corio norlane structure plan background report - City of Greater ...
corio norlane structure plan background report - City of Greater ... corio norlane structure plan background report - City of Greater ...
The increase in lone person households and decrease of households with 4 or more people has contributed to the overall fall in household size across Corio in Norlane. The proportion of single person households almost doubled from 1991 (15.5%) to 2006 (29%), whilst the proportion of households with 4 or more people fell from 35% in 1991 to 20% in 2006. The number of households with 2 and 3 people remained relatively stable over this time period. Figure 6 – Household Composition, Corio and Norlane 1991 – 2006 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 1991 1996 2001 2006 5 or more persons 4 person 3 person 2 person 1 person Source: Suburbs in Time, DPCD, 2006 Dwelling occupancy has remained relatively stable across Corio and Norlane from 1991 to 2006. Suburbs in Time shows that in 2006, occupied private dwellings accounted for 94% of housing stock in Corio and 92% of housing stock in Norlane. The occupancy of private dwellings across the Greater Geelong area was also 92% in 2006. Data for household tenure in 2006 shows the greatest proportion of households in Corio either fully own (30%) or are purchasing homes (32%). 10% of Corio households rented government housing stock and 22% rented other housing stock. In Norlane, whilst fully owned homes was the predominant housing tenure, a lesser proportion of households were purchasing dwellings (20%) and a greater proportion of household were renting government housing stock (22%). Overall, the proportion of government rented housing stock was greater across Corio and Norlane than in comparison to Greater Geelong where this accounts for only 5% of housing tenure. Figure 7 – Household Tenure Household Tenure 2006 40% 35% Households (%) 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% Corio Norlane Geelong 0% Fully owned Being purchased Rented - government Rented - other Other and not stated Source: Suburbs in Time, DPCD, 2006 Corio Norlane Structure Plan Background Report - 40 - Final - March 2011
3.6 Labour Force Suburbs in Time defines “labour force” as persons aged 15 years and over who are employed, or unemployed and actively looking for work. Theoretically, persons not in the labour force include older people that have retired from the workforce. Corio and Norlane have had a higher unemployment rate in comparison to Greater Geelong, with Norlane having a higher unemployment rate in comparison to Corio. 2006 figures show Corio’s unemployment rate at 11.9% and Norlane’s unemployment rate at 17.3%. This is significantly higher than Greater Geelong’s unemployment rate in 2006 at 7.1%. Figure 8 - Unemployment Rate Unemployment Rate 1986 - 2006 30 Unemployment Rate (%) 25 20 15 10 5 0 Corio Norlane Geelong 1986 1996 2001 2006 Source: Suburbs in Time, DPCD, 2006 Across Corio and Norlane, participants in the workforce in 2006 were predominantly employed in the manufacturing sector, although the proportion of participants in this sector fall from 37% to 23% from 1986 to 2006. In 2006, after manufacturing, the next highest workforce participation areas were retail trade (13%) followed by health care and social assistance (8%). Participation in these areas both increased from 1986. The decline in manufacturing employment follows a similar trend to that experienced across the Greater Geelong area where participation in this sector fell from 26% in 1986 to 15% in 2006. However unlike Corio and Norlane, in 1986 Greater Geelong had broader participation in a number of workforce areas including retail trade (14%), heath and social assistance (12%), education and training (9%) and accommodation and food services (7%). Corio Norlane Structure Plan Background Report - 41 - Final - March 2011
- Page 1 and 2: CORIO NORLANE STRUCTURE PLAN BACKGR
- Page 3 and 4: 6.5 Active Transport ..............
- Page 5 and 6: Table 14 - City of Greater Geelong
- Page 7 and 8: PART C 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Backgro
- Page 9 and 10: The City of Greater Geelong has mad
- Page 11 and 12: Map 1- Locality Plan Corio Norlane
- Page 13 and 14: Map 3 - Study Area Corio Norlane St
- Page 15 and 16: partnership with David Stead, but i
- Page 17 and 18: 2.0 Policy and Strategy Context The
- Page 19 and 20: egion, and particularly in identifi
- Page 21 and 22: 2.3.4 Freight Futures - the Victori
- Page 23 and 24: • North Geelong Precinct: to enco
- Page 25 and 26: childhood services. It articulates
- Page 27 and 28: 2.8 Planning Scheme Policy, Zones a
- Page 29 and 30: 2.8.1 Zones The area is subject to
- Page 31 and 32: 2.8.2 Overlays The area is subject
- Page 33 and 34: Map 5 - Design and Development Over
- Page 35 and 36: 2.9 Planning Provisions requiring r
- Page 37 and 38: 3.0 Demographic and Social Profile
- Page 39: accounting for 18% of the total pop
- Page 43 and 44: Figure 11 - Household Income Corio
- Page 45 and 46: 3.10 Key Influences - Demographics
- Page 47 and 48: Engineering Services Unit generally
- Page 49 and 50: Park and Recreation Zone - PPRZ) pa
- Page 51 and 52: 4.5 Key Influences - Physical Infra
- Page 53 and 54: Map 8 - Residential Character and I
- Page 55 and 56: Norlane Precinct 1 The streetscapes
- Page 57 and 58: 5.2 Increased Housing Diversity Are
- Page 59 and 60: Corio Distillery) at 23A-35 Lowe St
- Page 61 and 62: Map 9 - Vacant Residential Land Cor
- Page 63 and 64: een earmarked to house the Corio Co
- Page 65 and 66: Table 8 - Summary of Residential De
- Page 67 and 68: 6.0 Movement and Transport 6.1 Demo
- Page 69 and 70: Photo 4 - Interstate Platform, Nort
- Page 71 and 72: The study indicated that large port
- Page 73 and 74: 6.4 Road and Freight The transport
- Page 75 and 76: Figure 16 - Geelong Port Linkages S
- Page 77 and 78: 6.5 Active Transport Active transpo
- Page 79 and 80: Figure 18 - North Geelong Cycling R
- Page 81 and 82: Directions and actions from the Gee
- Page 83 and 84: 7.0 Economic Development The sub re
- Page 85 and 86: Data on the number and value of bui
- Page 87 and 88: centres are shown in Map 11 and des
- Page 89 and 90: Table 13 - Summary of Retail Centre
The increase in lone person households and decrease <strong>of</strong> households with 4 or more<br />
people has contributed to the overall fall in household size across Corio in Norlane. The<br />
proportion <strong>of</strong> single person households almost doubled from 1991 (15.5%) to 2006<br />
(29%), whilst the proportion <strong>of</strong> households with 4 or more people fell from 35% in 1991<br />
to 20% in 2006. The number <strong>of</strong> households with 2 and 3 people remained relatively<br />
stable over this time period.<br />
Figure 6 – Household Composition, Corio and Norlane 1991 – 2006<br />
100%<br />
90%<br />
80%<br />
70%<br />
60%<br />
50%<br />
40%<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
0%<br />
1991 1996 2001 2006<br />
5 or more persons<br />
4 person<br />
3 person<br />
2 person<br />
1 person<br />
Source: Suburbs in Time, DPCD, 2006<br />
Dwelling occupancy has remained relatively stable across Corio and Norlane from 1991<br />
to 2006. Suburbs in Time shows that in 2006, occupied private dwellings accounted for<br />
94% <strong>of</strong> housing stock in Corio and 92% <strong>of</strong> housing stock in Norlane. The occupancy <strong>of</strong><br />
private dwellings across the <strong>Greater</strong> Geelong area was also 92% in 2006.<br />
Data for household tenure in 2006 shows the greatest proportion <strong>of</strong> households in Corio<br />
either fully own (30%) or are purchasing homes (32%). 10% <strong>of</strong> Corio households rented<br />
government housing stock and 22% rented other housing stock.<br />
In Norlane, whilst fully owned homes was the predominant housing tenure, a lesser<br />
proportion <strong>of</strong> households were purchasing dwellings (20%) and a greater proportion <strong>of</strong><br />
household were renting government housing stock (22%).<br />
Overall, the proportion <strong>of</strong> government rented housing stock was greater across Corio<br />
and Norlane than in comparison to <strong>Greater</strong> Geelong where this accounts for only 5% <strong>of</strong><br />
housing tenure.<br />
Figure 7 – Household Tenure<br />
Household Tenure 2006<br />
40%<br />
35%<br />
Households (%)<br />
30%<br />
25%<br />
20%<br />
15%<br />
10%<br />
5%<br />
Corio<br />
Norlane<br />
Geelong<br />
0%<br />
Fully owned Being purchased Rented -<br />
government<br />
Rented - other<br />
Other and not<br />
stated<br />
Source: Suburbs in Time, DPCD, 2006<br />
Corio Norlane Structure Plan<br />
Background Report - 40 - Final - March 2011