 

• Option 2: Modify Existing L2 limitation – existing drive-through lane. The L2 limitation 

for the property north of the Western Canal could be revised to state that existing 

drive-throughs facilities and Service Bay/Roll Up door facilities can remain and continue 

to be used as drive-throughs until the drive-through facility is no longer there. An 

existing Service Bay/Roll Up door would be able to convert to a drive-through facility. 

A public comment was given suggesting a Use Permit could also be a requirement when 

a drive-through facility has a new user or Service Bay/Roll up door facility conversion is 

proposed. A suggestion was also made at a previous meeting that a Use Permit could 

also be a requirement as well as limit to restaurant uses. 

• Option 3: Modify Existing L2 limitation – location north of Western Canal on East side 

of Gilbert Road. The L2 Limitation could be revised to state that the limitation does 

not apply to the area north of the Western Canal on the east side of Gilbert Road. 

• Option 4: Use Permit. Delete the L2 limitation and require a Use Permit. 

• Option 5: Unique Findings for a Use Permit – Require findings today for all Use 

Permits. Some unique findings could address standards such as circulation, access, 

stacking, hours of operation. 

• Option 6: Change the zoning district boundary – A different zoning district could be 

proposed for the area north of the Western Canal and east of Gilbert Road. General 

Commercial could be proposed. In order to do this, it would require a Prop 207 waiver 

from all the property owners and go through a zoning boundary change. From a 

planning perspective, may lose a great deal of flexibility. 

Interim Planning Manager Edwards reviewed the limitations and Use Definitions for the text 

amendment. 

• Table 2.4012 Land Use Regulations- Interim Planning Manager Edwards reviewed the 

Use Classification and Existing HVC designation 

4

DRAFT 



Limitations 

o Added L2a – for Automated Teller Machine, Automated Teller Machine, 

Remote, Banks and Other Financial Institutions and Dry Cleaning and Laundry 

Outlet and Retail Sales-General. 

o Added L2b – for Eating and Drinking Establishments, Restaurants, Beverage 

Service and Limited Restaurants 

L2a – Drive-through facilities prohibited 

L2b – Existing drive-through facilities located north of the Western Canal may continue 

to operate as drive-through facilities until the facility no longer exists. An existing 

Service Bay facility located north of the Western Canal may convert to a drivethrough 

facility for the Restaurants, Beverage Service or Restaurants, Limited 

Service uses until the drive-through facility no longer exists. A Use Permit is 

required. 

U 

Use Permit for Eating and Drinking Establishments, Restaurants, Beverage and 

Limited Service (This was later deleted in the motion because it is not the intent 

to require all Eating and Drinking Establishments to require a Use Permit – just 

those affected by this L2 change. Since the Use Permit requirement is part of the 

language for the L2b text amendment, it was deleted from the chart.) 

• Added a use definition for Service Bay Facility – A building containing bay or roll-up 

doors or similar service openings to provide a service within the building. 

Interim Planning Manager Edwards made a correction that the U should be removed and for 

the Redevelopment Commission to strike it from the motion if they desire to move forward. 

In conclusion, Interim Planning Manage Edwards emphasized the following points from the 

Powerpoint Presentation: 

• Affects the HVC zoning district, specifically north of the canal, not all property in the 

Heritage District 

• Affects existing drive-throughs currently with restaurant uses to continue as restaurant 

uses with a drive-through facility and provides an opportunity for an auto use that is no 

longer permitted to convert to a restaurant use with a drive-through facility. 

• A vibrant destination has a mix of uses. Includes a working environment and 

commercial activities. 

• Chandler and Scottsdale centers have grandfathered drive-through uses. 

• Pedestrian ambiance includes outdoor seating and places for people to gather. Active 

uses enhance pedestrian ambiance. 

• Vision – a place to work-gather-dine, no single use dominates the area, is economically 

sustainable. 

• Goals in the Redevelopment Plan and Character area promote reinvestment and ensure 

pedestrian safety. 

• Findings for Use Permit will review access, circulation, stacking, hours of operation, 

noise, light and visual impacts. 

5

DRAFT 



Interim Planning Manager Edwards mentioned the Planning Commission comments received 

during its December 5 th meeting. 

• Concern about the future pedestrian connections from the south of Heritage District 

through up to the north. 

• The north side of canal has a different feel - has a different pedestrian focus – more 

vehicular. 

• No action should be considered and the L2 restriction should continue. 

• The amendment seems too specific. 

• Access from Gilbert Road. 

• Question about a Use-Permit. 

Chairman Barlow opened the agenda item to the public and requested the speakers to limit 

their comments to two minutes. Slips received as follows: 

• 5 in favor and wished to speak 

• 5 in opposition and wished to speak 

• 6 in favor and did not want to speak 

• 3 in opposition and did not want to speak 

Ms. Linda Bergeson, owner of properties in the Heritage District, wanted clarification on how 

the proposed text amendment if passed would affect existing drive-throughs. Interim Planning 

Manager Edwards responded if an existing drive-through (example: Burger King) closes its 

doors, the text amendment would allow the drive-through to stay as long as the new user is a 

restaurant. If the text amendment is not approved and Burger King closes and closed more 

than 12 months, the drive –through goes away. Ms. Bergeson read from a statement: she 

prepared “My husband and I grew up and graduated from schools in the Old Town Scottsdale 

area. We had an opportunity to visit the Old Town Scottsdale area twice in the last three 

weeks. It was amazing to see what most of what we remembered, including my husband’s high 

school, gone and replaced with new development. The good part was that it still had its 5 th 

Avenue that we remember, Sugarbowl and some of the other old style shops that we 

remember. It was very pedestrian friendly and we spent quite a lot of time walking the entire 

area which was very pleasant experience. Most importantly it seems like it has transformed 

itself through vision and planning into a destination that attracts people from around the world 

which she hopes it is the ultimate goal of Gilbert since she is a long time resident.” She does 

not believe that having drive-through in their downtown area attracts anyone and is only a 

convenience. She mentioned a comment made previously by a Commissioner about the way 

the northern section of the Heritage District is probably the best it will be in our lifetime. She 

felt it is a very narrow view and hopes this is not the view of the Commission or leaders of the 

Town of Gilbert in relations to our Heritage District. You only have to look at the neighbors 

in Scottsdale and Chandler to understand that there is a limited to life to some businesses that 

allow others to rise (example: empty lot next to Bergies). The building had been there for 

many years and no one could perceive what happened to it in July. It is now gone and a new 

development will come in; hopefully, a development that wants to abide by the guidelines of the 

Heritage District. She believes that a master plan and vision of which the Commission was 

6

DRAFT 



appointed to be a part of to work to enhance the plan for the good of the entire district. She 

does not believe the position is to change the rules for those that come in and do not want to 

comply with the current codes. In her opinion, a good addition to our neighborhood district is 

someone who does not come and immediately start asking to change the rules but one who 

comes in and adapts their plans to the existing vision of the neighborhood. Approval of this 

drive-through will open the door for future requests for exemptions and weaken the plan and 

vision for the district that has previously been overwhelming approved by its Citizens, 

Commissioners, Planners and Council in the Town of Gilbert. She urged the Redevelopment 

Commission to vote no on the text amendment. 

Mr. Dan Roberts, property owner of the building, read a statement – “All plans including our 

nation’s Constitution need flexibility in amending from time to time as none are going to be 

perfect forever. For this reason the City uses text amendments. For over twenty years nothing 

has happened north of the canal to bring it closer to meeting the desired goals. Each change 

over time and flexibility of regulation are needed to achieve this. The Heritage District’s goal of 

becoming a popular place to work, gather, dine, relax, shop, and live has started to become a 

reality in the core and at the south end of the district. However, it is not due to the zoning 

regulations. If our City stuck to the exact vision as seen in the dream pictures presented as the 

desired ideal, today, we would not have Joe’s Real BBQ, Oreganos or Postinos. Those buildings 

are not built according to the vision of two or more story buildings as well as other 

restrictions. Because they were allowed, we have the exact desire and outcome of vibrancy for 

the area. This text amendment does not interrupt any positive progress in the core or the 

south end of the district. It is limited to the existing buildings with drive-through or service 

bays north of the canal. The north end of the district is nothing like the south end of the core. 

The speed limit is higher, there are existing drive throughs such as Dairy Queen and Burger 

King and there are no defining improvements there. Most people feel like the downtown 

begins south of the canal where the speed limit is reduced to 25 mph. Those who do a visual 

inspection of the location understand the reasonableness of the request. The building has a 

useful life of another 30 years and not likely to be torn down anytime soon nor will the 

buildings surrounding it. Some flexibility is needed as the property could go on forever in its 

grandfathered use of an automotive service business. New automotive uses are not permitted. 

This is a rare opportunity to go from meeting zero percent of the goal to 99% of the goal. 

Successful pedestrian areas not always 100% car free. Pedestrian-friendly areas such as 

Agritopia are planning to incorporate drive throughs in the epic center main street shopping 

area, the SanTan Mall is pedestrian friendly area which incorporates vehicles throughout. 

Despite the tight regulations, Downtown Scottsdale and Chandler have drive throughs within 

their boundaries and all part of a mixed-use area. The goal and vision is a vibrant place to 

work, gather dine relax shop and live it is not to have only two story buildings or eliminate 

every car. For the property to reach its highest use and achieve the desired goal of the District 

of having a more vibrant, pedestrian-friendly, family place to work, live and play, the text 

amendment is essential.” 

Mr. Bruce Bergeson, Gilbert resident – Said Joe’s BBQ has been in the Heritage District for a 

long time and did not receive any special treatment. Mr. Bergeson indicated he is a business 

owner in the downtown and one reason he opened a business is because of the vision and 

7

DRAFT 



pedestrian-friendly feel of the Heritage District. He said drive-throughs and pedestrians have 

anything in common. Ms. Bergeson has not seen any traffic flow plans as to how it will be 

converted. He does not see any common sense in allowing the text amendment. 

Mr. Jim Desmarchais, resident of Gilbert, stated he is in total support of what is being proposed 

with the text amendment. He indicated he has lived in Gilbert for a long time and have 

watched the downtown area start to grow with Joe’s and Liberty Market and other businesses 

but at the north nothing has been happening. If a business is looking for somewhere to locate, 

they are looking for other customers. The oil change place that is struggling and may end up 

closing which will not entice other businesses to come to the downtown Mr. Desmarchais 

also mentioned you cannot anticipate what the future will bring, and that is why there is a 

process in place to review the plan. He said the text amendment is very specific so it will not 

allow any abuse and will not lose the overall vision of the area. 

Mr. Alan Fitzgerald, Gilbert resident and property owner in the Heritage District provided the 

following comment. He said what has been heard tonight goes in opposition with 

conversations he had with certified urban designers about the impact of traffic in drive-throughs 

on being pedestrian friendly. It was stated by the Town that they consider drive throughs to be 

family- friendly. It is in opposition to best practices in urban design. He is opposed to the 

change and wants to stay the course mostly because it does not represents what is safest in 

that area. The original presentation given stated it would generate additional 400 – 500 cars 

per day and nobody has refuted that or changed that. There have been no published safety 

studies, any needed modifications to the street to support the additional traffic, input from the 

residents, businesses and school in the surrounding area concerning of viability that the 

additional traffic and the safety they may have. He thinks the best practice in urban design 

strongly points against making a change like this. 

Ms. Heidi Serrano, a Gilbert resident, read through everything to get a grasp on both sides of 

this situation. She said this is good problem to have which is that a business wants to locate to 

Gilbert and wants to be in the Heritage District. She pointed out that not long ago, Gilbert was 

losing businesses, couldn’t get business here and people were losing their jobs and it is great 

that Gilbert is having this discussion today. She said times change and things change. You need 

to reevaluate and reanalyze what is going on and what changes are being made. This is where 

we are at today and Gilbert has an opportunity of a business wanting to locate in Gilbert. She 

said Dutch Bros is a national company and a business that has proven itself. They are locally 

owned and the profitability goes back into the community. 

Ms. Lisa Krapf, a Gilbert resident, spoke against the proposed text amendment. She was 

somewhat confused on why drive-throughs were lumped together with service bays when they 

are two total separate things. Ms. Krapf said that pedestrian friendly to her is not having 

anything to do with drive-throughs. She stated there are school children that have to walk 

home every day and with cars entering and exiting driveways for the proposed drive-through is 

8

DRAFT 



not a good mix. Also it was mentioned to attract active uses that will enhance the pedestrian 

ambiance. She thinks it is contradictory to drive throughs period. She would love to have 

more businesses come in but why is there a need for a drive-through as opposed to just having 

a restaurant or a coffee house without a drive through. 

Ms. Christina Shelley, a Gilbert resident, spoke on the proposed text amendment and voiced 

her thoughts. She mentioned it is apparent the current car repair business will not survive and 

why take a chance of having the building vacant and invites vandalism and decay. She said that 

the current employees will be kept and retrained. Ms. Shelley said it does invite pedestrian 

traffic and it has a place to sit outside. She said she has a six year old grandson who would go 

over to Dairy Queen while she has a cup of coffee. Gilbert needs to encourage whatever form 

of local business you can. 

Ms. Russell Krapf, a Gilbert resident, spoke on other communities (Providence, RI, Boston, MA, 

and Biloxi, MS) where revitalization went right out the window due to decision that were made. 

Mr. Krapf said the only city that stood fast was New Orleans, LA where they kept out all drivethroughs 

and kept the historical character intact. Pedestrian-friendly and drive-throughs do not 

mix and has a concern with the traffic. People will avoid Gilbert Road. 

Ms. Nancy Roberts, a Gilbert resident and property owner and stakeholder in the District. Ms. 

Roberts indicated that several years ago there was only one, large locally owned restaurant 

called Joe’s Real BBQ in the downtown. Then along came Oregano’s which needed special 

zoning overlays in order to build their business. Accommodations were made allowing them to 

build and the outcome has been a happy ending for the downtown. Similarly, the proposed text 

amendment will allow a wonderful new neighbor also locally owned and operated to the 

district. The current auto business is locally owned and operated franchise which has not 

bothered anyone. The proposed new coffee company has a well-established reputation of 

being a good neighbor to other businesses. This can be seen in their current locations where 

they co-exist harmoniously with multiple competing coffee shops each one thriving in their own 

niche. The contributions to area schools and communities can be seen in numerous articles. 

Gilbert can choose to walk away from this opportunity and move into the direction of the 

vision and remain with an auto use for another thirty year or embrace this opportunity. 

Ms. Roberts ended with a statement from coffee company’s philosophy of operation. It is the 

company’s Optimist Creed: Talk health, happiness and prosperity to every person you meet; 

look at the sunny side of everything and make your optimism come true, think only the best, 

work only for the best and expect only the best, be just as enthusiastic about the success of 

others as you are about your own, give so much time to the improvement of yourself that you 

have no time to criticize others. 

Ms. Roberts indicated this is the type of neighbor Gilbert would want to have and want to be 

ourselves. Perhaps then everyone can fully reach the goal of becoming a popular place to work, 

gather, dine, relax, shop, and live together. 

9

DRAFT 



Ms. Roberts thanked the Redevelopment Commission for the enormous amount of time and 

energy that were put into the request. 

Chairman Barlow closed the public portion of agenda item #2 and brought it back to the 

Redevelopment Commission for discussion 

The Commission had an opportunity to comment on the issue as well as ask question. 

Vice Chairman Torgeson mentioned people have a desire to see a vision which started twentytwo 

years ago. He said it is a different world. Vice Chairman Torgeson pointed out that the 

alley behind Postino’s will mix vehicles and pedestrians on the same piece of asphalt. He said 

that area will have more pedestrian problems there then with a driveway. Vice Chairman 

Torgeson said the town will not ignore any safety issues and it will be stopped at Council if 

something is deemed unsafe and would be addressed. The Redevelopment Commission’s 

responsibility is to discuss so that respect is given to all sides. Vice Chairman Torgeson stated 

he would rather consider this option rather let it turn into a pawn shop or quick loan shop. 

Commissioner McNally remembered when Postino’s was introduced to the Heritage District 

and googled “wine bars”. He was surprised to see Liberty Market at the top of the list. He 

said everyone is happy with the outcome. He also stated that competition is good. 

Commissioner McNally does not want to stop traffic from coming to the area but try to 

increase traffic. He does not think it would create too much additional traffic and there are 

plenty of staff to look at and review the traffic portion of the request. 

Commissioner Hamilton indicted there are valid points on both sides. He believes in the vision 

but now facing the reality of existing building and it existing uses. He thinks it is a narrow way 

to promote reinvestment and up-use. Commissioner Hamilton had a small comment on the 

language of the text amendment. 

Commissioner Fresquez mentioned she will not be supporting the text amendment and gave 

her rationale. She does not believe the text amendment supports the vision of the Heritage 

District. She said the vision statement for the Heritage District is lengthy, finely crafted and 

heavily wordsmithed. Commissioner Fresquez said there is a process to change the vision and 

felt the Redevelopment Commission may want to re-look at the vision and perhaps have a 

vision for the retail core, one for the north and one for the southern section and maybe just 

look at one vision that actually incorporates everything. Visions are long-term. Commissioner 

Fresquez also had a safety concern southbound from Juniper and may be dangerous to turn left. 

She said it may not even be legal to turn left as it is stripped for left turn going north. This has 

not been addressed and whatever changes needed the expenses not be for the town but for 

the business. She heard a comment from the owner that when they purchased the property 

that they were not aware they were in the Heritage District because there is no signage. 

Commissioner Fresquez mentioned that there is no master plan or economic plan in place and 

had inquired Gilbert is moving in that direction. 

10

DRAFT 



Chairman Barlow reiterated he had been on the Redevelopment Commission for 9 years and 

believes in the vision but things have changed. Segments along Gilbert Road will need to be 

revisited and that a Master Plan & signage is needed. He pointed out one of the reasons he 

located his business to the Heritage District on Gilbert Road was the traffic counts. He wanted 

the exposure. He has not noticed any traffic congestion. Chairman Barlow said he was sorry 

that some members of the community are feeling we have slighted them in some manner but 

has been objective in keeping an open-mind. 

Commissioner Hamilton to add drive-through to L2b so that it will read: Existing drive-through 

facilities located north of the Western Canal may continue to operate as drive-through facilities 

until the drive-through facility no longer exists. An existing Service Bay facility located north 

of the Western Canal may convert to a drive-through facility for the Restaurants, Beverage 

Service or Restaurants, Limited Service uses until the drive-through facility no longer exists. A 

Use Permit is required. 

A MOTION was made by Commissioner McNally, seconded by Vice Chairman Torgeson as 

follows: For the following reasons: the text amendment proposal conforms to the intent of the 

General Plan and the purpose statements of the Heritage Village Center Zoning District for 

existing and future development, the Redevelopment Commission moves to recommend to the 

Planning Commission that they recommend approval to the Town Council of Z12-21, a Land 

Development Code text amendment to modify the L2 limitation in Table 2.402 Land Use 

Regulations – Heritage Village Center Zoning District, and a Use Definition for Service Bay 

Facility as described below: 

Strikethrough means deleted and bold means new. “A” designates uses that require an 

Administrative Use Permit pursuant to Article 5.4: Use Permits. “U” designates uses that 

require a Conditional Use Permit pursuant to Article 5.4: Use Permits. 

Table 2.402 Land Use Regulations-Heritage Village Center District 

Use Classification Existing HVC Proposed HVC 

Automated Teller Machine L1, L2 L1, L2 L2a 

Automated Teller Machine, Remote A, L2 A, L2 L2a 

Banks and Other Financial Institutions L2 L2 L2a 

Dry Cleaning and Laundry Outlet L2 L2 L2a 

Eating and Drinking Establishments 

Restaurants, Beverage Service 

Restaurants, Limited Service 

L2 

L2 

L2 L2b 

L2 L2b 

Retail Sales, General L2 L2 L2a 

11

DRAFT 



Limitations 

L1 – Only as a use incidental to the principal use of the property. 

L2 L2a - Drive-through facilities prohibited. 

L2 L2b – Existing drive-through facilities located north of the Western Canal may 

continue to operate as drive-through facilities until the drive-through facility no 

longer exists. An existing Service Bay facility located north of the Western Canal 

may convert to a drive-through facility for the Restaurants, Beverage Service or 

Restaurants, Limited Service uses until the drive-through facility no longer exists. A 

Use Permit is required. 

Glossary Term 

Service Bay Facility. A building containing bay or roll-up doors or similar 

service openings to provide a service within the building. 

Voice vote carried 4-1. Dissenting vote casted by Commissioner Fresquez 

Chairman Barlow closed the public hearing item #2. 


3. Minutes – Consider Approval of Minutes of the regular meeting of November 

14, 2012 

A correction was made on page 4 in the last paragraph to the number of slips in favor- should 

be 15 not 7. 

A MOTION was made by Vice Chairman Torgeson, seconded by Commissioner McNally, to 

approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the Redevelopment Commission of November 

14, 2012 as amended. Voice vote carried 5-0. 

4. Review Holiday Decoration/Events in the Heritage District 

Parks and Recreation Manager Anderson gave an update on holiday decorations but wanted to 

expand it to facilitate a discussion about future special events in the Heritage District. Parks 

and Recreation Manager Anderson heard tonight a lot of thought about vibrancy in a 

downtown and if you look around at other communities it happens through special events and 

how it can create a festive atmosphere. He indicated a possibility of taking one of the current 

Town events and putting it in the downtown such as the Fall Festival as well as possibly looking 

at special times of the year in which Gilbert Road would have to be closed. Parks and 

Recreation Manager Anderson asked for some feedback from the Redevelopment Commission 

so that discussions could begin after the first of the year. 

Commissioner Fresquez thinks it is a great idea. She asked if there was already an Events 

Committee. Parks and Recreations Manager Anderson responded no just staff. Commissioner 

Fresquez said if specifically talking about the Heritage District and if a subcommittee is to be 

12

DRAFT 



formed, it would be a good idea to have members of the Redevelopment Commission as well 

as merchants involved. She added that she does not want to have a dark Heritage District 

during the holidays and is in favor of it and would like to help. 

Parks and Recreation Manager Anderson mentioned an idea that has been brainstormed was to 

have the Luminary Experience along the western canal in the downtown. Vice Chairman 

Torgeson mentioned the need to have areas where power is available. 

Chairman Barlow asked what the next step would be. Parks and Recreation Manager Anderson 

responded that he will return to the Redevelopment Commission after the first of the year to 

discuss further. It was suggested to put it on the January 23 rd Morning with the Merchants and 

Residents agenda as well. 

5. Discuss use of Town Council Chambers as a regular meeting place for 

Redevelopment Commission hearings 

Chairman Barlow asked for any comments about using the Town Council Chambers as a 

regular meeting place. 

• Vice Chairman Torgeson thinks it is a great idea. Stuff can be easily seen and lends to a 

more professional atmosphere when people talk about investing in the downtown. The 

technology offered by the room is great. 

• Commissioner Hamilton liked the comfortable chairs. 

• Commissioner McNally likes the room but felt uncomfortable being lofted above the 

audience. 

• Commissioner Fresquez said she likes having the Redevelopment Commission meetings 

in the Heritage District. She thinks it would impact those who would attend if the 

venue is moved. Her preference would be to return to the Heritage District. 

• Chairman Barlow likes the location in the Heritage District but prefers being on the 

same level with the audience. He did like the technology offered with the Council 

Chambers. His preference would be to return to the Heritage District. 

Commissioner McNally asked if there would be any conflicts with use of Council Chambers. 

Interim Planning Manager Edwards responded that Conference Room 300 would be a viable 

alternative if Council Chambers was not available. 

6. Committee Update 

a. Downtown Gilbert Partnership Report 

Commissioner Fresquez reported the Downtown Gilbert Partnership has not met but has 

intentions to re-invigorate the group after the holidays. She said after the last couple of 

months, if stakeholders or anyone who has an interest in the Heritage District is invited to join. 

She said it is an important group and intends to put more effort into it. 

b. HRCAP Board and Art Subcommittee Report 

Chairman Barlow said it was a great presentation by Ms. Fales and did not have anything further 

to report. 

13

DRAFT 



c. Event Committee 

Commissioner McNally indicated he will attend the 9 a.m. meeting on December 20 th . He did 

not have any information as to the success of the carnival. He mentioned the Giving Challenge 

did not draw as many people as anticipated and does not know the future status of it. 

d. Gilbert Historical Society 

Commissioner Fresquez mentioned agenda item pertains to the Steering Committee looking at 

the idea for a cultural center. Commissioner Fresquez is a member of two committees: 

• Development Committee which consist of 6 members (four Board members and two 

consultants) 

• Large Steering Committee which consists of 15 - 18 members and two consultants. The 

group brainstormed ideas for cultural centers and will have some additional meetings 

prior to issuing an RFP for a Feasibility Study. 

To help with the communications, a drop box was established where you can find research 

from other communities, creation of an e-newsletter. The Steering Committee is using as a 

guideline the report from the City of Chandler. 

Commissioner Fresquez will provide another update next month. 

7. Update on Project in the Heritage District 

Principal Planner Edwards mentioned the following updates: 

• The Farmers Market, Food Truck Event and Artwalk are still occurring on the weekends 

and sharing customers. 

• Temporary parking lots are being well utilized. 

• New Businesses--Flashback Antiques now opened in the previous Gallery 225 location. 

Encouraged the Commission to visit the location. 

• The Mexican Food Restaurant next to Postinos East has pulled its permits for Tenant 

Improvements. Anticipates being open by April 2013. 

• The new Fish Taco currently working on their construction drawings for their tenant 

improvements by the barber. 

• The dentist at 26 N. Gilbert Road has submitted construction drawings and ready to 

pull permits. 

• The sale of the Beavin property is in escrow. Commissioner Fresquez asked who has 

purchased the property. Interim Planning Manager Edwards said the property is being 

purchased by the owners of Postinos and Oakmark Development, Craig Demarco and 

Mike Bennan. 

• Mr. Mike Bennan with Oakmark Development would like to meet with the 

Commissioners to begin discussions about the new building on the north side. 

COMMUNICATIONS 

8. Report from the Chair 

No report. 

14

DRAFT 



9. Report from Council Liaison on current and future events 

Council Liaison Cooper reported the following: 

• On the December 20 Town Council agenda will be an amendment of the development 

agreement for the Heritage Marketplace and garage-related issues. He encouraged the 

Redevelopment Commission to look at the staff report which is available on-line and if 

there were any comments to contact staff. 

• Wished everyone a Happy Holidays and a wonderful 2013. 

10. Report from Commissioners 

Commissioner Fresquez wished everyone a happy and safe holiday. 

11. Report from Principal Planner 

Principal Planner Edwards said she truly appreciates the input by the Commission, their 

willingness to share ideas and generate work that needs to get done in the Heritage District. 

Chairman Barlow thanked Interim Planning Manager Edwards for all her hard work as well as 

Administrative Assistant Stupski. 

ADJOURNMENT 

Chairman Barlow adjourned the meeting at 8:22 p.m. 

ATTEST: 

__________________________ 

Elizabeth A. Stupski, Recorder 

________________________________ 

Marc Barlow, Chairman 

15

Redevelopment 

Commission 

COMMUNICATION 

Agenda 

Item 

#6 

TO: 

FROM: 

THROUGH: 







SUBJECT: 

Committee Updates 


A motion is not required as Commission members are providing updates only. 

BACKGROUND/ DISCUSSION 

During the year, Redevelopment Commissioners are asked to serve as members of other 

committees, task force groups or stakeholders groups and represent the Redevelopment 

Commission. 

The following committee updates will be provided tonight: 

1. HRCAP Board and Arts Subcommittee – Vice Chairman Barlow 

2. Event Committee – Commissioner McNally 

3. Gilbert Historical Society – Chairman Fresquez 


A motion is not required as Commission members are providing updates only. 


Linda M. Edwards, AICP, 


1

Redevelopment 

Commission 

COMMUNICATION 

Agenda 

Item 

#7 

TO: 

FROM: 

THROUGH: 







SUBJECT: 

Update on Projects in the Heritage District 


This item is being presented for discussion only. 

BACKGROUND/ DISCUSSION 

Media 

Commissioner Tom McNally is scheduled to write the next article followed by Vice 

Chairman Torgeson. 

Special Events 

Merchants 

Town of Gilbert Facebook home web page has links to businesses in the Heritage 

District. View the latest video created by the Gilbert Art Walk that speaks to the 

downtown. 

Christmas banners were created locally and hung for the first time this season. 

Engineering staff continues to work on the street improvement/flashing beacon safety 

project that was funded with CDBG funds. 

The renewal of the Heritage Marketplace Development Agreement was approved by 

Town Council on 12/20/12. Development should start by December 2013 and at least two 

1

estaurants will be substantially complete by September 2014. The parking spaces in the 

future parking garage are no longer committed solely for this development. 

Oakmark Development continues to meet with staff and the Commission members on the 

draft proposal to build on the north side of Postino East in the next few months. 

A dentist continues to pursue 26 N. Gilbert Road for his place of business. 

A Fish Taco Restaurant is proposed next to the Barber on Gilbert Road. The space is 

currently vacant and the new design will include outdoor seating on the east side of the 

space facing the parking area. Construction continues and the opening is scheduled for 

January/February. 

The Farmer’s Market is now open 8am to Noon at the Park and Ride lot on Ash Street by 

the Water Tower Plaza. 

The Food Truck event will be held on Fridays from 4-11pm and on Saturdays from 9am – 

3pm. The event will run through June 2013. 

The Gilbert Art Walk will be held in the Water Tower Plaza on the first and third Saturdays 

of the month – Jan 5 and 19, Feb 2 and 16, March 2 and 16. 

The Morning with Heritage District Merchants and Residents meeting is scheduled for 

January 23, 2013 at 7:30 a.m. at the Boys & Girls Club on Oak Street in Gilbert. 

Postcards mailed to residents 1/3/13, e-mails sent on 12/26/12 to merchants with e-mail 

and a flyer mailed to merchants without an e-mail. 


A motion is not requested for this agenda item. 




2

gilbert redevelopment commission agenda ... - Town of Gilbert

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?