Preventive Resettlement of Populations at Risk of Disaster - GFDRR
Preventive Resettlement of Populations at Risk of Disaster - GFDRR
Preventive Resettlement of Populations at Risk of Disaster - GFDRR
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
canalizing streams, and carrying out urbaniz<strong>at</strong>ion activities<br />
alongside them. The program ended in 2008, following<br />
an investment <strong>of</strong> approxim<strong>at</strong>ely US$1.35 billion.<br />
Interventions in geological risk areas<br />
The Technical Advice Office for Works and Services <strong>of</strong><br />
the Municipal Secretari<strong>at</strong> for Coordin<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the subdivisions<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Mayor’s Office (subalcaldías) seeks to<br />
control mudslides on slopes and the banks <strong>of</strong> streams.<br />
From 2005-2008, the program carried out 202 works in<br />
562 loc<strong>at</strong>ions considered to be <strong>at</strong> geological risk in 20<br />
subalcaldías.<br />
Stream canaliz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
The unauthorized occup<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> land on the banks <strong>of</strong><br />
streams in São Paulo put the low-income popul<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
th<strong>at</strong> settled there <strong>at</strong> risk. These settlements also cause<br />
w<strong>at</strong>er pollution and sediment<strong>at</strong>ion in the streams because<br />
they dispose <strong>of</strong> solid waste directly into them,<br />
which in turn, increases flooding risks.<br />
One program designed to mitig<strong>at</strong>e and reverse these<br />
conditions was PROCAV, which began <strong>at</strong> the end <strong>of</strong><br />
the 1980s. It included a series <strong>of</strong> multi-faceted works<br />
in the c<strong>at</strong>chment basins <strong>of</strong> the metropolitan region and<br />
was carried out in two stages, from 1987-1994 and from<br />
1995-2007. It was initially estim<strong>at</strong>ed th<strong>at</strong> the program<br />
would take from four to five years to complete, but, due<br />
to its complexity, it lasted 10. The US$1.05 billion investment<br />
was used to canalize 63.3 km in 21 streams,<br />
construct 60.4 km <strong>of</strong> roads alongside the canals, and<br />
build eight dams.<br />
The program involved resettling 7,544 families—2,585<br />
from 1987-1994, and 5,137 from 1995-2007—who were<br />
occupying the areas where the works were carried out<br />
and where there were recurrent floods.<br />
The resettlement solutions for those families included:<br />
■■<br />
<strong>Resettlement</strong> in three housing complexes<br />
(benefiting 5,288 families—1,590 in the first stage<br />
and 3,876 in the second);<br />
■■<br />
■■<br />
<strong>Resettlement</strong> in safe areas <strong>of</strong> the same neighborhoods<br />
(634 families)<br />
Cash compens<strong>at</strong>ion for properties whose owners<br />
had obtained <strong>of</strong>ficial permits and deeds, involving<br />
1,622 families, 995 in the first stage and 627 in the<br />
second (see Table 4.5).<br />
Table 4.5. Number <strong>of</strong> Families Resettled during the Stream Canaliz<strong>at</strong>ion Program<br />
First Stage<br />
1987-1994<br />
Second Stage<br />
1995-2007 Total Percentage<br />
<strong>Resettlement</strong> to housing complexes 1,590 3,876 5,288 70<br />
Financial compens<strong>at</strong>ion, expropri<strong>at</strong>ion 995 627 1622 22<br />
<strong>Resettlement</strong> in remaining areas <strong>of</strong> same<br />
neighborhood 634 634 8<br />
Total 2,585 5,137 7,544 100<br />
Source: Archives SEHAB – GePROCAV – IDB<br />
C. Case Study: Stream<br />
Canaliz<strong>at</strong>ion Program II<br />
The case study focuses on the second stage <strong>of</strong> the Stream<br />
Canaliz<strong>at</strong>ion Program PROCAV, from 1995-2007.<br />
1. Objectives<br />
The objectives <strong>of</strong> the second stage <strong>of</strong> the Stream Canaliz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
Program included:<br />
■■<br />
■■<br />
■■<br />
Reducing the problems triggering frequent floods<br />
along the streams by canalizing them and thus<br />
increasing their hydraulic capacity;<br />
Reducing the risk <strong>of</strong> mudslides caused by<br />
destabilized construction and streets loc<strong>at</strong>ed next<br />
to the streams;<br />
Improving sanitary and housing conditions for<br />
the target families by moving those <strong>at</strong> risk to<br />
higher quality houses;<br />
48 <strong>Preventive</strong> <strong>Resettlement</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Popul<strong>at</strong>ions</strong> <strong>at</strong> <strong>Risk</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Disaster</strong>: Experiences from L<strong>at</strong>in America